Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
26 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Property Valuation
|
1. Liability Approach
2. Specialized Knowledge 3. Insurance 4. Original Amount Paid |
|
Moral Hazard
|
If you shift the individual risk away then the individual no longer has an incentive to personally take actions to minimize that risk
|
|
Risk aversion
|
When you would prefer a certain outcome that produces slightly less utility than the expected outcome. Rationally giving up expected value for certain value
|
|
Liability Approach
|
Someone may destroy the initial entitlement if he is willing to pay an objectively determined amount for it
Permission/consent is not required |
|
Property Approach
|
The government will enforce a property right by deterring an indivdiual from committing a property violation.
Someone who wishes to buy an entitlement must use a market approach |
|
Coase Theorem
|
If you assign property rights over a contested resource where there are 0 transaction costs, the efficient outcome will be reached (property rights assigned to the highest value user)
|
|
Non-excludable
|
Everyone can use it and you cant exclude people from getting the benefits
|
|
Rent-seeking
|
Expenditure of resources with no or very little increase in value. Ex. Lobbying/pickpocketing
|
|
Bounded rationality
|
Individual Makes the rational choice given the presence of uncertainty, transaction costs etc
|
|
Tort
|
Unconsentual injury/harm done to physical body/property/reputation
|
|
Objective of the liability approach in tort law
|
Consider all of the costs associated with torts and balance that with the cost of preventing the tort
|
|
Social Cost of an accident
|
Prob of a loss x Loss + cost of precautions
|
|
How to neumerically determine the optimal amount of care
|
Calculate the social cost and find the level of care that minimizes the social cost
|
|
Strict liability
|
The injurer will be liable regardless of the amount of care that they take
|
|
Negligence
|
Allows the injurer to take up to the cost justified level of care. If they take the cost justifeid level of care or more they are not liable
|
|
Can first possession be an efficient means of allocating property rights?
|
Yes- if the perosn who possesses the property is the highest value user or there are very low/no transaction costs that would prevent the first possessor from selling the property to the highest value user. However it is not efficient if there is rent seeking associated with first possession
|
|
Is the right to smoke an injunctive right?
|
No, the right to smoke is an absolute right. However, in some cases people might have an injunctive right to PREVENT people from smoking
|
|
Is rent seeking efficient
|
Rent seeking is not efficient because it involves the expenditure of resources to create a transfer of value
|
|
Real externalities
|
When there exists a cost to a third party that is not accounted for in the transaction taking place
|
|
Pecuniary Externalities
|
Any external cost to a third party is offset by a benefit to someone else that is either greater than or equal to the external cost
|
|
Eminant Domain
|
The state can force someone to sell their property
|
|
Why do we need compensation for eminant domain
|
Liability approach= make sure that the government gets the best value for their use. Can choose either fertile or unfertile land.
|
|
Just Compensation
|
Reflects "fair market value": vlaue to owner may be higher than the fair market value
|
|
Liability approach for acquisition of property
|
When transaction costs are high you do not want to deter defensive necessity. Not possible to contract or determine a market value ahead of time
|
|
Adverse possession
|
Can stake a claim on property that has been abandoned by owner
|
|
What are the unique elements of intellectual property?
|
1. Unique cost structure (rivalry problem)
2. No physical control over how property is used 3. Wide societal benefits |