• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Community Trust Bancorp. Inc.

D provided online banking service to 6 customers who moved to KY. D has no ad/employees/prop in KY.




Ct finds no purposeful availment: a website must be interactive enough to reveal tailored interactions with forum state residents.

Walden V. Fiore

D was DEA agent in Atlanta airport, and searched P's belonging because P had 97k in cash. No probable cause, so P sues in NV.




Ct finds that D did not create relationship with forum; P cannot be that link.

Harris v. Balk

H owed B 180. D owed E 344. E attaches B's debt and sues H for 180. B sues for his 180 from H. H argues claim preclusion.




Ct finds that per FFC, MD's judgment over H means H no longer owed B any money.

Shaffer v. Heitner

H (owner of Greyhound incorp'd in DE) filed lower derivative suit for failure of fiduciary duty against Greyhound. S filed order to sequester D's DE prop (shares, stocks). H and others given notice via mail and H argues no PJ.




Ct will now apply IS test to all assertions of PJ, including quasi in rem.

Burnham

P (NJ) was sued while in CA to conduct business/visit children. Served w/ wife's divorce petition.




Temporary presence and personal service are sufficient bases to exercise PJ over a non-resid

Insurance Corp of Ireland.

P sues in PA.




Ct finds that there was PJ in prior suit as D's presence implied consent (even though D made a special appearance). Was really a sanction for D refusing to comply with PJ discovery process

Ratliff v. Cooper

D manu'd drugs and reg'ly sent salesmen/conducted business/had in-state agent for service w/i forum.




DP req's stronger purposeful availment than mere compliance with state domestication statutes.

Zapata Offshore

Both parties K'd to settle claims in Eng Ct. Rig dmg'd by storm while being towed; P sues in FL.




Ct finds that the FSC provided sufficient consent for JX.