Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
51 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
define epidemiology
|
the field of study of the distribution of a disease or a physiological condition in human pops and of the factors that influence this distribution.
epi = upon demos = people |
|
list 3 objectives of epidemiology
|
1. identify etiology & relevant risk factors (goal: Decrease M&M)
2. Develop rational basis for prevention programs 3. determine extent of disease in a community 4. study natural history and prognosis of disease 5. evaluate existing & newly developed preventative & therapeutic measures & modes of healthcare delivery 6. Provide foundation for developing public policy |
|
3 types of prevention and their def
|
primary prevention - preventing a disease in persons who are well and do not have the disease
secondary prevention - identifying people in whom disease has begun but have not yet developed clinical symptoms (preclinical phase of illness) tertiary prevention - preventing complications in the clinical phase of illness. |
|
describe John Snow and the cholera epidemic
|
John Snow - father of epidemiology (physician/statistician/sociologist). Mapping of cholera cases in East London during cholera epidemic of 1854. Traced source to a single well on broad st. that had been contaminated by sewage. 10-20,000 people died per month.
|
|
what is a confidence interval?
|
CI is the range in which the TRUE treatment effect is likely to lie.
for a 95% confidence interval, if an experiment is run 100 times, the results will likely fall in the interval about 95 times. - not always symmetrical |
|
if CI is narrow, what does this tell us?
If CI is wide, what does this tell us? |
Narrow CI - likely a large and powerful study.
Wide CI - likely a small and less powerful study. |
|
P value
|
calculated to assess whether trial results are likely to have occurred simply through chance.
|
|
why are CIs preferable to p values?
|
P values simply show a cut-off beyond which we assert values are "statistically significant".
CIs give more information - range of possible effect sizes. |
|
type I error
|
assuming that there is an effect when there is not.
5% chance of type 1 error for p =0.05 and 95% CI |
|
type II error
|
assuming there is no effect when there is in fact an effect.
|
|
when is an OR or RR not statistically significant?
|
an OR or RR is not significant if the CI includes 1.
or if the CI for mean difference includes 0. |
|
basic triad of descriptive epidemiology
|
1. time
2. person 3. place |
|
basic triad of analytic epidemiology
|
agent host environment
vector |
|
direct vs. indirect transmission
|
direct: person to person
indirect: via contaminated air/water/vector |
|
3 characteristics of host that affect disease transmission
|
genetic endowment
immunologic state age personal bx |
|
3 characteristics of agents that affect disease transmission
|
nutrients
poisons, allergens radiation physical trauma microbes physiological experiences |
|
3 characteristics of environment that affect disease transmission
|
crowding
atmosphere modes of communication |
|
subclinical disease
|
disease that is not destined to become clinically apparent
|
|
preclinical disease
|
disease that is destined to progress to clinical disease but has not yet manifested clinical signs and symptoms.
|
|
latent disease
|
existing infection with no active multiplication of the agent. only the genetic message is present in the host, not the viable organism.
|
|
carrier status
|
a person who harbors the organism but is not infected (as measured by serological studies - no antibody response); can still infect others but infectivity is often less serious than with other infections. Can be temporary or chronic (e.g., typhoid mary)
|
|
endemic
|
habitual presence of a disease within a given geographical area. may also refer to the usual occurrence of disease in that area.
|
|
epidemic
|
similar illnesses in a community or region clearly in excess of normal expectancy and derived from a common source.
|
|
2 determinants of disease outbreak
|
1. balance between # immune and # susceptible and at risk.
2. incubation period |
|
attack rate (actually a proportion)
|
# of people at risk in whom a certain illness develops
___________________________________________________________ total # people at risk (time period is usually implicit given incubation period) |
|
common diseases with short incubation periods
|
common cold - 1-3 days
norovirus 1-2 days cholera 0.5 - 4.5 days influenza 1-3 days |
|
common diseases with long incubation periods
|
chicken pox 14-16 days
5th disease 13-18 days (erythema infectiosum) HIV 2-3 months or longer mono 28-42 days (infectious mononucleosis) |
|
if we suspect a disease is occurring at a greater than endemic rate we ask:
|
Who is being affected (demographics)
Where did the cases arise? When did the disease occur? |
|
steps in investigating an acute outbreak (table 2-4)
|
1. define the outbreak and validate the existence of an outbreak
a. define numerator cases - clincial features - disease known? serologic or cultural aspects? causes understood? b. define denominator c. determine whether the observed # cases clearly exceeds expected d. calculate attack rate 2. examine distribution of cases by time and place, looking for interactions 3. Look for combination/interaction of relevant variables 4. Develop a hypothesis based on existing knowledge of disease, analogy to diseases of known etiology, findings from investigation 5. test hypotheses 6. recommend control measures (current outbreak/prevention of future outbreaks) 7. prepare written report of investigation and findings 8. communicate findings to those involved in policy development and implementation and to the public. |
|
what are some sources of data about cases of disease?
|
1. disease reporting (communicable disease registries, cancer registries)
2. insurance companies 3. public assistance and medical care plans 4. hospitals and clinics 5. pre-employment and periodic physical exams in industry and schools 6. absenteeism records 7. case-finding programs 8. military records 9. morbidity surveys on population samples |
|
5 approaches to describing prognosis
|
1. case-fatality rate (CFR): denominator = deaths/ all sick cases
2. 5 year survival rate 3. observed survival rate 4. median survival time: length of time that 1/2 the population survives 5. relative survival time: ratio of survival time in sick / expected survival if disease absent. |
|
what is prognosis?
|
describing the progress or outcome of the disease
(from time of diagnosis) |
|
prognosis: possible endpoints of disease
|
death
cure control remission recurrence |
|
what is the observed survival rate?
|
observed survival rate is an estimate of the probability of surviving
|
|
what is the five year survival rate?
|
the proportion of those with disease still alive 5 years after diagnosis / all those diagnosed with disease 5 years ago (alive and dead)
|
|
cumulative incidence rate
|
# new cases of disease/ pop at risk at beginning of interval.
|
|
what sorts of diseases are appropriate for description with CFR?
|
cases that are short-term and acute, severe.
|
|
incidence density
|
most accurate
# new cases of disease / accurate population at risk throughout interval. denominator is person-days or person-months, etc. takes into account those who will not get disease twice, those who withdraw from pop, etc. more accurate denominator |
|
relationship between incidence and prevalence
|
P = I X D
prevalence = incidence X duration |
|
point prevalence
|
(most common)
proportion of ind.s who have disease at given point in time |
|
period prevalence
|
proportion of ind.s in spec. pop at risk who have the disease over a specified period of time.
(e.g., annual prevalence, lifetime prevalence) |
|
when does it make sense to consider incidence vs. prevalence?
|
incidence rates are used to study a disease in question as it manifests in a pop. (etiology)
prevalence rates are used to measure societal burden (allocation of resources). |
|
3 sources of error in interview data
|
-has disease and is unaware (so sxs)
-has disease and sxs, no med treatment and doesn't know name -diagnosis not conveyed to person or person misunderstood -memory problems -involved in litigation about illness and alters response or chooses not to respond. -coding or surveyor error -biased interviewer -selection bias (design) |
|
all-cause (crude) mortality rate
|
all causes of death in a year/ population in that year
|
|
cause-specific mortality rate (proportion)
|
# deaths from specific cause in year / population (midpoint, because it fluctuates)
|
|
case fatality rate (CFR)
|
deaths from a specific disease / cases of specific disease
|
|
proportionate mortality rate
|
# deaths from specific cause / # deaths (all-cause)
|
|
explain YPLL
|
YPLL - years of potential life lost due to a disease.
calculated by determining the average life expectancy in pop and subtracting the age at death for an individual. adding all such individuals for a given year gives the total YPLL for a disease. 3 functions: 1. resource and research priorities 2. temporal trends in premature death 3. evaluating effectiveness of interventions |
|
when would you use direct age-adjustment? how?
|
you would use direct age-adjustment when comparing populations that are different in their age distribution, making the overall mortality rates misleading in comparison.
you take the (existing) mortality rates for each specific age group and apply them to a standard population (age-distributed), then recalculate the mortality rate and compare. |
|
when would you use indirect age-adjustment (standardized mortality ratios)? how?
|
used when total # deaths for age-specific stratum are not available.
estimate the age-specific population (using a known sample) for each age stratum. use the cause-specific mortality rate for this age distribution in the general population. calculate the expected # dead in each stratum given the gen. risk and est. pop. we can then calc. the standardized mortality ratio: observed # deaths (actual in sample) ___________________________________________ X 100 expected # deaths an SMR of 100 would mean no increased risk. |
|
describe the kaplan-meir method
|
uses the exact point in time when death occurred rather than prefixed intervals.
at participant death, new row is started graphically, this can be seen as percent surviving on the y axis and time on the x axis with blocks as the body of the graph rather than a smooth line. |