• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/63

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

63 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Secular Eschatology
(THE BIG HZN)
The Singularity Eschatology
Hegel's Eschatology
Evolutionary Eschatology

Buddhist Eschatology
Islamic Eschatology
Greek Eschatology

Hindu Eschatology
Zoroastrian Eschatology
Norse Eschatology
The Singularity: A modern Eschatology
One: Physics and Chemistry (Big Bang and molecules)
Two: Biology and DNA
Three: Brains – ability to recognize patterns
Four: Technology – ability to manipulate the environment, etc.
Five: Merger of human technology w/ human intelligence (called posthumanism by some)
Six: The universe wakes up (it becomes God )
Hindu Eschatology
We live in the last of 4 periods in the current age (a pattern of degeneration)
Appearance of Kalki, 10th and last avatar of Vishnu
Evolutionary Eschatology
Assumption in Darwinian model is progress
Darwin may have inherited from theism
Implies an end or goal for evolution
Humanists: goal is humanity
Others: further human evolution
Buddhist Eschatology
Gradual loss of Buddha’s teachings
New Buddha (Maitreya) will arise and renew teachings
Islamic Eschatology
Isa (Jesus), who never died, will return to earth, end all wars and begin a period of peace
Heaven portrayed as a garden, a physical paradise
Greek Eschatology
Epicureans: no afterlife
Stoicism: ambiguity; focus on this life and attainment of virtue
Hegel's Eschatology
World is a progression
Contradictions of each age resolved in next
Thesis, antithesis, synthesis
Zoroastrian Eschatology
Gradual degeneration of the universe
A battle between righteous and wicked
Norse Eschatology
A strong Winter will overcome the earth
Fighting will break out between among humans
The Genre of Prophecy
The importance of prophecy - Vast material in OT; much apparently not yet fulfilled;
Key part of understanding NT: some has been fulfilled; some yet to be fulfilled
The difficulty of Prophecy - Use of symbols & figures;
The historical distance
Role of prophet
Isaiah 8:20
Covenant enforcement mediators - Hos 4:2
Blessings and cursings - Lev 26; Deut 28-32
Motivational
Explaining Prophecy
Communication of God’s word through a human spokesperson
Primary focus: forthtelling not foretelling
- Not all is predictive
- All is relevant to present or near future
How to Interpret Prophecy
Recognize figures of speech, sub-genre
- Includes speech, narrative, poetry
Recognize Prophetic Oracles
- Lawsuit oracle: Is 1
- Woe oracle: Is 5
- Promise Oracle: Is 41
Recognize prophetic perspective
Distinguish covenant promises from general promises
Understanding Apocalyptic
Prophets use common idioms and forms
One contemporary form: apocalyptic
- Common from 200 B.C. to A.D. 200
- Highly symbolic picture of God defeating enemies
- Includes visions, dreams, cryptic messages

Implication: If Revelation is apocalyptic, must follow rules of apocalyptic!
- Different conclusions about genre lead to different interpretations!
Backgound Biblical Covenants
Center of Biblical Revelation: covenant
-Berit: covenant, contract, treaty
-Diatheke (Greek)
“Secular” covenants:
-Abraham & Abimelech (Gen 21:
-David & Jonathan (1 Sam 18)
-Jacob and Laban (Gen 31)
What is A Covenant
Simply: a contract, agreement, promise
Elements of a covenant
Related biblical ideas:
- Election, “covenant formula” (I will be your God…”) Neh 9:8
Term for “fellowship enabling relationship”
Classifying Covenants
Conditional Covenants
- Fulfillment depends on specific conditions
Unconditional covenants
- Fulfillment for any specific individual or generation is conditional
- Final and ultimate fulfillment is dependent only on will of the covenant maker
Theological Covenants
Noahic Covenant
Gen 6;
Abrahamic Covenant
Gen 12,
Mosaic Covenant
Ex 19-24;
Davidic Covenant
2 Sam 7
New Covenant
Jer 31
Abrahamic Covenant
Its content
- Descendents: great nation (Gen. 12)
- Land (15)
- Blessing (12)
Conditional or unconditional?
- Lack of explicit conditions in Gen 12
- Covenant symbolism of Gen 15
- Role of circumcision: sign of covenant (17:11; not a “condition” – cp. v. 9)
- Other Ot text Gen 50
Christological Fulfllment
Fulfillment in and through Christ
- Luke 1;
Relation to the Church
- Gal 3
- Does this rule out fulfillment to the nation of Israel?
Davidic Covenant
Content of the covenant: 2 Sam 7
- Descendants
- Eternal throne and kingdom
Conditional or Unconditional?
-Conditions for individual descendants (14)
-Repetition of forever, eternal language
-Divine act! (“I will”; “the Lord himself”)
Christological Fulfillment
Fulfilled in and through Christ
- Luke 1
Relation to the church?
- Parallel to other covenants (Abrahamic, New) Acts 13
New Covenant
Content of the Covenant: Jer 31
- Forgiveness (34)
- Spiritual transformation (33-34)
- National restoration (Ezek 34)
Conditional or unconditional?
-Said to be eternal, everlasting (Jer 32:40; Ez 37)
-Emphasis on divine action (“I will…”)
-Audience is spiritually rebellious nation!
Christological Fulfillment in the New Covenant
Fulfilled in and through Christ (Luke 22

Relation to the church
- New Cov. inaugurated at Pentecost (Acts 2)
- Real, but partial fulfillment (cp. 1 Thess 4:7-9)
- Is there a future fulfillment for Israel?
Covenant Theology
Also called Covenantalism, Federal Theology
Based on three “implicit” covenants:
Covenant of Works – with Adam and Eve
Obedience=life; disobedience=death; representative
Covenant of Redemption
Godhead’s agreement to provide redemption
Covenant of Grace
Historical expression of covenant of Redemption
Covenant Theology History
Primarily post-Reformation
Systematized by Cocceius (1603-1669)
Part of many later statements
Westminster Confession of Faith
Jonathan Edwards
Most Reformed Presbyterians
Covenant Theology Distinctives
Various biblical covenants are seen as administrations of the covenant of Redemption/Grace
History is bound together by soteriological unity (one covenant of grace)
Deemphasizes distinctions between OT and NT eras
Emphasizes NT fufillment passages as key to interpreting OT prophecies (vs. “literal”)

Covenant Thelogy and Eschatology

- One people of God implies: the church replaces/surpercedes Israel
- Future promised fullfillments to the church!
- Can have varied views on millennim
Dispensationalism
A dispensation is a distinguishable economy in the outworking of God’s plan. (Ryrie)

Dispensationalism: View that emphasizes the various dispensations as central to understanding God’s purpose in history.
History of Dispensationalism
Primarily post-1800
Major Early figure: John Nelson Darby
American adoption in 1850s & 1860s
- Niagara Bible Conference, James Brookes
Systematized and Popularized by Scofield
- Scofield Reference Bible, 1909
Key aspect of rise of evangelicalism
Updates/revisions in 1960s and 1970s
- Ryrie: Dispensationalism Today; New Scofield Bible
Key Features of Dispensationalism
Emphasizes development, progress
Emphasizes that God’s purposes are broader than just salvation of individuals
Ryrie’s sine qua non:
- Consistent literal hermeneutic
- Distinction between Israel and the church
- Doxalogical purpose of history
Name the Seven Dispensations
Innocence
Conscience
Human Government
Promise
Law
Grace
Millennium
Progressive Dispensationalism
Recent developments/changes
- Since the 1980s!
Question the sine qua non:
- Grammatical-historical interpretation evangelical consensus (not literal!)
- Distinction between Israel & church too strict
- Reformed theology is doxalogical too!
Historical analysis –movement is diverse
Varieties of Dispensationalism
There is no generic dispensationalism
Chronologically distinct phases:
Early dispensationalism
Scofield/Chafer: “classical”
Revised dispensationalism (Ryrie, Walvoord)
Progressive Dispensationalism
Distinct ecclesiastical traditions
Baptist, Presbyterian, Brethren, Pentecostal
Progressive Dispensational Emphases
Complementary hermeneutic
Fulfillment in church w/o abandoning future fulfillment for Israel
Already/Not yet focus in eschatology
“Inaugurated eschatology”
Greater continuity/less discontinuity
Unified Christological focus
Progressive Dispensational Emphases
Complementary hermeneutic
Fulfillment in church w/o abandoning future fulfillment for Israel
Already/Not yet focus in eschatology
“Inaugurated eschatology”
Greater continuity/less discontinuity
Unified Christological focus
Israel and the Church
In OT, Israel was God’s people
Ex 15:13; Hos 1:9-10; Is 62:4
The Church is now God’s people
2 Cor 6:16
What is the relationship between the two peoples?
Beginning of the Church: Church is a New Testament Institution
Covenant Theology suggests:
Begins with Adam, Abraham
Distinctively New Testament (disp. & others!)
Church not in OT (mystery): Eph 3:3-6, 9
Jesus taught it was future: Mt 16:18
Based on death of Christ: Eph 1:20-23
Resurrection/ascension: Eph 4:7-12
Spirit baptism: Acts 1:5; 2; 10 (1 Cor 12:13)
Does the Church replace Israel? (Supercessionism/Replacement Theology)
They are described in similar terms
Gal 3:29
1 Peter 2:9-10
They seem to be distinct in some passages
1 Cor 10:32
Most disputed text: Gal 6:15-16
Israel and the Church: Conclusions
They are similar in many ways
Same God, salvation by faith, some obligations
They are different in key ways
Different offices, practices, obligations
New Testament holds out hope for a future for national/ethnic/political Israel
Rom 9-11 (esp. 11:26-29)
Luke 1:68ff; 21:24; Acts 1:6-7; 3:19-21
The Millennium:Source idea and term
Idea rooted in OT prophecies of the Kingdom
Name based on Revelation 20
Key distinctive is sequence, not length
Issues:
Fulfilled in history or spiritually?
Does Christ return prior to fulfillment?
End of history cataclysmic or gradual?
Who receives the promises?
Postmillennialism
A millennium, but it develops within history
Gradual growth of church’s influence
May include the conversion of the Jews
Return of Christ follows the millennium
Postmillennialism: Supported
Historical: esp. 18th and 19th centuries
Puritans, Edwards, Finney, Hodge, Strong
Indications of social, scientific, & other progress
Contemporary aggressive advocates: theonomists
Hermeneutical: fulfillment of prophecies in history or the church
Biblical: transformation of world
Ps 2:1-12; Is 45:22-23; Dan 2:44; Zech 9:10
Parables of mustard seed & yeast (Mt 13:31-33)
Postmillennialism: Response
Can it maintain focus on Christ?
NT looks forward to 2nd coming, return of Christ
Present age:
Suffering, persecution (Matt 5:10-12; 2 Cor 1:3-11)
Evil (Gal 1:4)
Historical problem: evidence of progress?
Tends to have sporadic plausibility
Amillennialism
No thousand years or earthly kingdom
Christ rules in the church, spiritually
We await the resurrection & final states
Amillennialism: History
Origen & Alexandrians
Rejected material; allegorical exegesis
Augustine: came to reject physical millennium
Calvin: no eschatology; amill w/ post-mill motifs
Hoekema
One olive tree (no separate future for Israel)
OT “millennial” texts really speak of new earth
No future return of Israel to inherit the land
Amillennialism:Supported
Historical: Mainstream view for 1,000 years
Origen, Augustine, Calvin, Luther, RCC
Hermeneutical: spiritual fulfillment of OT prophecies in the church
Covenant theology; replacement of Israel
Non-futurist interpretation of Revelation
Simplicity: not a complex system
Philosophical (some): anti-materialism
Amillennialism: Biblical Support
Parallel of good & evil in this age
Parable of the weeds (Matt 13:24-30)
Nature of the first resurrection (Rev 20:5)
Takes place at conversion: Jn 5:24-25
Problem of evil in the Millennial state
Amillennialism: Response
Assumes either/or for interpretive schemes; OT promise
Some applied to church vs. all applied only to church
Romans 11 and national salvation
Examples of “between” or split events
2 Advents
Davidic kingship gap
Premillennialism
Prior to the millennium
Antichrist—Persecution—Battle
After Millennium
Satan deceives the nations—defeated
Premillennialism: Supported
Historical: Most clearly attested among fathers
Purpose of Millennium:
Fulfillment of promises to national Israel
To demonstrate God’s victory & fullness of salvation (esp., corporate) in history
To demonstrate human sinfulness in ensuing rebellion
Premillennialism: Biblical Arguments - Revelation 19-20
Rev 20 in most natural sense
Are the passages sequential?
Logic of passage, structural markers
Is Revelation 20 a recapitulation of an earlier passage? - Compare 12:7-11
Is the first resurrection the same type of resurrection as the second resurrection?
1st & 2nd imply coordinate
2nd death is not same as 1st death (20:14)
Are 2 resurrections different groups?
Premillennialism: Other Biblical Arguments(1 Corinthians 15:20-26)
Sequence of resurrections (23a - tagma):
Christ the firstfruits (23b)
Then at his coming, those who are his (23c)
Then comes the end (24) when he…
Issue – is there a gap between 23c and 24, as there is between 23b and 23c?
Not a certainty, but..
Other passages with the same grammatical structure (eita) do seem to have a gap
1 Cor 15:5, 7; 1 Tim 2:13; 3:10
Pretribulational
Church escapes(rapture)
Arguments for Pre-Trib (cont.)
Removal of restrainer: 2 Thess 2:6-10
Absence of church from Tribulation passages
Jer 30:4-11
Matt 24:15-31
Rev 4-19 (cp. Rev 4:1?)
Distinctive purposes for Israel and the Church
Jer 30:7; Dan 9:27
Necessary intervening events
Judgment, Marriage supper, conversions
Arguments for a Pre-Trib View
Two-fold description of 2nd Coming
Imminent: Mark 13:32; Tit 2:13; 1 Thess 4:13-18
After certain events: Mt 24-25
Promise of divine protection from wrath
Protection promised: Rev 3:10; 1 Thess 5:9
Tribulation a period of divine wrath
Rev 6:16-17; 11:18; 12:12; 14:10, 19; 15:1, 7; 16:1, 19; 19:15
Midtribulational View
General agreement w/ pre-trib on escape from wrath
Locate wrath in last half of 70th week
Softening of imminence (some signs)
Rapture not secret, but public (trumpet, shout, etc.)
Rapture takes place at “last trumpet”
1 Cor 15: 51-52
Connect w/ 7th trumpet judgment in Revelation 11:15
But: “last trumpet” could be a stock idiom
Posttribulational Options
Classic/Semi-classic posttribulationism
No future tribulation/limited focus
Futurist postribulationism
Future tribulation (70th week)
Dispensational posttribulationism
Church and Israel have distinct trib experiences
Posttribulational Support
Historical support
Seems most consistent with early premills
Distinctive pretrib view arose w/ disp. in 1800s
However, futurism also became prominent at that time!
Clarification of “imminence”
Means general nearness, not absolute
Early church did not have imminence
Posttribulational Support (cont)
Problem of terminology
Same terms used for both pretrib (rapture) and 2nd Advent
Believers in tribulation experience thlipsis (persecution) not wrath; preserved through tribulation
Unity of Church and Israel (covenant theology)
Matthew 24-25 (esp. 24:31)
Revelation
date: 68 or 69 AD
Fourth Last things
death,judgement, heaven and hell
main interpretive methods
Preterist-revelation has already been fulfilled in the past(history of church)
Historical- revelation is in process of being fulfilled
Idealist- not actual events
Futurist- chapter 4 till end of revelation yet to be fulfilled