term1 Definition1term2 Definition2term3 Definition3
Please sign in to your Google account to access your documents:
Detecting lies
Very serious consequences. Punishments due to body language. Features could include more gaze adversion, less gesturing and fidgeting, pausing, more speech errors and fillers.
Individual diferences- micro expression, vocal inflection, rely on intuition. Pressure can cause liar to"crack".
Mann at al.
Field experiment in 99 P.O. asked to judge truthfulness of people in real interviews. Clips of 14 suspects and asked to idicate if lie or truth. Backed byither evidence. Asked to list cues used to detect liars. 66.2% accurate on lies. Experience correlated with accuracy. Most frequent cues mentioned gaze, movements, vagueness, contradictions, fidgeting.
Levels of accuracy excess that in other studies. Don't know if better than lay people. Can detect above level of chance, may pay attention to non-diagnostic cues. Could appear in manuals.
Interrogation Techniques
PACE- All interviews recorded (3 copies) and one unopened until trial.
Can't be interrogated through night or threatened.
Need help typing ? See our FAQ (opens in new window)
Please sign in to create this set. We'll bring you back here when you are done.
Discard Changes Sign in
Please sign in to add to folders.
Sign in
Don't have an account? Sign Up »
You have created 2 folders. Please upgrade to Cram Premium to create hundreds of folders!