• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/43

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

43 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
nature
our biological endowment; the GENES we receive from our parents
nurture
the ENVIRONMENTS, both physical and social, that influence our development
continuous development
the idea that changes with age occur GRADUALLY, in small increments.
e.g. pine tree growing taller and taller
discontinuous development
the idea that changes with age include OCCASIONAL LARGE SHIFTS
e.g. caterpillar - cocoon - butterfly
stage theories
development involves a series of DISCONTINUOUS, age-related phases
variation
DIFFERENCES in thought and behavior within and among individuals
selection
the most frequent SURVIVAL and reproduction of organisms that are well ADAPTED to their environment
sociocultural context
the physical, social, cultural, economic, and historical circumstances that make up any child's environment
socioeconomic status
a measure of SOCIAL class based on INCOME and EDUCATION
hypothesis
educated guesses
reliability
the degree to which independent measurements of a given behavior are CONSISTENT.

- interrater reliability, test-retest reliability
interrater reliability
the amount of AGREEMENT in the observations of different RATERS who witness the same behavior

cf. test-retest reliability
test-retest reliability
the degree of SIMILARITY of a child's performance on TWO or MORE occasions

cf. interrater reliability
validity
the degree to which a test measures what is INTENDED to measure.

- internal/external validity
internal validity
the degree to which EFFECTS observed within experiments can be attributed to the variables that the researcher INTENTIONALLY manipulated

cf. external validity
external validity
the degree to which results can be GENERALIZED beyond the particulars of the research

cf. internal validity
structured interview
a research procedure in which ALL participants are asked to answer the SAME QUESTIONS

cf. clinical interview
clinical interview
a procedure in which questions are ADJUSTED in accord with the answers the interviewee provides
- IN-DEPTH info about specific interviewee

cf. structured interview
interview
++: 1. reveal children's SUBJECTIVE experience
2. inexpensive, quick, in-depth data
3. FLEXIBILITY for following unexpected comments

- -: 1. BIASED
2. INACCURATE, INCOMPLETE
3. PREDICTIONS of future often INACCURATE
naturalistic observation
study children's behavior in their EVERYDAY SETTINGS

++: 1. useful for describing behavior in USUAL setting
2. illuminate SOCIAL INTERACTION processes.

- -: 1. diff. to know WHICH ASPECTS of situation are most INFLUENTIAL.
2. LIMITED value for studying INFREQUENT behaviors.
structured observation
- each child is presented an IDENTICAL LAB SITUATION.

++: 1. can observe children's behavior in the SAME CONTEXT
2. allows CONTROLLED COMPARISON of children's behavior in different situations
(<--> naturalistic observation)

- -: 1. context is LESS NATURAL
2. reveals LESS about in-depth SUBJECTIVE experience (<--> interviews)
variables
attributes that VARY across individuals and situations
e.g. age, gender, and expectations
correlational designs
studies intended to indicate how VARIABLES are RELATED to each other
correlation
the association between two variables
-
correlation coefficient
a statistic that indicates the direction and strength of a correlation
1.0 (strong positive) to -1.0 (strong negative)
direction-of-causation problem
the concept that a correlation between two variables does NOT indicate which, if either, variable is the CAUSE of the other
third-variable problem
the concept that a correlation between two variables may stem from both being influenced by some THIRD VARIABLE.
experimental designs
- random assignment, experimental control

++: 1. allow CAUSAL inferences
2. naturalistic experiments can demonstrate cause-effect connections in NATURAL setting.

- -: 1. experimental control often leads to ARTIFICIAL situations.
2. CANNOT be used to study many differences of variables (age, sex, temperament..)

c.f. correlational design
independent variable
the experience that children in the EXPERIMENTAL group receive, NOT in the CONTROL group
dependent variable
a behavior that is measured to determine whether it is AFFECTED by exposure to the INDEPENDENT VARIABLE.
naturalistic experiments
a type of experimental design in which data are collected in EVERYDAY SETTINGS.
cross-sectional design
- children of DIFFERENT AGES are studied at a SINGLE TIME.

++: 1. useful data about differences among age groups
2. quick and easy to administer

- -: 1. uninformative about STABILITY of INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES over time.
2. uninformative about similarities and differences in individual's PATTERNS OF CHANGE.

cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic
longitudinal design
- children are examined REPEATEDLY over a PROLONGED period of time.

++: 1. indicates STABILITY of INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES over long periods.
2. reveals individual's PATTERNS OF CHANGE.

- -: 1. difficult to keep all participants in study.
2. repeated testing can threaten EXTERNAL VALIDITY.

cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic
microgenetic design
- children are observed INTENSELY over a SHORT TIME while a change is occurring.

++: 1. reveal PROCESS OF CHANGE
2. reveals individual CHANGE PATTERNS over short periods in detail.

- -: uninformative about patterns of change and individual change patterns over LONG PERIODS.

cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic
direction-of-causation problem
the concept that a correlation between two variables does NOT indicate which, if either, variable is the CAUSE of the other
third-variable problem
the concept that a correlation between two variables may stem from both being influenced by some THIRD VARIABLE.
experimental designs
- random assignment, experimental control

++: 1. allow CAUSAL inferences
2. naturalistic experiments can demonstrate cause-effect connections in NATURAL setting.

- -: 1. experimental control often leads to ARTIFICIAL situations.
2. CANNOT be used to study many differences of variables (age, sex, temperament..)

c.f. correlational design
independent variable
the experience that children in the EXPERIMENTAL group receive, NOT in the CONTROL group
dependent variable
a behavior that is measured to determine whether it is AFFECTED by exposure to the INDEPENDENT VARIABLE.
naturalistic experiments
a type of experimental design in which data are collected in EVERYDAY SETTINGS.
cross-sectional design
- children of DIFFERENT AGES are studied at a SINGLE TIME.

++: 1. useful data about differences among age groups
2. quick and easy to administer

- -: 1. uninformative about STABILITY of INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES over time.
2. uninformative about similarities and differences in individual's PATTERNS OF CHANGE.

cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic
longitudinal design
- children are examined REPEATEDLY over a PROLONGED period of time.

++: 1. indicates STABILITY of INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES over long periods.
2. reveals individual's PATTERNS OF CHANGE.

- -: 1. difficult to keep all participants in study.
2. repeated testing can threaten EXTERNAL VALIDITY.

cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic
microgenetic design
- children are observed INTENSELY over a SHORT TIME while a change is occurring.

++: 1. reveal PROCESS OF CHANGE
2. reveals individual CHANGE PATTERNS over short periods in detail.

- -: uninformative about patterns of change and individual change patterns over LONG PERIODS.

cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic