• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/19

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

19 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Easement

A right to use someone else's land


Ex: Right of way


->If have exclusive possession NOT an easement

Postitive Easement

Allows the benefited landowner to use the burdened land in so way

Negative Easement

Gives the benefited landowner a right that prevents the burdened landowner from using their own lad

Phipps v Pears

Cannot create new negative easements as its not fair to restrict land

Pitfall

Easement: Right to do something


Covenant: Right to prevent someone to do something on their own land

Gribsy v Melville

Cellerroom under floor, not an easement as had the exclusive right, if the landowner is prevented from using their land all together an easement will not be granted

Parking a car-Issues

It will be an easement when it does not interfer with the reasonable enjoyment of the landowners


(London estate): Easement provided that the vehicle was not is the same spot if same space overtime would NOT be an easement

Essential Characterisitics:

Ellensborough Park


1. Must be a D+S tenement


2. Sperate ownership or occupation


3. Accommodate the D tenement


4. The right must be capable of forming the subject matter of a grant

1. Must be a D+S tenement

Dominant: The land with the benefit


Servant: The land with the burden


Ex: Right of way: Use path (D) and land that has path running through (S)

2. Separate ownership or occupation

You cannot have a right over your own land


The D+S must be different people


If the same get quasi easement

3. Accommodating the D tenement

-The right must be for a genuine use and enjoyment of land and not a personal benefit


(Hill v Tupper)-personal so not an easement


-Lands must be sufficiently geographically close


(Pugh v Savage)-not immediately adjacent-close

Moody v Steggles

A right to hang sign was held as an easement so can have easements for businesses

4. The right must be capable of forming the subject matter of a grant

-The right must be capable of being created by a deed


-Sufficiently certain, in writing, enforced and transmitted to a 3rd party on sale of land

The personal granting the easement has legal capacity

The person owns the land so can grant a benefit or burden, check title deeds or register

The right must be sufficiently definite

Relates to the use and benefit of a specific piece of land


(Alders Case): Receive light was allowed but not right to a view as its subjective and too vague

No postive obligation

An easement cannot have a positive obligation which results in the expenditure of money


(Rance v Elvin)

Category of easements are not closed

(Nigeria v John Holt): only persuasive/not binding but a similar easement can be recognized

Must relate to a specific piece of land

The easement must be attached to the land and not the person

Creation of a lease

1. Statute


2. Express Grant or Reservation


3. Implied grant or reservation


4. Prescription