• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
No Child Left Behind - AYP
1) SINI
2)school choice.. transportation to go to adequate school
3)provide free tutoring from private providers for low SES students
4)new curriculum or new staff
5) reconstitution - fire all staff
Race to Top 4 areas
-development of rigorous standards
- data systems for parents to see progress
- support school leaders, rewarding and retaining good leaders
- increase emphasis and resources for interventions to turn around low schools
Plessy v. Ferguson 1896
Separate but equal
- allowed to have segregated schools as long as quality of schools was equal
Sweatt v. Painter
McLaurin vs Oklahoma 1950
higher education classes for black students to become lawyer, doctor, college
- these students need to be accepted
Brown v. Board of Education - 1954
4 states and D of C.
14th amendment - equal protection clause = all treated equal under laws
states violated the constitution!
separate is inherently unequal
and is damaging morally, socially, and educationally
overturned Plessy v. Ferguson
desegregate with deliberate speed
Civil Rights Act - 1964
ended discrimination and segregation in schools
Elementary and Secondary Education Act - 1965
NCLB is reauthorization
emphasizes equal access to education and establishes high standards and accountability
-fair and equal opportunity (KIND OF)
Swann v Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education - 1970
Can use buses to remedy school segregation
-use for integration
Millikin v Bradley - 1974
-segregation was allowed if it was not considered an explicit policy of the school district
- not responsible for desegregation across district lines unless it could be shown that they had deliberately engaged in a policy of segregation
- didnt have to bus like Swann v Charlotte Mecklenburg unless laws say that desegregation is impossible
Parents Involved in Community Schools v Seattle -2007
schools with overenrollment can't use racial tiebreaker (not fair to whites)
schools now use neighborhood tiebreaker
- even more segregated