• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/6

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

6 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Co-Ds Confessions
under the 6th amendment, a defendant in a criminal prosecution ahs the right to confront adverse witnesses at trial.

if two persons are tried together and one has given a confession that implicates the other, the right of confrontation generally prohibits the use of that statement b/c the other D cannot compel the confessing co-D to take the stand for cross.

A co-D's confession is inadmissible when it *interlocks* with the D's own confession, which is admitted.

If the man refused to take the stand and subject himself to cross, his confession was not properly admitted b/c it violated the woman's Conf. clause rights.
Attempted murder, attempted manslaughter
To be liable for either – D must have acted with the intent to kill and have committed an act beyond mere preparation for the offense.
Exceptions to Exclusionary Rule that exclude evidence obtained in violation of 4, 5, 6th amendment rights and all fruits of poisonous tree.
- Fruits obtained in violation of Miranda
- Independent source
- Intervening act of free will by defendant
- Inevitable discovery
- Violations of knock and announce rule
- Live witness testimony
- Live in-court identification on ground of fruit of unlawful detention
Limitations to Exclusionary Rule
- N/A to grand jury and civil proceedings
- Police good faith reliance on law, defective search warrant, or clerical error
- Excluded evidence for impeachment purposes
D’s Right to waive counsel and represent himself
- As long as the waiver is knowing and intelligent, and the D must be found competent to proceed pro se.
- Denial of D’s right to represent himself *does constitute reversible error*, regardless of the competence of appointed counsel
Defense
- A private person has the right to use *deadly force* to effectuate an arrest when the felon appears to post a threat to the person or to others and deadly force is necessary to preven his escape, as long as the felon was actually guilty of the felony.
- Similarly, a person has the right to use deadly force in preventing the completion of a crime being committed if the crime is a ‘dangerous felony' involving risk to human life