• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/30

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

30 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Unilateral renovascular disease
The kidney that is affected by the stenosis experiences reduced renal perfusion which activates its renin angiotensin system.

This leads to an increased production in angiotensin II and aldosterone leading to an angiotensin II dependent hypertension.

The contralateral kidney experiences increased perfusion which leads to suppression of its own renin angiotensin system and increased sodium excretion (a so called pressure natriuresis) which results from the hyperfiltration resulting from the higher blood pressure being driven by the opposite kidney.

When blockade of the renin angiotensin system occurs through the use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers there is a reduced arterial pressure and the glomerular filtration rate in the kidney affected by the stenosis may fall.

The use of these agents also will lead to enhanced lateralization on various functional diagnostic tests and we will touch on this more later as well. It is important to note that lateralization on functional tests occurs in unilateral disease but not bilateral disease.
Bilateral renovascular disease
When both kidneys are affected each kidney sees reduced renal perfusion.
It is important to note that stenosis of a solitary kidney is effectively the same as bilateral stenosis as the entire renal mass is affected.

With the entire renal mass seeing hypoperfusion the renin angiotensin system is activated, but in this situation there is no remaining normal kidney that can hyperfiltrate and excrete the excess sodium.

This leads to impaired sodium and water excretion which leads to a significant volume expansion which separates bilateral renal artery stenosis from unilateral stenosis.

This volume expansion coupled with the angiotensin II mediated effects leads to severe hypertension.

With blockage of the renin angiotensin system in these patients you will see reduced arterial pressure only after the patient has some volume depletion usually through the effects of diuretics.

Renin angiotensin system blockade may also lead to precipitous decreases in GFR and acute renal failure in these patients.

It is important to note that functional tests in these patients will not lateralize as the entire renal mass is affected.
Angiotensin receptors
AT1R
Widely distributed
-kidney, vascular wall, adrenals, heart brain, lung, liver
-G-protein coupled
-Multiple regulators
--ATII
--LDL
--Insulin
--Estrogen
--Progesterone
--Interferon-γ
Effects
-Vasoconstriction
-Pro-inflammatory
-Volume expansion
-Sodium retention

AT2R
Antagonizes effects associated with AT1R binding
Primarily expressed in fetal tissues
-Developmental functions
Role in adult pathophysiology unclear
RAS clinical manifestations
Asymptomatic
Secondary hypertension
Impaired renal function
Hypertensive emergency
-target organ damage
Acute postoperative hypertension
Ventricular remodeling/diastolic dysfunction
Fibromuscular dysplasia
Aortic stenosis and aneurysms
Beads on a string

Best treatment is angioplasty with or without stenting
Natural history of RAS
Relatively low rates of progression
Prophylactic renal intervention
Unassociated with clinical sequelae

Presumes
-Lesion will progress
-Disease progression causes loss of renal function that cannot be fully retrieved
-Natural history of post-intervention renal artery superior to medical management
Management of RAS
Controversial

Surgery
-angioplasty and stenting superior to angioplasty alone

Medical therapy
-adequate for majority of patients
-should be implemented prior to any consideration of procedural intervention
-goals of smoking cessation, bp control, cv risk reduction
-ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor antagonits, statins, antiplatelet
ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor antagonists and RAS
Mainstay of therapy
Improved survival
Cardiovascular event reduction
Renoprotective effects
-Diabetes
Acute deterioration in renal function after initiation is rare
Statins and RAS
Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis
-72% reduction in risk of anatomic progression
-65% reduction in risk of restenosis after endovascular treatment
Antiplatelet medications and RAS
Reduced adverse cardiovascular events
Freedom from coronary stent thrombosis
Reduction in procedure-related atheroembolism during renal angioplasty/stenting
Endovascular management of RAS and clinical response
Renal function
-improvement is rare
-post-intervention decline is serious
Hypertension
-cure is rare
-most patients improve
Restenosis follwing renal angioplasty/stenting
17-44% incidence (!)
Reported predictors:
-Renal artery diameter
-Stent diameter
-Weight/body mass index
-Smoking
-Statin Use
-Preoperative blood pressure
Surgical management of RAS
Bypass
Thromboendarterectomy

High perioperative mortality and morbidity (3-8%, 7-30%)
Surgical management of RAS and clinical response
Renal function
- 26-58% early improvement
- 3-27% worsen
HTN
-highly variable
-most patients categorized as improved
Mesenteric ischemia pathophysiology
Mesenteric smooth muscle tone
-Dynamic
-Autoregulated extensively
--10% of cardiac output at rest
--35% of cardiac output after large meal
Mesenteric ischemia=inadequate blood flow to visceral tissues
-Acute
-Chronic
--Loss of compensatory autoregulation
Acute arterial mesenteric ischemia: etiology
Embolism
-Heart
-Aortic aneurysm or atheroma
Thrombosis
-Underlying proximal atherosclerosis
Other
-Dissection
-Mesenteric aneurysm
-Vasculitis
Acute arterial mesenteric ischemia presentation and diagnosis
>60 years old
Severe abdominal pain (95%)
-“out of proportion to exam”
-Often >24h between onset and evaluation
Nausea and diarrhea (30-40%)
Hematochezia (15%)
Shock/acidosis (<10%)
Acute arterial mesenteric ischemia management
Assessment of bowel viability
-Resection of overtly necrotic bowel
-Repeat exploration
--~50% of patients undergo further resection at time of 2nd look
Revascularization
-Embolectomy
-Thrombectomy
-Bypass
-Angioplasty/stenting
-Thrombolysis (?)
Acute mesenteric ischemia: non-occlusive
Intestinal gangrene despite open arteries
-May also occur with atherosclerotic disease that is not hemodynamically significant
Contributing factors
-Vasopressors
-Cocaine
-Digitalis
Difficult to define
Limited evidence to guide management
-Antibiotics
-Catheter-directed vasodilator infusion
Most important strategy is to correct underlying cause
-Abdominal compartment syndrome
-Congestive heart failure
-Sepsis
Mortality predictors
-Atrial fibrillation
-Congestive heart failure
-Recent surgery
Chronic mesenteric ischemia: etiology
Atherosclerosis
-Usually affects origin of mesenteric arteries
-Symptoms usually associated with multivessel disease
Risk factors
-Hypertension
-Smoking
Chronic mesenteric ischemia: clinical presentation
40-70 years old
More often female
Abdominal pain (95%)
-Post-prandial
-10-30 minutes after eating
-Mid-abdomen
Weight loss (84%)
Food fear
Chronic mesenteric ischemia: diagnosis
Clinical history
Physical examination
Imaging
Duplex ultrasound
-Celiac velocity >200cm/sec
-SMA velocity >275cm/sec
-Reversal of hepatic or splenic flow
MRA
CTA
Arteriography
Chronic mesenteric ischemia surgical treatment
Anatomic options:
-Antegrade bypass
--supraceliac aorta
-Retrograde bypass
--Infrarenal aorta
--Iliac artery
-Transaortic endarterectomy
--Multi-vessel disease
--Extensive aortic disease

High mortality and morbidity (3-29%, 12-60%) but good 12 month patency (>90%)
Chronic mesenteric ischemia endovascular treatment
Perioperative death, complication rates comparable with open repair*
Symptomatic improvement
-Immediate: 85%
-One year: 75%
Postintervention bowel ischemia requiring resection 5%
-Almost uniformly fatal
Mesenteric venous thrombosis clinical presentation
Acute
Pain
Nausea
Vomiting
Abdominal distension
Fever
Insidious onset
Delayed presentation (5-30 days)
Slow progression of symptoms

Chronic
Incidental CT finding
Portal hypertension
Mesenteric venous thrombosis risk factors
Hypercoagulable states
Oral contraceptive use
Neoplasms
Inflammatory bowel disease
Intra-abdominal inflammation
Smoking
Alcohol abuse
Prior MVT
Portal hypertension
Prior abdominal surgery
Mesenteric venous thrombosis diagnosis
Lab testing
-unreliable for diagnosis
Radiographic
-CT imaging is test of choice
Mesenteric venous thrombisis treatment
Anticoagulation
Broad spectrum antibiotics
Surgical exploration
-Bowel gangrene
Mesenteric venous thrombisis surgical management
Findings:
-Mesenteric edema
-Cyanotic bowel
Resect overtly necrotic bowel
Liberal use of 2nd look
SMV thrombectomy?
-High failure rate
Thrombolysis