• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/19

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

19 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
key elements in Wood's definition of communication
Process (ongoing, temporal/historical, unfinalizable)
Systemic (affects interrelated parts; has “rules”)
Symbolic (works through symbols that are abstract REPRESENTATIONS)
Focus on meaning: “We do not find meaning in experience itself. Instead, we use symbols to create meaning.”
verbal and nonverbal communication (difference)
Verbal communication: “with words”
Nonverbal communication: “without words”
3 major paradigms w/in the discipline of communication
social scientific paradigm
interpretive paradigm
critical paradigm
social scientific paradigm
The social scientific communication paradigm assumes communication is a process that can be measured, predicted, and controlled through objective scientific methods
interpretive paradigm
The interpretive communication paradigm assumes that communication is a process of meaning making that cannot be understood simply through analysis of objective data
critical paradigm
The critical communication paradigm assumes that research can never be objective or “value-free” and thus that all research pursues a vision of “the best world” as the researchers understand it; our job is to critique (challenge, discuss, engage) these visions of “the best world”
imagined interactions
a
relational maintenance
a
Kenneth Burke's concept of guilt as a motivator for public discourse
a
technological rationality and critiques of technological rationality
a
everyday storytelling
personal narratives are performances crafted out of memory using tools we associate with theatre, literature, and other aesthetic forms
performativity
“how individuals and groups perform identities in everyday life and how they use rituals and other communicative practices to reflect, sustain, and sometimes alter social relations” (Wood 18); i.e., how does performance manifest social realities
ethnography
the study of a culture through immersion
3 significant areas w/in the discipline of communication
interpersonal and small groups
rhetoric and public address
performance studies
Interpersonal and small group
Interpersonal Com (esp. intimate relationships), Small Group
Intrapersonal Com, Organizational Com. Two representative concepts
IMAGINED INTERACTIONS: rehearse messages for different situations, such as a job interview or a date; can also offer catharsis or serve as compensation for lack of interpersonal communication
RELATIONAL MAINTENANCE: “how partners communicate to deal with the normal and extraordinary challenges of maintaining intimacy over time”
rhetoric and public address
Public Speeches, Political Com, Leadership, Mass Media, Computer-mediated communication, Social Movements. Two representative concepts, GUILT: Kenneth Burke’s concept of the symbolic purging of guilt via mortification, victimage, and scapegoating, CRITIQUE OF TECHNOLOGICAL RATIONALITY: Technological rationality is concerned with “getting things done” and “manufacturing product” ever more efficiently, which means eliminating true dialogue
performance studies
Performance as communication, aesthetic discourse, Film/TV/stage
Alternative performance modes
Everyday performance (gender, race, relationships). Two concepts: EVERYDAY STORYTELLING and
PERFORMATIVITY
Com theories methodology: quantitative
Social scientific—attempts to mirror methods in the “hard sciences”, Generates statistics to describe trends among groups, Descriptive methods, Experimental methods, Goal of theory: to explain and predict communication acts
Com theories methodology: qualitative
Textual analysis, Audience response, Historical research
Ideological critique, Ethnography
Goal of theory: to examine how discourse reflects, sustains, and sometimes alters social relations