Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
6 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Character Evidence, Other Acts, Outline
|
(1) Intro, (2) Another Purpose, (3) Habit/Routine
|
|
Character Evidence, Other Acts
|
Evidence of a crime, wrong, or other act is not admissible to prove a person’s character in order to show that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character. [Rule 404(b)(1)] However, such evidence may be admissible for (1) another purpose, or (2) evidence of habit or routine practice.
|
|
Character Evidence, Other Acts, Another Purpose
|
Evidence of a crime, wrong, or other act may be admissible for another purpose, such as proving (1) motive, (2) intent, (3) absence of mistake, (4) identity, AND (5) common plan or scheme, among others. [Rule 404(b)(2)]
|
|
Character Evidence, Other Acts, Another Purpose, Requirements
|
If the evidence is independently relevant, to be admissible: (1) there must be sufficient evidence to support a jury finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the wrongful conduct occurred, AND (2) its probative value must not be substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.
|
|
Character Evidence, Other Acts, Habit/Routine Practice
|
Evidence of a person’s habit or an organization’s routine practice may be admitted to prove that on a particular occasion the person or organization acted in accordance with the habit or routine practice. [Specific behavior—the more specific the better (e.g., driver’s tendency to be accident prone or “safe” = too general, but a driver’s practice of always honking at a blind interaction or taking particular routes is specific).] [Regularity—requires a “sufficient number of times” to constitute habit; it should be “predictive.”][Automatic—conduct is more likely to be habit when it is semiautomatic or unreflective behavior.]
|
|
Character Evidence, Other Acts, Habit/Routine Practice, Requirements
|
The court may admit this evidence regardless of whether it is corroborated or whether there was an eyewitness.
|