• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/83

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

83 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Dred Scott v. Sanford

Denied blacks citizenship


Overturned Missouri Compromise


Controversy resulted in Civil war

13th amendment

banned slavery, involuntary servitude

14th amdnement

Due process clause


-states cant limit fundamental liberties


Equal protection clause


-All people in US deserve equal protection under the law


Citizenship clause


-All people born in the US are US citizens

15th amendment

Can't deny voting rights on race

Civil Rights act of 1875

Banned segregation in public

Civil Rights act of 1883

Overturned CRA 1875


rules 14th amdndment only applied to states and not individuals

Plessy v Ferguson

Upheld "Separate but Equal" doctrine

Voting barriers

Literacy Test


Poll Taxes


Grandfather Clause

NAACP

Formed in 1909, major interest group

Brown v. Board of Education

Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson


-separate implied inferiority


-public school segregation declared unconstitutional


-desegregation "with all deliberate speed"(slow integration)

De Jure Segregation

Segregation by law

De Facto Segregation

Segregation because of economic or social factors (still prevalent)

Reaction to Brown v. Board

-"White Flight"


-Busing (lower courts ordered this to fix de facto


-Swann v. Charlotte(upheld brown v. board)


-Busing Controversy(unpopular, phased out by most areas)





Modern civil rights is needed because

-Discrimination intensified post Brown Decision


-Fed government needed to intervene

Civil Rights Act of 1964

-Ended segregation/discrimination based on gender, race, religion or national origin


*Grassroot movement lobbied congress


*LbJ convinced enough southern democrats to support


*survived a 57 day filibuster in senate

Provisions to CRA 1964

-no equal voter registration requirements


-no discrimination in public


-withdrawal of funds from discriminatory programs


-Outlawed discrimination in employment

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

created to review complaints and investigate business and hiring practices

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. Us

-Challenged CRA of 1964


-CRA of 1964 was upheld

Motel owners argument

-13th amendment and 5th amendment rights have been violated

Government's argument

-Commerce Clause

Voting Rights Act of 1965

-outlawed discriminatory voting tests


-authorized a federal registration of citizens


(African american registration was very low)

CRA of 1968: Fair housing act

-forbade discrimination in ho

using, lending discrimination

19th amdnemdnt

states could not deny women the right to vote

Equal Pay act of 1963

pay could not based on gender

National Organization of Women (NOW

-formed in 1966, leading feminist organization


-helps protect abortion rights

Equal Rights Amendments

-equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged on accout of sex


-approval in congress in 1972


-never ratified by states

The education amendments of 1972 aka Patsy Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act

-added to CRA of 1964


-expanded women's opportunities


-led to a cut in Men's programs


(ex. % of men and women athletes must be equal)

University of CA v. Bakke

Gratz v. Bollinger 2003 upheld the decision

Lawrence v. Texas

overturned a state ban on private acts between adults

Defense of Marriage act (DOMA)

federal law prohibiting federal recognition of same sec marriage. The law was overturned by the supreme court

Obergefell v. Hodges

Grants the right to marry same sex couples

Civil Liberties

-limitations on government action


-things the government cant take away

Bill of rights

restrictions originally placed on the federal government

1

5 freedoms

2

bear arms

3

no quartering of soldiers

4

search and siezure

5

plead the fifth, double jeapordy, due process

Barron v. Baltimore

Bill of Rights only applies to the federal government, state laws can restrict a perosn's liberties

Due process clause of 14th amendment

not every amendment applies to the state

Gitlow v. New York

free speech and press are basic rights

Selective Incorporation

The Bill of rights applied to the states one by one over time through one case at at a time

1st amdndment

freedom of religion

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)

limits public money to private religous schools

Lemon test

Guidelines for future cases

3 part test

the aid had to be secular in its aim

Rehnquist court

lowere "wall of separation

Rosenberger v. University of VA

allowed a student christian newsletter to be funded by the uniersity

Free exercise clause

freedom of religion but religious practice can't conflict with broader policy

Reynold v. US

A challenge by Mormons to polygamy lawas


(Mormons lost bc they can regulate your actions but not beliefs)

Oregon v. Smith

native drug counselors fired for using peyote in religious ceremony

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act 1993

required states to accommodate religious conduct unless a compelling reason not to

allowed restrictions to freedom of expression

Clear and present danger


Character Defamation

Schenck v. US

speech that causes clear and present danger can be restricted

Dennis v. US

-modifies clear and present danger test


-doesnt have to be imminent danger

Bradenburg v. Ohio

-Only speech that causes imminent lawlessness can be restricted

-overturns Schenck and Dennis



Slander

falsely spoken words



Libel

falsely written words

NY Times v. Sullivan

Libel must be with Malicious intent

Miller v. California

Miller Test


-average person finds it violates community standards


-shows offensive sexual conduct


-As a whole lacks any serious redeeming literary, artistic, political, or scientific merit =obscene



Near v. Minnesota

no prior restraint

NY times v. Us 1971

-government must show cause for using "national security" to restrain press


-strengthened no prior restraint

Tinker v. Des Moines

Protest arm bands were protected, did not disrupt school

Texas v. Johnson

Over turned flag buring laws

Griswold v. Connecticut

declares privacy a constitutional right


IMPLIED by:


3,4, and 9th amendments

Roe v. Wade

-Abortion was considered a privacy right


-Overturned state laws banning it


-must allow exceptions for health of mother

Modification to Wade


*Webster v. Reproductive Health Services

states can pass laws that deny public funding of abortion

Planned Parenthood v. Casey


(modification to wade)

-upheld required pre-abortion counseling


-24 hour waiting period


-parental notification for those under 18

Partial birth abortions

some states banned, laws were considered unconstitutional

Gonzales v. Carhart

Upheld the ban on partial birth abortions

1976 case Karen Quinlan

terminally ill can refuse treatment

Cruzan v. Director Missouri Dept of Health

Must be clear and convincing evidence of patient's wishes to withdraw treatment

eminent domain

government can take your property

3,4,9,14,14

allude to right of privacy

9th

rights not listed go to the people

What was Gideon's criminal record like?

4 times jailed, 3 times burglary, 1 time fed property theft (past felon drifter)

What was Gideon's sentence for Liquor Store Rob?

5 yrs

what were the 3 steps gideon took?

1. petition florida court for writ of habeus corpus,


2. ask US supreme court to issue a writ of certiorari,


3. send an in forma pauperis application

What would be special circumstances?

illiteracy, incompetence, complex charges, disadvantages.

Did gideon have special circumstances?

no



Abe Fortas (gideons attourney) says no special circumstances is perfect to challenge what previous decision?

THE BETTS DECISION

What 2 motions did Gideon file IN court?

1. rule against double jeopardy (but invalid, it's his own appeal)


2. Two-year statute of limitations

What was the end product of Gideon's trial?

-No man can have a fair trial without a defense council.


-Gideon was found not guilty because he himself questioned the main witness, the boy outside the robbery, Gideon find a technicality that he couldn't have seen through the window and looked at Gideon because there was stuff in the way.