Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
82 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
What is genetics a product of?
|
Evolution
|
|
|
Micro evolution
|
within species evolution. Changes in allele frequencies
|
|
|
Macro evolution
|
phenotypica changes over really long periods of time
|
|
|
Hypothesis
|
tentative explanation that accounts for a set of facts and can be tested for further investigation
|
|
|
Theory
|
interconnected statements based on reasoning and evidence that explain a variety of observations and phenomena.
|
|
|
Did whales evolve from land dwelling ancestor?
|
Yes
|
|
|
There is a wolf-like animal that was possibly the ancestor to whales. What part was this based on?
|
Bulla (Bone in middle ear) had bone called involucrum which is only today present in whales.
|
|
|
Transitional form
|
species exhibit traits shared by groups, especially when groups are differentiated
|
|
|
Other than whales, what other animals shared an involucrum?
|
Pakicetus, ambulocetus
|
|
|
Why is the O18 isotope important?
|
It is more common in sea water than freshwater. By finding the ratio of O18 to O16, you can see if an animal lived is fresh or sea water
|
|
|
First drug of HIV?
|
Azidothymindine, orAZT. It was ineffective after 5 months and after 2 years wasn’t effective
|
|
|
How did AZT provide natural selection for HIV?
|
It killed off only the strains of HIV which were sensitive to AZT. What survived continued to replicate.
|
|
|
Basics of HIV virus?
|
2 copies of RNA, 3 enzymes. Pain in the ass to treat
|
|
|
C868T
|
Mutation which makes you MORE likely to contract HIV
|
|
|
CD4-Delta2
|
Mutation which provides HIV resistance
|
|
|
How was the drug cocktail discovered as a treatment option for HIV?
|
Someone was sick and they took him off of his medicine. Then after time, he went back on and the virus was susceptible to the orig drug again
|
|
|
What do evo biologists study?
|
Pattern v process, phylogeny vs telling a story, proximate (how do you do physiology) vs ultimate causation (why migrate)
|
|
|
Frequency dept selection
|
when an idividual’s fitness depends on the freq of it’s phenotype in the population; typically occurring when a phenotype has a higher fitness when it is rare and lower fitness when it is common.
|
|
|
Teleology
|
the doctrine of final causes, i.e. that nat and historical processes are determined by their ultimate purpose. EVO DOESN’T WORK THIS WAY
|
|
|
Catastrophism
|
Today’s geological formations resulted from a catastrophic event in the past on a scale never observed today (Noah’s Arc)
|
|
|
Uniformitarianism
|
geological processes taking place now worked similarly in the past
|
|
|
Who is the father of geology and why?
|
Hutton. He suggested uniformitarianism
|
|
|
Who did Lyell follow?
|
Hutton
|
|
|
Who did Darwin follow?
|
Lyell
|
|
|
Relative dating
|
Techniques for assigning relative ages to rock strata based on the relationships between newer and older rocks.
|
|
|
What was used to create the geologic time table
|
relative dating
|
|
|
What were the 4 rules of relative dating
|
young rocks piled on old rocks, boulder and cobble were older than host, lava and sediment were horizontal and if it isn’t then something changed it to make it like that, certain fossils characterized certain rock types
|
|
|
Fossilization theory of the 1800s
|
supernatural forces killed off an animal, but they were still alive somewhere (Jefferson thought the new world had dinosaurs)
|
|
|
What does fossilization require?
|
Special circumstances.
|
|
|
What did plato teach?
|
Essentialism
|
|
|
What is the theory of essentialism?
|
Natural kinds can be defined in terms of props that are possessed by all and only members of that kind
|
|
|
What are the 3 things Aristotle preached?
|
Species are fixed and eternal. Essentialism. The great chain of being (Ladder thinking)
|
|
|
What is the Christian twist on the great chain of being?
|
God made life, life is non changing, humans are the link between angels and animals
|
|
|
Is linnaen taxonomy hierarchial or linear?
|
HIERARCHIAL
|
|
|
What did Linnaeus do?
|
Binomial nomenclature.
|
|
|
What is the binomial nomenclature?
|
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species
|
Kinky people come over for group sex
|
|
Taxon
|
any taxonomic unit
|
|
|
Higher Taxa
|
those above species level
|
|
|
Taxonomy
|
naming describing and classifying species. Done by specialist.
|
|
|
Systematics
|
How species are related to one another. Not done by specialists.
|
|
|
Who was Lamark
|
Proposed evolution
|
|
|
How was lamark wrong?
|
No extinction, gradualism, non branching, many origins of life, inheritance of acquired characters
|
|
|
Inheritance of acquired characters
|
giraffes stretching out necks over time for food
|
|
|
Who was Darwin
|
developed idea of natural selection, wrote the origin of species. PROPOSED DESCENT WITH MODDIFICATION.
|
|
|
Anagenesis
|
the part of the branch which denotates a shared common ancestor
|
|
|
Cladogenesis
|
the part of the branch which is the node.
|
|
|
Who came up with phylogeny and ecology
|
Ernst Haeckel
|
|
|
Methods for tree categorization
|
Numerical taxonomy, phylogenetic systematics, cladistics, statistically oriented molecular evolutionists
|
|
|
Phenetics
|
fucos on similarity for basis for classification
|
|
|
Numerical taxonomy
|
Basically, give up. Phylogeny is unknowable. Group by similarity and focus on statistical methods of classification.
|
|
|
Phylogenic systematics
|
Phylogeny is the central organizing principle of systematics. Phylogenies can be accurately constructed from comparisons of extant taxa, classification should be based directly on phylogenies.
|
|
|
Cladistics
|
same thing as phylogenetic systematics. Phylogeny is the central organizing principle of systematics. Phylogenies can be accurately constructed from comparisons of extant taxa, classification should be based directly on phylogenies.
|
|
|
Father of phylogenetic systematics
|
henning
|
|
|
Parents of numerical taxonomy
|
sokal and sneath
|
|
|
What do cladists now often refer to?
|
Those opposed to statistical approaches. It’s kind of crap.
|
|
|
Phylogeny
|
diagram depicting evolutionary relationships among a group of organisms. Often presented in a form that is hierarchial and looks something like a tree.
|
|
|
Clade
|
Start at a node. Everything. Everything past that node is in a clade. So if you look at ophistocanths, it will cover fungi through animals.
|
|
|
Is a whale more closely related to the common ancestor between camels and all other mammals, or hippos?
|
Hippo!
|
|
|
Define phylogenetic tree
|
interbreeding across generations through a population through time creating a population through time, connected to all of the populations within a species through time. The species can persist, go extinct, or split into two lineages.
|
|
|
Node
|
most recent common ancestor
|
|
|
Tip
|
formally named group or organisms. Same as taxon or taxa
|
|
|
Internode
|
the branch/points between nodes.
|
|
|
Monophyletic group
|
a clade
|
|
|
Paraphyletic group
|
ancestor and some but not all of its descendants
|
(grouping reptilian without aves)
|
|
Polyphyletic group
|
a group that is not united by a common ancestor that is a member of that taxon. THESE ARE NOT CLADES. It would be like grouping together aves with mamalia. THIS IS NOT CORRECT however, it’s a grouping Methodism
|
|
|
Problems with paraphyly
|
classifications of higher taxa should be based on common descent. It misleads relationships.
|
|
|
Where do you see paraphyly in Herpetology
|
You are looking at the study of amphibians and reptiles and FORGET TO INCLUDE A LITTLE CHIRP
|
|
|
Autapomorphy
|
derived character found in only one taxon in a tree. Doesn’t provide evidence for relationships
|
|
|
Synapomorphy
|
shared, derived character. Provides evidence of common descent
|
|
|
Synaplesiomorphy
|
shared ancestral character. A cause of phenotypic similarity but doesn’t provide evidence of common descent. NOT EVIDENCE OF RELATEDNESS
|
|
|
Are scales a synapomorphy or symplesiomorphy of Reptilia?
|
Synap.
|
|
|
Does the presence of scales imply that crocs and lizards are most closely related to one another?
|
No. This is a symplesiomorphy
|
|
|
Convergent evolution
|
a similarity between species is caused by similar but evolutionarily independent response to a common set of selection pressures
|
|
|
Homology
|
similar traits among different species (think of bones in arm/hand)
|
|
|
Homoplasy
|
similarity in the characters found in different species that is due to convergent evolution, parallelism, or reversal, but NOT common descent. So you’re similar to eachother, but not closely related.
|
|
|
Reversal
|
re-evolving ancestral state from a derived state
|
|
|
What is the most parsimonious explanation for the evolution of a camera-like eye?
|
Convergent evolution
|
|
|
. How would this change if eyes were a homologous trait and not parsimonious?
|
|
|
|
Parallelism
|
evolution of the same character trait in closely related taxa. The same developmental pathway is often employed.
|
|
|
3 causes of homoplasy
|
reversal, convergent evolution, parallelism
|
|
|
3 kinds of similarities
|
symplesiomorphies (shared, primitive), synapomorphies (shared, derived), homoplasy (FALSE homology)
|
|
|
Of the three kinds of similarities, which provides evidence of common ancestry?
|
Synapomorphies.
|
|