Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
47 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Subject Matter Jurisdiction |
The Courts power over the subject matter of the lawsuit |
|
Federal Courts Subject Matter Jurisdiction |
Limited by Article III Properly Pleaded Federal Questions Diversity |
|
Federal Questions |
All civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States
Most of the time the subject matter deals with a federal law |
|
Well-Pleaded Complaint |
Federal Question must be Integral to the plaintiff's cause of action
Revealed by plaintiff's properly pleaded complaint
Anticipating a defense based on a federal statute is not sufficient
Stating a federal question which is not integral to the claim will not suffice |
|
Diversity of Citizenship |
Plaintiff must show Amount in Controversy and Complete Diversity |
|
Diversity |
Actions between citizens of different states
Actions between citizens of a state and citizens or subjects of a foreign state |
|
Complete Diversity Required |
No Plaintiff is a citizen of the same state as any defendant |
|
Diversity is Determined |
At the commencement of the Action
Where were parties domiciled |
|
Domicile |
True, fixed permanent home Must have presence and intent to remain Change in Residence doesn't necessarily change domicile One Domicile per person |
|
Intent to remain |
Subjective intent All relevant information will be considered bu the court |
|
Corporations and Domicile |
Corporation is a citizen of the state where it is incorporated and the state where it has its principal place of business |
|
Principal place of business |
Place of the Corporation's Nerve Center From where its officers conduct the corporation's important business |
|
Unincorporated associations |
All the members must be considered for diversity Very difficult to sue or be sued under diversity jurisdiction |
|
Limited Liability Company |
Citizen of all states that its members are citizens of |
|
Decedents, Minors & Incompetents |
Citizenship of the represented party governs jurisdiction not the domicile of the representative |
|
Class Actions |
Citizenship of the named members of the class |
|
Non-resident US Citizen |
Neither a citizen of any state nor an alien |
|
Permanent Resident Aliens |
Citizen of the state where they are Domiciled |
|
Alien Diversity |
Court has diversity jurisdiction over an action between a citizen of a state and an alien but not between two aliens |
|
Amount in Controversy |
Greater than $75,000 Good Faith Proof not necessary only that there is some possibility
Eventual recovery amount is irrelevant
Court Costs and interest are not included |
|
Dismissal for amount less than $75,000 |
Must be legal certainty difficult standard to meet |
|
Aggregation |
Adding claims together to satisfy amount in controversy
Must be single defendant
Exception - Joint and Severally Liable Defendants |
|
Value of equitable relief |
Value of harm to the plaintiff or Cost of compliance for the Defendant |
|
Federal Courts will not hear |
Divorce Alimony Child Custody Probate of Estate |
|
Additional claims |
Must independently satisfy federal subject matter jurisdiction or Be heard under Suplimental Jurisdiction |
|
Supplemental Jurisdiction |
Allows Federal court to hear claims (not cases) over which it does not have an independent basis for subject matter Jurisdiction
Gets Non-Federal and Non-diversity claims into federal court |
|
Test for Supplimental Jurisdiction |
Common Nucleus of Operative Fact with Claim that satisfies Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Is always satisfied if the additional claims arise out of the same transaction or occurrence
|
|
Types of Subject Matter Jurisdiction |
Pendant Ancillary |
|
Pendant Jurisdiction |
Jurisdictionally Proper claim and tacks on another claim that does not have an independent basis for jurisdiction |
|
One Limitation on the use of supplemental jurisdiction to overcome the requirements of federal court subject matter jurisdiction |
May not be used to overcome lack of diversity In a diversity case where additional claim would destroy complete diversity |
|
Ancillary Jurisdiction |
Related Claims asserted by Defendants or other additional parties which do not have independent basis for jurisdiction
Has no limitations |
|
Court Discretion |
Federal Court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction when
Complex Claim of State Law State Law Predominates Original Claim Dismissed Other Compelling Reasons or Exceptional Circumstances
|
|
Removal |
Cases that were originally filed in state court may be removed to federal court by the Defendant only if the case could have originally been filed in federal court
Allows defendant to veto plaintiff's choice of forum |
|
General Test for Removal |
If Case has Federal Question or Diversity |
|
Multiple Defendants and Removal |
Requires Unanimous Consent |
|
Waiver of Removal right |
Defendant files PERMISSIVE counterclaims in state court waives removal right |
|
Vertical Removal |
Case may only be removed to the federal district court that geographically embraces the state court |
|
Diversity Exception to Removal |
May not be removed if any Defendant is a resident of the state in which the action is brought |
|
Time limitation on Removal |
Notice of removal must be filed within 30 days after Defendant receives Notice
Exception - In a diversity case, One year after the claim is filed |
|
Dropping non-diverse defendant |
Keeps case in state court Include a non-diverse defendant Drop non-diverse defendant after one year |
|
Procedure for removals |
Defendant is required to file a notice of removal stating grounds
Signed under Rule 11
All Documents served on the defendant must be Attached
Copy all adverse parties and File Copy of Notice in State Court |
|
Remand |
Motion for Remand Within 30 days of filing of notice of removal For any defect other than subject matter jurisdiction
If defect is lack of subject matter jurisdiction a motion for remand has no time limitation before final judgement
Defendant may not appeal an order for remand |
|
Erie Doctrine |
Federal Court sitting in Diversity Jurisdiction MUST Apply state substantive Law |
|
Clearly Substantive Law |
Elements of Claim or Defense Statute os Limitations & Tolling of statute of Limitations Conflict or Choice of Law Rules |
|
Federal Law On Point |
Supremacy Clause If Federal law ON POINT In Direct conflict with the state law Federal Court must apply the Federal Law if valid |
|
Procedural Law applied in removal cases |
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure |
|
3 Part Balancing Test for Substantiveness |
A State Law which substantially determines the outcome of the litigation is substantive law and must be applied by the Federal Court sitting in diversity Jurisdiction
Does either the federal court or the state court system have a strong interest that its rule be applied
Likelihood of promoting forum shopping if Federal Law Applied |