• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/4

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

4 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What are the 3 considerations when determining if evidence is relevant?
1. Logical relevance
2. Legal relevance
3. Doctrine of limited admissibility
What is logical relevance and what rule covers it?
FRE 401 states that evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
What is legal relevance and what rule covers it?
FRE 403 states that otherwise relevant evidence may still be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
What is Nevada's rule concerning legal relevance?
Court MUST exclude evidence if the probative value is is substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice or confusion

May exclude for waste of time