Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
5 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Exclusionary Rule Defined
|
Unconstitutionally obtained evidence is inadmissible at trial & all Fruits of a Poisonous Tree (evidence obtained from unconstitutional police conduct) must be excluded.
-->Prohibits introduction of evidence OBTAINED IN VIOLATION OF D'S - FOURTH (unreasonable searches & seizures (arrests)), - FIFTH (Miranda, self-incrimination), - & SIXTH (right of assistance of counsel) RIGHTS in order to deter unlawful police conduct. |
|
EXCEPTIONS to Exclusionary Rule: (5)
|
1) Statements & physical evidence obtained in VIOLATION OF MIRANDA;
2) Evidence obtained from an INDEPENDENT SOURCE from original illegality; 3) INEVITABLE DISCOVERY; 4) INTERVENING ACT OF FREE WILL BY D; 5) VIOLATION OF THE KNOCK & ANNOUNCE RULE. |
|
Limitations on the Exclusionary Rule:
|
INAPPLICABLE to:
- Parole hearings; - Grand juries; - Civil proceedings, violations of state law, internal agency rules |
|
Use of Excluded Evidence for IMPEACHMENT Purposes - may still be used at trial
|
Some illegally obtained evidence may still be used to impeach D's credibility if he takes the stand at trial:
- Otherwise VOLUNTARY CONFESSION taken in violation of Miranda - admissible to impeach D. - Evidence obtained from an illegal search may be used by prosecution to impeach D's, but not other's, statements. |
|
Exclusionary Rule does not apply to: Good Faith reliance on law, defective search warrant, or clerical error.
- Good Faith exemption: |
- When police act in GF reliance on search warrant that lacks PC -- but exclusionary rule DOES apply if: underlying affidavit so lacks PC that it can't be reasonably relied upon; or the warrant is defective on its face, or the police lied to magistrate.
|