• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/33

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

33 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)
Requirements of Judicial Review
SERF (think surf into court)
Standing, Exhaustion, Remedies, Finality
Standing
IIR
Injury, Interests Should Be Considered, Redressable Injury
Exception to exhaustion of administrative remedies
CFUN
Constitutional Issue, Futile or Inadequate Situation, Unreasonable Delays, Not Required
Judicial review of adminstrative rules
CUSA
Const. Violation, Unlawful proced., Stat. auth. exceeded, A&C
Judicial review of adminstrative orders
CUSEND
Const. Violation, Unlawful proced., Stat. auth. exceeded, Erroneous Interp/App, Not supported by subst. evidence, Disqualification improperly denied
Powers for federal government
CAMP FTC
Commerce regulation/Trade, Admiralty, Military, Postal service, Foreign affairs, Taxing & spending, Citizenship & immigration
To Determine Whether Pre/Post Deprivation Hearing Needed
Matthews v. Eldridge balancing test
Importance of individual interest + risk of erroneous deprivation versus Cost to government + administrative burden & availability of additional safeguards
Fundamental Right Test
1-VIP
1st Amendment, Voting, Interstate Travel, Privacy Rights
Privacy Rights
CAMPERM
Contraception, Abortion, Marriage, Procreation, Education, Relations, Medical Autonomy
Suspect Classes
RANG
Race, Alienage or Citizenship, National Origin, Gender/Sex
Governing Law
US Constitution, Washington Constitution, Washington APA (RCW 34.05)
Similarly situated persons not being treated similarly
Equal Protection Clause of 14th Amendment
Strict Scrutiny
Law NECESSARY for COMPELLING government interest, NARROWLY TAILORED (not overly broad, no less intrusive means). BOP on state
Intermediate Scrutiny
Quasi-Suspect: SUBSTANTIALLY RELATED to IMPORTANT purpose. State BOP.
Rational Basis
Non-suspect (age, wealth) RATIONALLY RELATED to LEGITIMATE interest. Plaintiff BOP
Individual Right Deprived (Process)
14th Amendment Due Process: Notice & Opp to be heard for life, liberty, prop interest (NOT, Matthews)
Deprivation (Affecting ALL persons, not treating similarly situated differently)
Substantive due process (14th Amendment)
If FUNDAMENTAL: strict scrutiny (1-VIP-CAMPERM); if not, rational basis.
Types of Discrimination
Facial (on face), Neutral (highly disproportionate impact + obvious/discriminatory intent)
Gender/Sex in WA
SS--only okay if based on unique phys characteristics. Diff than federal (Gunwall)
Religion: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
(1) BELIEF OR CONDUCT? Gunwall provides more protection than Federal Constitution free exercise or federal establishment clause
BELIEFS ALWAYS PROTECTED. Coercive effect? If facially neutral, RB. If not, SS. Under, WA, even incidental effect may be constitutional. Substantial burden should be justified by compelling interest & narrowly tailored.
Establishment Clause
Can't prefer one religion or religion (Lemon)
PRIMARY PURPOSE seculary, effect neutral, not excessive entanglement. WA: Public resources? If yes, applied to worship, exercise, instruction or support?
Free Speech Facial Attacks
Vague/overbroad, unfettered discretion
Content-Neutral
NARROWLY Tailored time, place, manner restrictions in public. Public forum or limited public (schools), RB, viewpoint neutral.
Content-Specific Speech
Disfavored. SS. Unprotected forms of speech.
Prior Restraints on Speech
Govt must prove. IMPORTANT interest (military). Not vague/overbroad. Unifrom app, quick judicial reeview.
State discrimination against other state residents re: state rights
Art. IV P&I
Fundamental state rights, including commercial activities. Only allowed if NR particular source of evil & no less restrictive means
Dormant Commerce Clause
Law must be non-discriminatory, not unduly burden interstate commerce
Proposed Rule
20 days written notice, published in state register, open hearing. w/I 60 days of petition to do anything to it, deny or begin RM proceedings
Application for Adjudication
Approve or deny w/I 90 days w reasoning & review avenues. Inform of mistakes.
Presiding Officers
DQ for prejudice/bias like judge. Impartial, unbiased. Officer can't investigate
Adjudication Process
Repped. 7 DAY WRITTEN NOTICE w hearing number, date, matters, auth, parties. Maybe discovery. Record, public.
Evidence in Adjudications
Relaxed, but: under oath, docs allowed, notice of spec facts, hearsay if credible, no ex parte contacts
Order Entry/Review
Findings on record. Stay for 10 days. Reconsideration in 10 days. Not prereq for jud review.