• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/118

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

118 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
case-control study
compares group of people with a disease to a group without

looks at PRIOR risk factors and exposures

observational and retrospective

use odd's ratio to measure
cohort study
compares a group with a given exposure or a risk factor to a group without

observational and PROspective

see what happens

measure with relative risk
cross-sectional study
collects data from group of people to see frequency of disease and related risk factors at ONE POINT IN TIME

what is happening now

measures disease prevalence
twin concordance study
comparise frequency with which both monozygotic twins or both dizygotic dtwins develop disease

measures heitability
adoption study
compare siblings raised by biologic vs adopted parents

measure heritablility and influence of environmental factors
clinical trial - what is it in general

best conditions?
EXPERIMENTAL study involving HUMANS

compares 2 or more treatments or treatment and placebo

best if:
randomized
controlled
double blinded
phase 1 clinical trials
small number of HEALTHY volunteers

look at:
safety
toxicity
pharmacokinietics
phase 2 clinical trials
small number patients with DISEASE

look at:
efficacy
optimal dosing
adverse effects
phase 3 clinical trials
LARGE number of patients - random assignment to experimental treatment or to best available treatment/placebo

compare new treatment to old or no treatment
phase 4 clinical trials
after approval of drug

surveillance - detects long term adverse effects
meta analysis
pools data from several studies to generate overall conclusion

increased statistical power
integrates studies

most powerful clinical evidence

limited by quality of the individual studies or bias in study selection
sensitivity
SNOUT - SeNsitivity rules OUT

TP/(TP+FN)

high sensitivity = low false negative rate

good for screen disease with low prevalence
specificity
SPIN - SPecificity rules IN

TN/(TN+FP)

high specificity = low false positive rate

use as confirmatory test after positive screen
why is a western blot given after ELISA for HIV testing?
ELISA has high sensitivity, low specificity

Western has high specificity, lo sensitvity
positive predictive value
proportion of positive test that are true positive

probability that person has disease given positive test

TP/(TP+FP)

if prevalence of disease is low, the PPV will be low regardless of high specificity or sensitivity
T/F the higher the prevalence of a disease the higher the PPV and the lower the NPV
True
negative predictive value
proportion of net tests that are actually negative for disease

probability that person actually is disease free given a negative test result

TN/(TN+FN)
prevalence vs incidence
prevalence is number of cases at a specific point in time

incidence is new cases in a given time period
T/F prevalence can be approximated by incidence x disease duration
true
T/F prevalence < incidence for chronic disease
false

prevalence is > incidence for chronic disease
T/F prevalence = incidence for acute disease
true
T/F people currently with disease or those previously positive for disease are not considered at risk when calculating incidence
true
incidence
new cases in population over a givien time period/total population AT RISK during time period
how do people leave the population of prevalent cases?
dying or recovering from illness
Odd's ratio Equation
ad/bc
relative risk equation
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]

probability of getting disease in exposed compared to unexposed
attributable risk
a/(a+b) - c/(c+d)

difference in the risk between exposed and unexposed

"smoking causes 1/3 of cases of pneumonia"
when does odd's ratio approximate relative risk
when prevalence is not too high
absolute risk reduction
reduction in risk assoicated with treatment compared to placebo

absoluate risk = incidence

so if incidence before treatment is 2% and the incidence after treatment is 1.5% then absoluate risk reduction is 2-1.5 = 0.5% risk reduction
number needed to treat
1/absoluate risk reduction
number needed to harm
1/attributable risk

number of people needed to be exposed to risk factor for one person to be harmed
precision
consistency and reproducibility of test (reliability)

absence of random variation

precision is reduced by random error
accuracy
trueness of test measurement (of what the test is measuring)

accuracy is reduced by systematic error (bias)
selection bias
nonrandom assignment to study group
recall bias
knowledge of presence of disorder alters recall by subjects
sampling bias
subjects are not representative relative to gen population

results are not generalizable
late-look bias
information gathered at an inappropriate time

studying a fatal disease with a survey (only those living will answer)
procedure bias
subjects in different groups are not treated the same
confounding bias
occurs with 2 closely associated factors

1 factor distorts or confuses the effect of other
lead-time bias
early detection confused with increased survival

see with improved screen, the early detection gives false sensation as if survival increased
pygmalion effect
when researcher's belief in efficacy of treatment changes outcome
hawthrone effect
occurs when the group being studied changes behavior due to the knowledge of being studied
ways to reduce bias (4)
blind studies (double blind better)

placebo responses

crossover studies (each subject acts as its own control)

randomization
positive skew effect on mean,median, mode
mean > median > mode

tail is on the right
negative skew effect on mean, median, mode
mean < median < mode

tail is on the left
null hypothesis
hypothesis of no difference - no association between disease and risk factor and population
alternative hypothesis
hypothesis that there is some difference - there is an association between disease and risk factor
type 1 error (alpha)
stating there IS an effect or difference when NONE EXISTS - "false positive error" - like convicting an innocent man

mistakenly accepted the alt hypothesis and rejected the null hypothesis

just against alpha with p

if p<0.05 then there is less than 5% chance that the data will show something is not there
type 2 error (beta)
stating there is NOT an effect when one DOES EXIST - "false negative error" - setting a guilty man free
power
1-beta

ability to detect a difference if there really is one

depends on:

1. number of end points experienced by population

2. difference in compliance between treatment groups

3. size of expected effect

power in numbers - increase sample size to increase power
standard error of mean
sigma/root(n)

n=sample size
sigma = standard dev

SEM < sigma

SEM decreases as n increases
sigma
standard dev

+/- 1sigma = 68%

+/- 2sigma = 95%

+/- 3sigma = 99.7%
confidence interval
(mean - Z(SEM), mean + Z(SEM))

Z=1.96 for 95% CI

if 95% CI includes 0 for difference between two variables, not significant don't reject null

if 95% CI includes 1 for risk factor or odds, not significant and don't reject null

if 95% CI for 2 groups overlap, then not significantly different
t-test vs ANOVA vs chi-squared
t-test checks difference of MEANS of 2 groups

ANOVA checks difference of means of 3 or more groups

chi-square test - checks differences between 2 or more PERCENTAGES or PROPORTIONS of categorical outcomes
corrolation coefficienct (r)
closer to 1 - the stronger the corrolation

coefficient of determination = r^2
types of prevention
primary - prevent disease occurance

2ndary - early detection

tertiary - reduce disability from disease
reportable disease
Hep, Hep, Hep, Horray the SSSMMART Chick is Gone

HepA
HepB
HepC
HIV
Salmonella
Shigella
Syphilis
Measels
Mumps
AIDS
Rubella
TB
Chickenpox
Gonorrhea
leading cause of death in the US by age

infants?
1-14?
15-24?
25-64?
65+?
infants: congenital anomolies, SIDS, RDS

1-14: injuries, cancer, congenital, homocide, heart disease

15-24: injuries, homicide, suicide

25-64: cancer, heart disease, injuries

65+: heart disease, cancer, stroke
MedicarE
all patients > 65

patients < 65 with certain disabilities and ESRD

part A - impatient care, skilled nursing, hospice, home health

part B - outpatient care, doctors services, PT/OT

part C - combo of A+B

part D - standalone precription drugs
medicaiD
for destitute, low income
core ethical principles (4)
autonomy - patient is an individual and docs must honor their preferences

beneficence - doctor acts in patent best interest, but patient decides as long as he can make the decision

nonmaleficence - do no harm, if intervention benefit outweighs risk, patient makes decision

justice - treat persons fair
informed consent
requires:
1. discussion of pertinent information
2. patient agreement to plan of care
3. freedom from coercion

patient understands risk, benefits, alternatives

exceptions:
patient can't make decision, emergency is implied consent, if information would be damaging, or waived
consent for minors
a minor is <18

need parental consent unless emancipated (married, self support, children, military)

EXCEPT: contraceptives, STD treatment, pregnancy, or drug addiction
decision making capacity
patient makes and communicates a choice

patient is informed

decision is stable over time

decision is consistent with patient values and goals

decision is not a delusion or hallucination
advance directives
given by patient in anticipation of need for medical decision

oral - use as a guide, but variance in interpretation is a problem

living will (Written) - describes which treatments patients will or will not receive if patient is incapacitated

durable power of attorney - surrogate in event patient loses decision making capacity
exceptions to confidentiality
potential harm to others

likelihood of harm to self

no alt means to warn or protect those at risk

physician can still take steps to prevent harm - infectious diseases, tarasoff decision, child abuse, impaired auto drivers, suicidal patients
tarasoff decision
physician required to directly inform and protect potential victims from harm - may involve breach of confidentiality
malpractice
4Ds - duty, dereliction, damage, direct

requires that:
physician must have had duty to patient, he breached that duty, patient was harmed, and the breach of duty was what caused the harm

most common due to poor communication between physician and patient
if patient is noncompliant
assess reason fo noncopmliance, determine willingness of patient to change or undergo procedure

DO NOT attempt to coerce or refer to another physician
patient smokes and believes its good for him
ask how patients feels about smoking

offer advice on cessation if patient willing to make effort to quit
patients desires unnecessary procedure
understand why patient wants procedure

avoid unnecessary procedure, address underlying concern

DO NOT refuse to see patient or refer patient
patient has difficulty taking mediations
provide written instructions

attempt to simplify treatment registration
family members ask for information about prognosis
avoid discussion with relatives without permission of patient
child wishes to know more about his illness
ask parents what they've told child

patients decide what information is given to kid
a 17 year old girl is pregnant and requests abortion
many states require parental notification or consent for minors for abortion

do not advise patient to have abortion unless there is medical risk
15 year old girl is preg and wants to keep child but parents want you to tell her to give up child
patient retains right to make decision regarding child even if parents disaggree

provide info about difficulty of caring for child

discuss other options

encourage communication between parent and child
terminally ill patient requests physician assistence in ending his life
most states you must refuse involvement in physician assisted suicide

but, physicians can prescribe medically appropriate analgesics that coincidentally shorten the patient's life
patient is suicidal
assess seriousness of threat

if serious, ask that patient remain in hospital. if he refuses, involuntary hospitalize patient
patient states that he finds you attractive
ask, direct, closed-ended questions and use chaparone

romantic relationships with patients are NEVER appropriate (even if not your patient anymore)
middle aged married woman who had mastectomy says she feels ugly when she undresses at night
find out why patient feels this way

DO NOT offer falsely reassuring statements
patient is angry about the amount of time spent waiting
acknowledge patient anger, don't take it personally

apologize for any inconvenience

don't try to explain the delay
patient is upset with the way she was treated by another doctor
suggest patient talk to offending doctor

if it was with a office staff, tell patient you will speak to that individual
drug company offers "referral fee" for every patient physician enrolls in study
eligible patients who may benefit may be enrolled, but not acceptable to physician to receive compensation from drug company
APGAR score
appearance
pulse
grimace
activity
respiration

evaluated at 1 and 5 minutes
low birth weight
< 2500g

higher incidence of physical and emotional problems

prematurity or intrautarine growth restruction

complications: infection, respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, persistent fetal circulation
infant dev molestones
birth - 3mo: rooting reflex, ortients to voice

3: holds headup moro reflex disappears, social smile

7-9mo sits alone, crawls, stranger anxiety

15mo walks, babinski disappears, few words, separation anxiety
toddler dev milestones
12-24mo - clinb stairs, stacks 3 blocks at 1 year, 6 blocks by 2 years, number of blocks stacked = aged in years x 3, object permanence, 200 words and 2 word sentences at age 2

24-36mo: core gender identity, parallel play
preschool dev milestones
30-36mo:stacks 9 blocks, toilet training

3 years: tricycle, copies lines or circles, 900 words and complete sentences

4 years: simple drawings, hops on 1 foot, cooperative play, imaginary friends, grooms self, brush teeth, buttons, zips
tanner stages of sexual dev
1. childhood
2. pubic hair appears (adrenarch, breasts enlarge)
3. pubic hair darkens and curly, increased penis length
4. penis width increases, darker scrotum, dev of glans, raised areolae
5. adult - areolae no longer raised
changes in elderly
sexual changes - men slower erection/ejactulation with longer refractory, female vaginal shortening, thinning, dry

sleep - decreased REM, slow wave sleep and increased latency to sleep and awakenings

decreased psych disorders

increased suicide rate

decreased vision, hearing, immune, bladder control

decreased renal, pulm, GI function

decreased muslce, increase fat
T/F sexual interest decreases in elderly
FALSE
T/F intelligence does not decrease in old age
TRUE
grief (normal)
normal berevement chracterized by shock, denial, guilt, somatic symptoms - up to 2 months

may experience illusions
grief (pathological)
excessive grief, prolonged > 2 months or grief that is delayed, inhibited, or denied

depressive symptoms, delusions, hallucination
kubler ross grief stages
denial, anger, bargaining, grieving, acceptance

"death arrives bring grave adjustments"

not necessarily in an order and can have more than 1 stage at a time
stress effects
stress induces production of free fatty acids, 17OH corticosteroids -> immunosupression, lipids, cholesterol, catecholamines

affect water absorption, muscular tonicity, gastrocolic reflex, mucosal circulation
sexual dysfunction differential
drugs (antihypertensives, neruoleptics, SSRI, ethanol)

disease (depression, diabetes)

psych (performance anxiety)
body mass index
weight in kg/(height in meters)^2

<18.5 underweight

18.5-24.9 normal

25-29.9 overweight

>30.0 obese

>40 morbidly obese
sleep stages % of total sleep time in young adults
stage 1 - 5%

stage 2 - 45%

stage 3-4 - 25%

REM - 25%
beta waves ECG
indicate awake (eyes open), alert, active mental
alpha waves ECG
awake (eyes closed)
theta waves ECG
light sleep

slowed pulse and respiration, decreased BP, episodic body movement
sleep spindles/K complexes on ECG
stage 2 sleep - deeper sleep, bruxism
delta waves ECG
stage 3 sleep

high amplitude, low freq

deepest sleep non-REM

sleep walking, night terrors, bedwetting
REM sleep
see sawtooth beta waves mostly

occurs every 90 minutes with increasing duration through night

dreaming, loss of motor tone, erection, increased brain O2 use

possible memory processing
raphe nucleus
secretes serotonin

key to initiating sleep
T/F NE increased REM sleep
false - NE decreases REM sleep
extraocular movements during REM are due to
activity of PPRF
treatment for enuresis
imipramine - decreases stage 4 sleep
reduced REM sleep - drugs
alcohol, benzodiazepine, barbs
treatment for night terrors and sleepwalking
benzos
principle neurotransmitter in REM sleep
ACh
why is REM sleep like sex
increased pulse, penile/clitoral tumescence

decreases with age
depresssion effect on sleep
decreased slow wave sleep

decreased REM latency

increased REM early

increased total REM sleep

repeated night wakening

early morning wakening
narcolepsy
disordered reg of sleep wake cycle

excessive daytime sleepiness

hallucinations before or just after sleep

starts with REM sleep

cataplexy - loss of all muscle tone follow strong emotional stim
treatment for narcolepsy
treat with stimulants (amphetamines, modafinil) and sodium oxybate
circadian rhythem
driven by suprachiasmatic nucleus of hypothalamus - regulated by environment (light) -> NE release -> pineal gland -> melatonin

controls ACTH, prolactin, melatonin, nocturnal NE release
sleep terror disorder
screaming in the middle of night

children mostly

occurs with slow wave sleep and no memory of arousal