Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
43 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
nature
|
our biological endowment; the GENES we receive from our parents
|
|
nurture
|
the ENVIRONMENTS, both physical and social, that influence our development
|
|
continuous development
|
the idea that changes with age occur GRADUALLY, in small increments.
e.g. pine tree growing taller and taller |
|
discontinuous development
|
the idea that changes with age include OCCASIONAL LARGE SHIFTS
e.g. caterpillar - cocoon - butterfly |
|
stage theories
|
development involves a series of DISCONTINUOUS, age-related phases
|
|
variation
|
DIFFERENCES in thought and behavior within and among individuals
|
|
selection
|
the most frequent SURVIVAL and reproduction of organisms that are well ADAPTED to their environment
|
|
sociocultural context
|
the physical, social, cultural, economic, and historical circumstances that make up any child's environment
|
|
socioeconomic status
|
a measure of SOCIAL class based on INCOME and EDUCATION
|
|
hypothesis
|
educated guesses
|
|
reliability
|
the degree to which independent measurements of a given behavior are CONSISTENT.
- interrater reliability, test-retest reliability |
|
interrater reliability
|
the amount of AGREEMENT in the observations of different RATERS who witness the same behavior
cf. test-retest reliability |
|
test-retest reliability
|
the degree of SIMILARITY of a child's performance on TWO or MORE occasions
cf. interrater reliability |
|
validity
|
the degree to which a test measures what is INTENDED to measure.
- internal/external validity |
|
internal validity
|
the degree to which EFFECTS observed within experiments can be attributed to the variables that the researcher INTENTIONALLY manipulated
cf. external validity |
|
external validity
|
the degree to which results can be GENERALIZED beyond the particulars of the research
cf. internal validity |
|
structured interview
|
a research procedure in which ALL participants are asked to answer the SAME QUESTIONS
cf. clinical interview |
|
clinical interview
|
a procedure in which questions are ADJUSTED in accord with the answers the interviewee provides
- IN-DEPTH info about specific interviewee cf. structured interview |
|
interview
|
++: 1. reveal children's SUBJECTIVE experience
2. inexpensive, quick, in-depth data 3. FLEXIBILITY for following unexpected comments - -: 1. BIASED 2. INACCURATE, INCOMPLETE 3. PREDICTIONS of future often INACCURATE |
|
naturalistic observation
|
study children's behavior in their EVERYDAY SETTINGS
++: 1. useful for describing behavior in USUAL setting 2. illuminate SOCIAL INTERACTION processes. - -: 1. diff. to know WHICH ASPECTS of situation are most INFLUENTIAL. 2. LIMITED value for studying INFREQUENT behaviors. |
|
structured observation
|
- each child is presented an IDENTICAL LAB SITUATION.
++: 1. can observe children's behavior in the SAME CONTEXT 2. allows CONTROLLED COMPARISON of children's behavior in different situations (<--> naturalistic observation) - -: 1. context is LESS NATURAL 2. reveals LESS about in-depth SUBJECTIVE experience (<--> interviews) |
|
variables
|
attributes that VARY across individuals and situations
e.g. age, gender, and expectations |
|
correlational designs
|
studies intended to indicate how VARIABLES are RELATED to each other
|
|
correlation
|
the association between two variables
- |
|
correlation coefficient
|
a statistic that indicates the direction and strength of a correlation
1.0 (strong positive) to -1.0 (strong negative) |
|
direction-of-causation problem
|
the concept that a correlation between two variables does NOT indicate which, if either, variable is the CAUSE of the other
|
|
third-variable problem
|
the concept that a correlation between two variables may stem from both being influenced by some THIRD VARIABLE.
|
|
experimental designs
|
- random assignment, experimental control
++: 1. allow CAUSAL inferences 2. naturalistic experiments can demonstrate cause-effect connections in NATURAL setting. - -: 1. experimental control often leads to ARTIFICIAL situations. 2. CANNOT be used to study many differences of variables (age, sex, temperament..) c.f. correlational design |
|
independent variable
|
the experience that children in the EXPERIMENTAL group receive, NOT in the CONTROL group
|
|
dependent variable
|
a behavior that is measured to determine whether it is AFFECTED by exposure to the INDEPENDENT VARIABLE.
|
|
naturalistic experiments
|
a type of experimental design in which data are collected in EVERYDAY SETTINGS.
|
|
cross-sectional design
|
- children of DIFFERENT AGES are studied at a SINGLE TIME.
++: 1. useful data about differences among age groups 2. quick and easy to administer - -: 1. uninformative about STABILITY of INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES over time. 2. uninformative about similarities and differences in individual's PATTERNS OF CHANGE. cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic |
|
longitudinal design
|
- children are examined REPEATEDLY over a PROLONGED period of time.
++: 1. indicates STABILITY of INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES over long periods. 2. reveals individual's PATTERNS OF CHANGE. - -: 1. difficult to keep all participants in study. 2. repeated testing can threaten EXTERNAL VALIDITY. cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic |
|
microgenetic design
|
- children are observed INTENSELY over a SHORT TIME while a change is occurring.
++: 1. reveal PROCESS OF CHANGE 2. reveals individual CHANGE PATTERNS over short periods in detail. - -: uninformative about patterns of change and individual change patterns over LONG PERIODS. cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic |
|
direction-of-causation problem
|
the concept that a correlation between two variables does NOT indicate which, if either, variable is the CAUSE of the other
|
|
third-variable problem
|
the concept that a correlation between two variables may stem from both being influenced by some THIRD VARIABLE.
|
|
experimental designs
|
- random assignment, experimental control
++: 1. allow CAUSAL inferences 2. naturalistic experiments can demonstrate cause-effect connections in NATURAL setting. - -: 1. experimental control often leads to ARTIFICIAL situations. 2. CANNOT be used to study many differences of variables (age, sex, temperament..) c.f. correlational design |
|
independent variable
|
the experience that children in the EXPERIMENTAL group receive, NOT in the CONTROL group
|
|
dependent variable
|
a behavior that is measured to determine whether it is AFFECTED by exposure to the INDEPENDENT VARIABLE.
|
|
naturalistic experiments
|
a type of experimental design in which data are collected in EVERYDAY SETTINGS.
|
|
cross-sectional design
|
- children of DIFFERENT AGES are studied at a SINGLE TIME.
++: 1. useful data about differences among age groups 2. quick and easy to administer - -: 1. uninformative about STABILITY of INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES over time. 2. uninformative about similarities and differences in individual's PATTERNS OF CHANGE. cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic |
|
longitudinal design
|
- children are examined REPEATEDLY over a PROLONGED period of time.
++: 1. indicates STABILITY of INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES over long periods. 2. reveals individual's PATTERNS OF CHANGE. - -: 1. difficult to keep all participants in study. 2. repeated testing can threaten EXTERNAL VALIDITY. cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic |
|
microgenetic design
|
- children are observed INTENSELY over a SHORT TIME while a change is occurring.
++: 1. reveal PROCESS OF CHANGE 2. reveals individual CHANGE PATTERNS over short periods in detail. - -: uninformative about patterns of change and individual change patterns over LONG PERIODS. cross-sectional / longitudinal / microgenetic |