Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
18 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
1954
|
Brown vs Board of Education Topeka Kansas
Established right of all children to an equal opportunity for an education |
|
1967
|
Hobson vs Hansen
Segregation due to IQ tests declared unconstitutional because it discriminated against African-Americans and poor children |
|
1970
|
Diana vs State Board of Ed
Court ruled children cannot be placed in special ed on the basis of culturally biased tests (Spanish student in CA) |
|
1972 Mills vs Board of Ed of D.C.
|
Court ruled that financial problems could not determine amount of (special) education the child could receive
|
|
1972 Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) vs the Commonwealth of PA
|
Right to free public education for all children with MR
|
|
1972 Wyatt vs Stickney (Alabama)
|
Individuals in state institutions have the right to appropriate treatment within those institutions
|
|
1979 Larry P vs Riles (CA)
|
IQ test could not be used as the sole basis for placing children in special ed classes (IQ tests failed to recognize AA cultural backgrounds)
|
|
1979 Armstrong vs Kline (PA)
|
Established the right of some children with severe disabilities to an extension of the 180 day school year
|
|
1982
|
Board of Ed of the Hendrick Hudson Central SD vs Rowley (NY)
First case based on Public Law 94-142, or IDEA to reach the US Supreme Court. It upheld right to IEP or right to a personalized program of instruction and necessary supportive services |
|
1983
|
Abrahamson vs Hershman (MA)
Ruled that school district must pay for placement in a private school for a child with multiple disabilities who needed around the clock training |
|
1984 Dept of Ed vs Katherine D. (Hawaii)
|
Court ruled that homebound students with multiple health impairments must be incorporated in a class with children w/o disbalities and provided with medical services
|
|
1984 Irving Independent School District vs Tatro (TX)
|
The court ruled that catheritization was necessary for a child with physical disbalities to remain in school and that it could be performed by a non-physician thus obligating the school to pay for it
|
|
1984 Smith vs Robinson (RI)
|
Court ordered the state to pay for the placement of a child with severe disablities in a residential program, ordered the school district to reinburse parents' attorney fees
The court lated ruled that IDEA, PL 94-142, did not entitle parents to recover fees, but later Congress passed an "Attorney's Fees" leading to enactment of P.L. 99-372 (handicapped childrens protection act) |
|
1985
|
Cleburne vs Cleburne Living Center (TX)Communities cannot use discriminitory zoning ordinances to prevent establishment of group homes with persons with MR
|
|
1988
|
Honig vs Doe (CA)
A child cannot be excluded from school due to any misbehavior that is disablity related (Agressive behavior bc of emotional handicaps) |
|
1989
|
Timothy W vs Rochester School District (NH)
Literal interpretation of free, appropriate public ed made school unobligated to educate severely handicapped thirteen year old b/c he could not benefit from special ed. Later overturned in appeals court. |
|
1999
|
Cedar Rapids vs Garret F.
Extended 1984 Tatro case-school district must pay for one-on-one nursing care as long as services do not require a licensed physician |
|
2005
|
Schaffer vs Weast
IDEA forces parents, not schools, to prove that their children are receiving FAPE (free appropriate public education) |