• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/44

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

44 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

marquis: abortion

all abortions, except in rare instances are wrong


maqruis arguments:

all human have right to life


-fetus is a human, therefor a fetus has the right to life


-too broad that all humans have right to life

marquis pro choice argument:

only persons have right to life


-fetus is not a person


-therefore a fetus doesn't have a right to life

m: why does he think nah about pro choice?

-"only person that has the right to life is too narrow of a statement"


-why can't everyon



m: whats wrong with killing others, you & me?

-killing someone imposes premature death


-one is dead, one is deprived of a future


-deprived of FLO

m: 4 arguments for FLO

-permanent unconcsiouness


-no flo so its fine


-severe irremediable pain


- no FLO, we gucci


-peaceful non human alien


-maybe depends on FLO

m: how does he respond to objection that fetus do not have moral standing?

-bcuz you're preventing it from FLO, it won't have interests or developed interests that could possibly happen

m: how does he respond that contraception is morally wrong

-if you use contraception, you're preventing a future


*****- for this to happen, you have to reject his views because he has plausible arguments


-is a being deprived of flo?


-people say yes because it prevents egg and sperm to mix


-marquis says no "no actual non arbitrary identifiable entity" is deprived of a FLO

t: what anti abortion premise does thomspon grant for the sake of argument?

-at the time of conception, a fetus is person

t: violinist

-didnt know you were connected


-should they stay plugged


-don't have to, not your problem


-meant to show rape

t: how does thompson argue against the view that the right to life is right to whatever one needs to survive? (henry fonda)

-thompson believes all persons have the right to life


-right not to be killed unjustly



t: how does she argue against the view that the right to life is a right not to be killed?

-right to not be killed unjustly is the right to life

t: according to thompson, under what circumstance does an abortion violate a fetus's right to life?

-it's killed unjustly



t: when is a fetus killed unjustly?

-when its deprived of the use of the womans body if it has the right to it


-when it has the right the woman says YES

t: what criterion for "giving something a right" does thompson mean to challenge with her "burglar" and "people seed" examples? explain those examples and what Thompson thinks they show about abortion in various circumstances.

- you know'em


-**** goes through, take it out, you din't say yes

t: explain thommpason "box of chocolates" examples. distinction between two kinds of moral wrongs is it to illustrate?

-has the chocolate


-is it morally wrong he won't share, has plenty. doesn't have to


-yea it's selfish but no right to it


-relates to unjust killing- if a box was given to two bros jointly and one kept'em all- it's unjust

t: explain diff between good samaritan and being minimally decent samaritan

good sam:-goes out of way all the time to help others; does not refuse


-min dec sam: no law that says they must do it, they can but don't have to if they don't want to

t: thompson employ these concepts in talking about whether women have an obligation to carry unwanted fetuses to term?

thompson says the woman must accept fetus to have it


-must give it rights, if not ba- bye

t: relevance her of burden involved with pre and childbirth

-childbirth risky, can die, so can the baby



j: three philosophical q's about abortion

1.concerns metaphysical and moral status: of zygotes, embryos, and fetus; do they have moral value?


2. ethics of abortion: when it is ethically permissible for an individual to seek or assist an abortion?


3. political morality: what principles or standards should societies invoke in designing laws and public policies that limit or facilitate abortion?

J: distinctions between ethics and political philosophy

ethics: focus on personal or private life

p: on matters of gov't and pub policy

j: liberalism

poli phil; form enlightenment; basic moral equality among people

j: feminism

gender justice- not unfairly allocating benefits on basis of gender

j: non-ideal methodological approach

-abortion is not self-contained issue of political morality


-it is fundamental rights and equality of all citizens

j: real-world circumstances of gender (in)justice (eight assumptions)

-male or female cuz genitalia

-masculine or feminine based on sex categorization


-some broad commonalities can be discerned in gender institutions across the world


-mas and fem are unequal in status


-humans reproduce sexually, women bear children following sexual intercourse with men


-human infants are born helpless= physical, emotional, and intellectual care and attention


-need high quality child rearing by parents


-parents more on woman than man


-child bearing is heavy, women have sought to control fertility

j: real-world abortion (facts, history, methods)

gotta read that **** page 133-134

j: three principles of political morality regarding abortion

-all girl should have full freedom to decide whether to continue or terminate pregnancy


-all girls should be enabled to exercise this right


-social institutions should be designed to reduce the likelihood of unwanted pregnancy

j: meaning and relevance of slogan "women rights are human rights"

-women are entitled to the same rights as men


-need sexual reproductive rights

j: sexual and reproductive rights

-rape, incest, sexual assult, impairment, and continuing preg that endangers life or health of women+abortion allowed=explicit



j: women's right to life (relevance to abortion rights)

-securing abortion rights is indispensable to guaranteeing women's right to life


-legal abortion available for life-threatening

j: right to liberty

denying abortion violates right to liberty


-constrained liberty for 2 decades



j: right to bodily integrity

-forced pre violates women's right to bodily integrity, same with forced abortion



j: relevance of abortion rights to gender equality

-ex of military= only men, well then.....


-sex specific nature of pre means that this service can presently be required only of women


-restrictions on abortion offened constitution, equal protection laws

j: public health affects denying abortion rights

-where abortion is restricted by law, abortion rates are not lower but procedure is safe


-when its illegal, less safe


-deaths and disabilities caused by illegal, unsafe abortions


j: effects of abortion rights (lack on pop and econ development)

-instrumentalism, which prevent improvement in women's status


-lack of analysis of the deep structural causes of women's impoverishents




-if have rights, can develop edu opportunities

j: arguments against fetal right to life: humanity

Human rights trump all other considerations. Nothing can justify violating human rights.

j: arguments against fetal right to life: personhood

Personhood is a moral status that belongs typically but not necessarily to all humans. For example people who are permanently comatose.

j: arguments against fetal right to life:: potential personhood

Suggested criteria for personhood include self-consciousness, rationality, and the ability for moral reflection.

j: her view of fetal value

-later stage have greater fetal value than early fetus


-later stage are developed, meaning, more sentient

j: arguments against legal restrictions on late-term and selective abortions

-presence of minor or major disabilities and desire to have


- baby: likely to be painful and short


-double check this one

j: herarguments that no one’s freedom of conscience is violated by public provisionof abortion, or by the abolition of “conscience clauses”

-gov't ensure ability of abortion in health care services


-tax payers, medical personnel, and institutional health care provider

j: Wolf-Devine’s argument that abortion violatesfeminist values, and Jaggar’s response(s)

-"highly sophisticated tech" used in abortion


j response: abortion has been around for 1,000 years


-abortion is "bloody and distressing"


j: all pregs. are bloody


-want to dismiss fam network


j response: scared of what family will do/say

j: evidencethat abortion does not encourage general disrespect for human life

-abortion won't lead to slippery slope (euthanasia, capital punishment etc)


-they felt on human rights frameworks

j: lesson/insight Jaggar draws from her own two unplanned pregnancies

-wasn't planning, decided to have babies but could get abortion


-doesn't have resentment since she could choose