• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/58

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

58 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Dicey's definition
Habits
Understandings
Practises
Unwritten
Evolutionary
May regulate conduct
Not 'in reality' laws
Flexible
Jennings definition
Define powers
Fill in gaps
Regulate authority of Crown
Underpin operation of Cabinet
Sir Kenneth Wheare definition
Meant as a binding rule
Behaviour accepted as obligatory
Flexible (1)
Adapt - 1975 EC Act
"amoeba like fashion" - Halaike Barnet
Flexible (2)
Change
Individual Ministerial Responsibility
Responsibility vs Accountability
Flexible (3)
Unwritten maxims - Jennings
Non-legal (1)
Supplement legal rules
Non-legal (2)
Descriptive not enforceable - AG v Cape
Non-legal (3)
Recognised - Liversidge v Anderson
Non-legal (4)
Courts must enforce laws not conventions - Mazimbumuto v Lardner-Burke
AG v Cape - What?
Diary of Cabinet decisions with intention to publish it
Extracts in Sunday Times
AG v Cape - Govt
Govt sought injunction -
Court should preserve confidentiality
Views of individual ministers
Advise to MPs
Appointment of senior officials
AG v Cape - Cape
Cape -
Conventions have no legal basis
Moral obligation
Respected or ignored subject to conscience
AG v Cape - Lord Widgery (1)
MPs do owe each other a legally enforceable duty of confidentiality
Duty disappears after 10 years
AG v Cape - Lord Widgery (1)
Not turning convention into law
"stretching" existing common law about confidentiality in respect of other relationships
AG v Cape - Lord Widgery (2)
Strong practice and understood
On occasion ignored
AG v Cape - Effect (1)
Breach of convention can have semi-legal consequences
AG v Cape - Effect (2)
Acceptance by court that convention may be underpinned by existing common law rules
"cloaked with a common law label"
AG v Cape - Effect (3)
Not disprove Dicey
Political consequences
Regulate conduct
Not in reality laws
Purpose
Regulate values of UK constitution
Accountability
Ministerial responsibility
Effect on degree of accountability
Impact on effectiveness of democratic system
Values (1)
Democracy / rule of law
Effected by conventions
Values (2)
Why change?
How?
Flexible
Values (3)
Developed out of desire to avoid formalities associated with changes to the law
Many powers to PM by operation of convention rather than legislation
In touch with "growth of ideas" - Jennings
Regulate Powers (1)
Between Houses - change without formality
Regulate Powers (2)
Royal assent - legal right to refuse
Regulate Powers (3)
Parliament Acts
Money Bills
Clear illustration of giving conventions legal effect
Regulate Powers (4)
Queen choose PM
But principle of convention requires that Minister should belong to Parliament
But no legal rule preventing Queen from choosing someone from outside Parliament
But convention
Re Canada - Confirmed
Canadian Supreme Court
Confirmed was convention
Established by years or practice and acknowledgement
Re Canada - Convention
British Parliament should only be sent Bills supported by a substantial number of Provinces
Re Canada - Problem
2/10 not substantial
Therefore federal government breaching convention
Because so important crystallised into law
Jennings 3 Stage Test (1)
What are the precedents?
Jennings 3 Stage Test (2)
Did the actors in the precedents believe that they were bound by a rule?
Jennings 3 Stage Test (3)
Whether there are good reasons for the law/convention?
Liversidge v Anderson (1)
Recognised conventions
Liversidge v Anderson (2)
HoL held that during national emergency
Inappropriate for court to question the reasonableness of the way the Home Secretary uses his power
Doctrine of Individual Ministerial Responsibility
Madzimbumuto v Lardner-Burke (1)
Confliction between law and convention
Court must enforce the law
Madzimbumuto v Lardner-Burke (2)
Souther Rhodesia Act 1965
Against convention that Parliament should only legislate for a Commonwealth country with consent of that country's government
CMR - what?
All MPs must accept cabinet decisions or dissent from them privately while remaining loyal to them in public or dissent publicly and resign
CMR - Aspects
Confidentiality
Unanimity
Confidence
CMR - Rationale
Government needs to maintain public and Parliamentary confidence
CMR - Confidence - Former
Government resign if it could not command majority commons support
CMR - Confidence - Now
Require government to resign only if defeated on an explicit no confidence motion
James Callaghan, 1979
CMR - Unanimity (1)
All MPs must agree with government policy in public
If not, resign
Robin Cook, Leader of the House, Iraq war
CMR - Unanimity (2)
Inflexible
Mitigated by practice of 'leaking' to the press
CMR - Unanimity (3)
Can be suspended
Referendum on EC membership, 1975
CMR - Confidentiality
Duty not to disclose information
CMR - Confidentiality - Exceptions
Papers deemed to be in public domain
If known to foreign governments
Written opinions of law officers
AG v Cape
IMR - what
Requires ministers to act responsibly and if necessary, reign for any errors or failures of their departments
IMR - academic opinion
Convention no longer exists - rarely observed in original sense
IMR - Crichel Down Affair, 1954 - What
Ministry or Agriculture civil servants acted deceitfully
Minister of Agriculture resigned
IMR - Crichel Down Affair, 1954 - when resign (1)
Explicit order made by MO
Must protect civil servant who carried it out
IMR - Crichel Down Affair, 1954 - when resign (2)
Civil servant acts in accordance with policy laid down by MP
Must protect civil servant
IMR - Crichel Down Affair, 1954 - when resign (3)
Official makes mistake or causes delay
But not on important issue of policy
IMR - Crichel Down Affair, 1954 - when resign (4)
Civil servant takes action which MP doesn't know
IMR - Personal knowledge
Now appears to be requirement for personal knowledge
NI Secretary, James Prior, 1983
IMR - Error of Policy
Very rare for MP to resign over error of policy
Estelle Morris, Education Secretary, 2002
IMR - vs...
Responsibility - personal actions
vs
Accountability - actions of departments and agencies
IMR - Personal morality
David Blunkett, Nanny's visa, Home Secretary, 2004, resign