Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
62 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
AUTONOMY
|
1. ADDRESSES PERSONAL FREEDOM AND SELF DETERMINATION
2. RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO ONE'S OWN PERSON 2. |
|
|
WHAT IS THE LEGAL DOCTRINE OF INFORMED CONSENT?
|
IS A DIRECT REFLECTION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY
|
|
|
AUTONOMY INVOLVES HEALTH CARE DELIVERERS' RESPECT WHAT OF PATIENT'S?
|
FOR PATIENT'S RIGHTS TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THEIR CARE AND TREATMENT EVEN IF YOU DONOT AGREE WITH IT
|
|
|
WHEN DOES ONE RESTRICT A PATIENT'S AUTOMONY?
|
1. WHEN THE PATIENT ENDANGERS ANOTHER PATIENT
2. IN THE CASE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES |
|
|
BENEFICENCE
|
The ethical principle that requires one to act in ways that benefit another. In research, this implies the protection from harm & discomfort, including a balance between the benefits & risks of a study.
|
|
|
BENEFICENCE
|
THAT ACTION ONE TAKES SHOULD PROMOTE GOOD
|
|
|
WHAT IS THE DIFFICULTY IN BENEFICENCE
|
DEFINING THE TERM GOOD
|
|
|
NAME WAYS THAT GOOD IS DEFINED WHEN CARING FOR PATIENTS (BENEFICENCE)
|
1. ALLOW THE PATIENT TO DIE WITHOUT ADVANCE LIFE SUPPORT
2. WHEN NURSES ENCOURAGE PAINFUL TREATMENTS IF THE PATIENT'S QUALITY OF LIFE IS IMPROVED 3. MAY USE THIS PRINCIPLE WHEN VIEWING LONG TERM OUTCOMES OF INVASIVE AND NONINVASIVE PROCEDURES |
|
|
ETHICAL THEORIES INVOLVE
|
systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of appropriate and acceptable behaviors.
|
|
|
TWO BASIC KINDS OT ETHICS (THEORIES)
|
NON-NORMATIVE
NORMATIVE |
|
|
ANOTHER NAME FOR NON-NORMATIVE
|
METAETHICS
|
|
|
NON-NORMATIVE OR METAETHICS
|
EXPLORES WHETHER MORAL VALUES ARE EXTERNAL TRUTHS THAT EXIST IN AN "OTHERWORLDLY" REALM OR MEARELY ASPECTS OF HUMAN CONVENTIONS
|
|
|
WHAT DOES METAETHICS ATTEMPST TO DO
|
ANALYZE MEANING
JUSTIFICATION AND INFERENCESOF MORAL CONCEPTS AND STATEMENTS AND INVESTIGATING WHERE ETHICAL PRINICPLES ORGINATE AND WHAT THEY MEAN |
|
|
WHAT DO METAETHICS ATTEMPT TO DO?
|
DETERMINE WHAT IS GOOD OR WHY ONE SHOULD ACT IN A MORALISTIC MANNER
|
|
|
NORMATIVE ETHICS CONCERNS A MORE
|
PRACTICAL VIEW OF REGULATING RIGHT AND WRONG
|
|
|
NORMATIVE ETHICS
|
CONCERN NORMS OR STANDARDS OF BEHAVIOR AND VALUES ANT THE ULTIMATE APPLICATION OF THESE NORMS AND STANDARDS IN EVERYDAY LIFE
|
|
|
WHAT DO NORMATIVE ETHICS DO?
|
INVOLE QUESTIONS AND DILEMMAS REQUIRING A CHOICE OF ACTION
IT MAY ENTAIL A CONFLICTOF RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS ON THE PART OF THE DESICION MAKERS |
|
|
WHAT IS THE KEY ASSUMPTION IN NORMATIVE THEORIES
|
THAT THERE IS BUT ONE ULTIMATE CRITERION OF MORAL CONDUCT
|
|
|
WHAT DOES SEONTOLOGIC MEAN
|
IT IS FROM GREEK MEANING DUTY
|
|
|
NORMATIVE THEORITES?
|
THE BRANCH OF ETHICS CONCERNED WITH DETERMINING WHETHER AN ACTION IS RIGHT OR WRONG
|
|
|
WHAT DOES NORMATIVE THEORIES ATTEMPT TO DO/
|
TO DEVELOP A SET OF RULES OR NORMS THAT GOVERNING HUMAN CONDUCT
IT DEALS WITH WHAT PEOPLE SHULD BELIEVE TO BE RIGHT OR WRONG |
|
|
DESCRIPTIVE ETHICS BELIEVE
|
DEALS WITH WHAT PEOPLE ACTUALLY BELIEVE TO BE RIGHT OR WRONG
|
|
|
WHAT KIND OF ETHICS IS WHEN PEOPLE USE THE TERMS MORALITY OR ETHICS
|
MEAN NORMATIVE ETHICS FOR IT IS THIS BRANCH THAT IS CONCERNED WITH TELLING US HOW WE OUGHT TO LIVE OUR LIVES
|
|
|
WHAT DO DEONTOLOGISTS HOLD THAT A
|
IT IS ONES DUTY THAT CONSIST OF RATIONAL RESPECT FOR THE FULFILLING OF ONES OBLIGATIONS TO OTHER HUMAN BEINGS
|
|
|
WHAT IS THE GREATEST STRENGHT OF DENOTOLOGICAL
|
EMPHASIZES ON THE DIGNITY OF HUMAN BEINGS
|
|
|
2 TYPES OF DEONTOLIGCAL THEORIES
|
VITURE AND DUTY ETHICS
|
|
|
VITURE ETHICS
|
PLACES LESS EMPHASIS ON LEARNING RULES AND REGULATIONS ANO MORE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF GOOD CHARACTER AND HABITUALLY PERFORMING IN THE QUALITY CHARACTER MODE
|
|
|
LIST SEVERAL TYPES OF VITURE ETHICIS
|
WISDOM, COURAGE, TEMPERANCE JUSTICE FORTITUDE, GENEROSITY SELF-RESPECT, GOOD TEMPER AND SINCERITY
|
|
|
NAME THE FOUR CARDINAL VITURE THAT WAS EMPHSIZED BY PLATO
|
WISDOM
COURAGE TEMPERANCE JUSTICE |
|
|
WHAT DO VIRTUE ETHICISTS DENOUNCE
|
THE ACQUISITION OF BAD CHARACTER TRAITS, SUCH AS COWARDICE, INSENSIBILITY, INJUSTICE, AND VANITY
|
|
|
DUTY ETHICS
|
IS BASED ON THE PREMISE THAT THERE ARE SOME OBVIOUS OBLIGATIONS THAT ONE HAS A HUMAN BEING SUCH AS THE DUTY TO NOT COMMIT MURDER AND TO TELL THE TRUTH
|
|
|
DUTIES TO SELF INCLUDE
|
AVOIDING WRONGING OTHERS,
TREATING PEOPLE AS EQUALS, A AND PROMOTING THE GOOD OF OTHERS |
|
|
WHAT DO DEONTOLOGICL ETHICS LOOK AT
|
NOT THE CONSEQUENCE OF THE ACTION BUT TO THE INTENTION OF THE ACTION
|
|
|
SITUATION ETHICS
ALSO KNOWN AS LOVE ETHICS |
WHERE THE DECISION MAKER TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICS OF EACH INDIVIDUAL, THE CARING RELAIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PERSON AND THE CAREGIVES AND THE MOST HUMANISTIC COURSE OF ACTION GIVEN THE CIRUMSTANCES
|
|
|
LOVE ETHICS
|
CONVEYING THE DEEP RESPECT FOR THE HUMAN PERSON
|
|
|
DEONTOLOGICAL THEORIES CAN BE SUBDIVIDED INTO 2 MORE LEVELS
|
1. ACT DEONTOLOGY
2. RULE DEONTOLOGY |
|
|
ACT DEONITOLOGY
|
BASSES ON THE PERSONAL MOREAL VALUES OF THE PERSON MAKING ETHICAL DECISIONS
|
|
|
RULE DEONTOLOGY
|
BASED OAN THE BELIEF THAT CERTAIN STANDARDS FOR ETHICAL DECISIONS TRNASCENT HE PERSON MORAL VALUES
|
|
|
TELEOLOGICAL THEORIES
|
GREEK FOR END STATES THAT NORMS OR RULES FOR CONDUCT FROM THE CONSEQENCES OF ACTIONS
|
|
|
THE MOST ATTRACTIVE FEATURE OF TELEOLOGICAL WAS
|
YOU COULD QUICKLY DETERMINE OBVSERVALBE CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACTION WITH RIGHT CONSISTING OF ACTIONS THAT GOOD CONSQUENCES AND WRONG ACTIONS HAD BAD CONSEQUENCES.
|
|
|
UTILITARIANISM
|
IS TELEOLOGICL THEORY THAT WHAT MAKES AN ACTION RIGHT OR WONG IS ITS UTILITY WITH USEFUL ACTIONS BRINGING ABOUT THE GREATEST GOOD FOR THE GREATEST NUMBER OF PEOPLE.
|
|
|
UTILITARIANISM SUBDIVIDED INTO
|
RULE AND ACT UTILITARIANISM
|
|
|
RULE UTILITARIANISM
|
SEEKS THE GREATEST HAPPINESS FOR ALL.
|
|
|
ACT UTILITARIANISM
|
ATTEMPTS TO DETERMINES IN A GIVEN SITUATION WHICH COURSE OF ACTION WILL BRING ABOUT THE GREASTEST HAPPINESS, OR THE LEAST HARM AND SUFFERING TO A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL
|
|
|
UTILITARIANISM MAKES
|
HAPPINESS SUBJECTIVE
|
|
|
APPLIED ETHICS
|
IS THE BRANCH OF ETHICS THAT CONCERNS THE ANALYSIS OF SPECIFIC, CONTROVERSIAL MORAL ISSUES SUCH AS ABORTION, EUTHANASIAK, GENETIC MANIPULATION OF FETUSES AND THE STATUS OF UNUSED FROZEN EMBRYOS
|
|
|
TWO KEY THINGS NEED TO HAPPEN TO BECOME APPLIED ETHICS
|
1. THE ISSUE NEEDS TO BE CONTROBERSIAL WITH SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF PERSONS BOTH AND AGAINST IT
2. IS ISSUE MUST CONCERN A DISTINCLY MORAL ISSUE |
|
|
HOW TO YOU RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF APPLIED ETHICS
|
OFTEN USE ETHICAL PRINICIPALS RATHER THAN THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF ETHICAL THEORIES
|
|
|
PRINCIPALISM
|
INCORPORATES VARIOUS EXISTING ETHICAL PRINCIPALS AND ATTEMPTS TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS BY APPLYING ONE OR MORE OF THESE PRINCIPLES
|
|
|
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES CONTROL WHAT
|
PROFESSIONAL DECISION MAKING MORE THAN DO ETHICASL THEORIES
|
|
|
WHY WOULD YOU INCORPORATE PRINCIPALISM IN NURSING
|
BECASUE IT MAY EMPHASIZE THE VARIOUS ETHICAL PRINCIPLES AND CREATE MORE DELIBERATE WEIGHING OF ARGUMENT IN A POSITIVE LIGHT
|
|
|
RELATIONAL ETHICS
|
REDIRECTS THE ISSUE OF RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE THE PERSON TO THE RELATIONAL COMMITMENTS THAT INDIVIDUALS HAVE TO EACH OTHER
|
|
|
RELATIONAL ETHICS ALSO IS KNOWN FOR
|
PRACTICAL ACTION ORIENTED ETHICS
|
|
|
FOUR COMPONENTS OF RELATIONAL ETHICS
|
1. ENGAGEMENT
2. MUTUAL RESPECTS 3. EMBODIMENT 4. ENVIRONMENT |
|
|
ENGAGEMENT
|
ALLOWS COMMUNICATIONS TO BE EXPRESSED AND CONSIDERD THAT ALLOW BOTH THE RATINAL AND EMOTIONAL ASPECTS OF A PERSON'S LIFE BE INCLUDED IN ETHICAL DECISION MAKING
|
|
|
ENGAGEMENT
|
DENOTES A SHARED RELATIONSHIP WITH OBLIGATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES TO OTHER PERSONS
|
|
|
MUTUAL RESPECT
|
ACKNOOLEDGES DIFFERENCES AND INDIVIDUALLLY AND INCORPORATING A BROAD UNDERSTANDING OF CULTURE AND LANGUAGE AS THEY AFFECT ETHICAL PRINCIPALS AND ISSUES
|
|
|
EMBODIMENT
|
REFLECTS THE CONNECTION NEEDED BETWEEN PERSONS SO THAT INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THEM ARE MEANINGFUL AND FULLY ACKNOWLEDGE
|
|
|
ENVIRONMENT
|
INCLUDES THE BREADTH OF THE RELATIONSHIP MOVING BEYOUND PERSONALITIES SO THAT A BROADER RELATIONSHIP CAN BE ESTABLISHED
|
|
|
HOW DOES NURSING DECRIBE RELATIONAL ETHICS
|
DESCRIBED IN NURSING USING TERMS MUTUALITY AND CARING
|
|
|
WHAT DOES RELATIONAL ETHICS DO
|
ENGAGES ALL PARTIES TO A POTENTIAL DILEMMA ANC CREATES A DIALOGUE AND CONSDIETRS ALL POSSIBLE AND REALISTIC OUTCOMES
|
|
|
NAME ETHICAL PRINCIPALS THAT APPLY IN CLINICAL SETTINGS
|
AUTONOMY
BENEFICENCE NONMALEFICENCE VERACITY FIDELITY PATERNALISM JUSTICE RESPECT FOR OTHERS |
