• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/50

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

50 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Charles first parliament (1625)

Issues


Finance- need £1 million to finance the war but parliament only granted 2 subsidies and T+P for a year


Foreign policy- Cadiz a disastrous anti Spanish intervention into 30 years war


Religion- parliament attacked Charles support of Arminian cleric Montagu


Buckingham- source of tension due to influence on the crown


Parliament dissolved after just 2 months

Charles second parliament (1626)

Issues


Finance- mps reluctant to grant subsidies and didn't agree with forced loan


Foreign policy- Charles blamed parliament for Cadiz as he had no funding


La rochelle- Buckingham tried to attack French but failed


Religon- asked laud to preach at opening sermon


Buckingham- tried to reinforce his position by removing anyone that was a threat and mps started impeachment against Buckingham so Charles dissolved parliament

Charles third parliament (1628-9)

Finance- agreed to grant 5 subsidies


Constitutional issue- petition of right when parliament was concerned charles couldn't be trusted to rule by unwritten constitution as his powers need to be restricted


Buckingham- in august 1628 Buckingham was assassinated but Charles blamed parliament for his negative impression


Other issues- 5 knight case due to common opposition of charles so they created the petition if right

State of relations between crown and parliament by 1629

Petition if right failed to address financial income and arminianism


Parliament questioned trusting Charles because at first he didn't respond to the petition in the proper way



3 resolutions


There were still moderates who wanted compromise


2 march 1629- radicals ruined Charles dissolving parliament until the 3 resolutions were passed


They expressed opposition to arminianism and T+P


Charles responding by dissolving parliament 2 days later


Eliot, holles and valentine were arrested for treason


For next 11 years Charles ruled without parliament

Personal rule 1629

Collapse of relationship between Charles and the political nation meant Charles ruled without parliament


His royal prerogative allowed this

Arminianism and laudianism

Arminianism had emphasis on ceremony, music and decoration which appealed to Calvinists more than Puritanism


Puritans had emphasis on long sermons and Bible


It was Charles favouring of laudianism that triggered Britain's war on religion by alienating Calvinists and antagonising puritans

Laudianism

Anti-calvinists


Not a group with set coherent beliefs


Had 2 key characteristics rejection of predestination and less emphasis on the Bible and more on ceremony


Communion table moved and railed off as an altar in the East of the church


Decoration such as stained glass windows and more music


Ministers wearing vestments and removal of pews


Changes had greatest effect on puritan churches as it they thought changes were all mirroring Catholics


For laud and Charles this gave services more conformity and order


Laud limited preaching to a Sunday to control puritans


Puritan preaching further limited an attack on the feoffees for impropriations


Reinforced power of the church over laity


Reissue of the book of sports and clergy who failed to read it would be expelled or imprisoned they did checks via visitations and ecclesiastical courts


Puritans believed Charles was being influenced by Catholics but Charles support of arminians was due to fear of puritans



Puritans opposition to personal rule

Millienarians- political crisis


Were worried about influence of arminians and Catholics



St Gregory's case 1633


Parishioners of St Gregory's church challenged the moving of the communion table to the east of the church


Caused offence due to moving of the pews


Upset to puritan sensibilities



John Williams


Bishop was imprisoned in 1637 as he published a criticism of the altar policy and criticism indicated terminology was a source of contention



Prynne, Burton and bastwick 1637


Were brought before star chamber court for criticisms of church policy and laudianism


Fined and imprisoned


Had their ears cut off


Public sympathy due to men being professionals and most people knew them due to their criticisms



John Lilburne


Helped distribute bastwick work


Driven to oppose laudianism


Found guilty of publishing unlicenced literature


Was fined and whipped in public



Great migration


Emigration to north America


Change in life due to faith


60,000 people made journey but not all religious



Imposition of laudianism in Scotland 1625-37

Scotland mostly Presbyterian


Charles and laud wanted to align laudianism with Scottish church as he aimed to achieve conformity across all kingdoms



Policies and events towards Scots


Act of vevocation


Charles exploited feudal right to take land from Scottish Kirk to support church in Scotland


But it only reunited land owners against Charles



Articles of Perth


King issued proclamation demanding to see articles of Perth


Addressed different issues



Charles visit 1633


Went to Scotland to be crowned king but didn't create positive impression


Offensive to scots and was Catholics



Announcement of new prayer book lead to rebellion in Scotland and start of British civil wars



Church laws on Scotland 1636


Based on articles of Perth


An attempt to return to Catholicism


Reforms imposed by royal prerogative


Scottish parliament to have a say in canons



1637


Introduced in Scotland


Imposed without consultation with Scottish parliament


Charles made not attempt to allow general assembly of Scottish parliament to have a say in canons Laudian prayer book 1637 Introduced in Scotland Imposed without consultation with Scottish parliament Leaned towards Catholicism and threatened religious independence Triggered conflict in St Giles cathedral and started Scottish rebellion which lead to the British civil wars


of Scottish parliament to have a say in canons Laudian prayer book 1637 Introduced in Scotland Imposed without consultation with Scottish parliament Leaned towards Catholicism and threatened religious independence Triggered conflict in St Giles cathedral and started Scottish rebellion which lead to the British civil wars


Leaned towards Catholicism and threatened religious independence


Laudian prayer book 1637 Introduced in Scotland Imposed without consultation with Scottish parliament Leaned towards Catholicism and threatened religious independence Triggered conflict in St Giles cathedral and started Scottish rebellion which lead to the British civil wars


Triggered conflict in St Giles cathedral and started Scottish rebellion which lead to the British civil wars


and started Scottish rebellion which lead to the British civil wars

How and why civil war started?

Finance


By 1629 Charles was £2 million in debt and had problems raising revenue


Saving due to:


Peace with Spain and France and withdrawal from 30 years war


Custom duties (T+P), wardship, monopolies, recusancy fines and knighthoods


By exploiting his royal prerogative he was able to raise income by £900,000 but he was still in financial trouble


Ship money

Opposition to the personal rule in Scotland

Charles had cut himself off from Scottish opinion and ignored growing discontent


1638- Scottish national covenant document which united those against Charles and these become known as the Covenanter's


Bishops war- Scottish rebellion became an armed conflict when bishops armed themselves when hey and to read new laudianism prayer book


Charles Scottish privy council forced to abandon Edinburgh



Truce of Berwick


Agreed a meeting of general assembly of the church of Scotland at Edinburgh and parliament abd disbandment of both armies


Covenanter's didn't trust Charles so didn't disband the army



Wentworth


Charles recalled Wentworth to deal with Scottish rebellion and he became Charles chief adviser


Advised Charles to call a short parliament to help destroy Scots



Reasons for Charles loss


Increase of power due to covenanter


Merchants purchased munitions from Holland- foreign countries support


Opposition to personal rule in Ireland

Ireland politically divided


Plantation policy which was when land was taken away and given to English settlers which brought over more Protestant


Protestant felt laudianism was too close to catholics and felt threatened


Rebellion strated as groups started to become alienated


It began in 1641 and ended early 1642


Irish seized opportunity to launch an attack against Protestant in Ulster


The Scottish rebellion prompted Irish to act

Opposition to personal rule in England

Reason for opposition


No parliament


Opposed ship money


Opposition to how Charles treated radicals such as Hampden


The rebellions is Scotland and Ireland


Emigration encouraged emigration and colonisation to north America to discuss situation in England



Hampden case


He refused to pay the forced loan and ship money to charles


Closely connected to chalres opponents fiennes and pym


Chalres took Hampden to court and tried to make a point that his authority should be obeyed

Short parliament (1640)

Had to recall parliament to deal with Scottish rebellion


Lasted less than a month


Mps not going to grant subsidies for bishops war


Pym realised agreement could only be made if Charles concessions could only be made to an English parliament


Chalres arrested his key opponents


He faced Scots without parliament which increase tension and lead to the civil war

Earl of Bedford (key events in the long parliament)

Had a scheme to reform crown finances to settle conflicts


Proposed taking position as lord treasurer


Chalres reluctant to settle with chalres


Bedford died of smallpox in 1641 which made further reform difficult which lead to disputes

Wentworth's impeachment and execution (key events in long parliament)

Wentworth recalled from Ireland in 1639 to aid chalres facing Scots


Parliament criticised and impeached him because he attempted to bring an Irish army to England


Decided a bill if attainder would be necessary and due to chalres fear he passed it


Was executed in 1641 which meant Charles was less inclined to negotiate with parliament

Bill of attainder 1641 (key events in long parliament)

Proceed against Wentworth


Passed due to fears of the army plot


Passed 204 vote to 59 but many didn't vote


Charles consented due to fear which heightened political tension

Army plot and protestation oath

1641 a rumour of a royalist army plot revealed to parliament


Attempt to release Wentworth and dissolve parliament


Parliament passed a bill stating that they can't be dissolves without their consent so drew up the protestation oath


Increase tension in parliament

Pym (key events in long parliament)

Was regarded leading opponent of chalres


His aim was to remove evil councillors


Wanted a political settlement


Became more radical due chalres threat

London crowd (key event long parliament)

Term given to Londoners who participated in politics and supported parliamentary causes


Root and branch petition signed by 15,000 Londoners which shows large amounts of support


Pym used London crowd to put pressure on lords to exclude bishops

Root and branch petition (key events in long parliament)

Demanded the end of bishops


Puritans behind it


Caused tensions in parliament


An exclusion bill was written and sent lords but was rejected


This lead to early formations of sides including moderates and radicals

Triennial act (long parliament)

Stated abolishment of ship money without parliament consent


Chalres had to call parliament every 3 years


Ensured there wouldn't be another period of personal rule

10 propositions (long parliament)

Confirmed radicalism of parliament


Document made clear that the king would need to make some concessions


Chalres wouldn't agree to this

Scotland and the incident

Scotland reaction as many felt that the radicals in the Covenanter's had gone to far


Earl of Montrose signed the Cumberland band stating his desire to defend the king which led to division


The incident was a royalist plot to kidnap radical Scottish Covenanter's which destoryed chalres hope of gaining further support in Scotland

Irish rebellion (long parliament)

Fear of Catholicism and invasion


Some English protestants became radicalised which led to the second army plot


Parliament divided on whether chalres could leads an art to defeat Irish

Grand remonstrance (long parliament)

List of criticisms of chalres government which clearly showed why chalres couldn't be trusted with control of the army


Passed


Debate to whether to pass it caused divisions and formation of 2 sides

Militia bill (long parliament)

Forced mps to take sides who should command the army


It proposed parliament should control the army


Questioned chalres prerogative


Pym use pressure from London crowd to pass it


In response charles was responding as defender of constitution

5 member coup (leading to civil war)

Division over grand remonstrance and militia bill


Chalres announced impeachment of key opponents


Chalres took trained army to make arrest personally but they escaped


Failure



Consequences


Pym could use this to show danger that chalres posed and he shouldn't be negotiated with


Led popular demonstrations against chalres


Physical divionn between crown and parliament


Strengthen position of parliament radicals

Exclusion bill (leading to civil war) 1642

Parliamentary radicals pushed for an exclusion bill which prevents bishops


30,000 signatures


Petition accepted due to pressure of the London crowd

Emergence of parliamentary army

Militia bill issues an ordinance in 1642 so they don't need royal consent


Passed in march


Parliament control of army


Commissions of array- to raise forces in response to militia bill

Nineteen propositions June 1642 (lead to civil war)

List of criticisms and demands


Demand: all privy councillors approved by parliament, 5 impeached mos to be pardoned and chalres had tro accept triennial act



Conditional royalist wrote the response the answer to the 19 propositions

Iconoclasm (lead to civil war)

Destruction and damaging of icons of the church


Moderates concerned with growing Presbyterianism if Scots and Pym's link to them


Pushes moderate mps to become supporter of royalist

The first civil war

22nd august 1642 chalres declared war on parliament



Scotland


Reduce of Ripon


Chalres supporters were isolated due to chalres supporters


Solemn league and covenant- a military alliance between English parliament and Covenanter's which made scot Nobel's support charles


Few royalist victories against Covenanter's


Little material gain and support for Charles so army returned to homeland


Covenanter army returned from England and crushed Montrose forces ending chalres hopes in Scotland



Ireland


Ormond signed a 1 year truce with the catholic confederation which transported irish troops to aid chalres but they had little impacts and seemed counterproductive in seeming to reinforce parliamentary propaganda


Provoked military alliance between parliament and Covenanter's through solemn league and covenant

Reasons for charles defeat in Ireland and Scotland (first civil war)

Forces outnumbered


Better organisation of parliament


Opponents religiously motivated


Better supplied


King had weak position and unable to coordinate force between kingdoms

First civil war in England 1642-6

Royalist


Prevented from taking turnham green


Few royalist victories in 1643 but aren't coordinated


Chalres indecisiveness


Earl of Newcastle didn't march his forces to support London attack which could have led to a win


Prince Rupert joined Newcastle forces at Marston moor and defeated


Royalist commanders dismissive on new model army


Chalres thought at naesby defeated which destoryed chalres military capabilities


Chalres surrendered to Scottish forces and put under guard house arrest



Parliament


Royalist victories didn't harm them


London trained band defended capital so they and control of London and it's exports and propanganda


Solemn league and covenant


Parliament victory at Martson moor


controlled by Fairfax and Cromwell


Created new model army controlled by Fairfax and CromwellCommittees of both kingdoms which maintained NMADefeated Charles


Committees of both kingdoms which maintained NMA


Defeated Charles




Advantages of parliament having London on the first civil war

Propaganda


Finance


Man power


Portn


Industry


Administration


Pym


Control of the navy which prevented chalres getting supplies

Reason for royalist defeat in first civil war

Strengths


Had support from people with military experience


Focused on strategy


Had military support from prince Rupert and Maurice



Weakness


Area poorer


Lacked legal weight


Bad administration


Chalres indiscivieness


General without military experience


Division


Lack of leadership


Chalres bad military leader


Agreement with Catholics


Reliance on foreign aid



Divisions in parliament after the first civil war

Political Presbyterian


Moderate


Holles key figures


Opposed religious toleration


Favoured peace with king and willing to make settlement on minimal terms such as disbanding NMA


Drew close to scotsb


Supported Presbyterian


Peace party



Political independents


figuresOpposed religious toleration Favoured peace with king and willing to make settlement on minimal terms such as disbanding NMA Drew close to scotsbSupported PresbyterianPeace party Political independents Cromwell and Ireton Radical Disliked PresbyterianAllied with the NMA Willing to make peace only is chalres accepted limitations to powerPresbyterians mist influential in 1646 due to peace


Cromwell and Ireton


Radical


Disliked Presbyterian


Allied with the NMA


Willing to make peace only is chalres accepted limitations to power



Presbyterians mist influential in 1646 due to peace

Newcastle propositions July 1646

Plan for settlement by political Presbyterian


Had to accept Presbyterianism for 3 years


Parliament control army for 20 years


Had to accept triennial act


Chalres response was to stall to let divisions deepen


1646-7 made a more lenient version



Political Presbyterian leader holles abused NMA in a document called the declaration of dislike which stated they were enemies to the state


Parliament owned army £3 million

Politicisation of the new model army

Commanded by Fairfax and cromwell


They had concerns over their wages of £3 million but they faced disbandment before being paid


Statements became more radical


Wanted to redress their grievances


Commons accepted chalres 3rd reply to Newcastle propositions which annoyed the army as they felt they were to lient and chalres couldn't be trusted


Commons vote to disband NMA so in response they held a meeting at Newmarket


Chalres was seized by army and under house arrest


Produced a humble remonstrance saying they won't disband till grievances are met


Formed the solemn engagement


Representation of army document outlined their position


Army generals met at reading


Created the head of proposals


Control of chalres allowed then to negotiate with him


Ireton's and cromwell willingness to compromise brought division in the army


Putney and Whitehall debates


Army marched into Westminster


Chalres escaped from Hampton court in 1647

Head of proposals

Made by Ireton


Regular biennial parliaments


Reform


Control of army and navy


Religious settlement


Act if oblivion

Fifth monarchists

More formal emergence of millienarians


Wanted religious, social and economic reform


Derives from the book of Daniel


Were supporters of cromwell


Wanted to replace parliaments with church parliament


Thomas Harrison

Diggers

Gerrard winstanely


Communes outside London St Georges hill but destoryed after a year by Fairfax


Failed


Dominated by winstanley


Radical movement had long lasting significance

Leveller's

Putney and whitehall debates


First agreement of the people


2nd agreement of the people denounced rump parliament


Pressure group


Many were arrested


Failed as they couldn't raise discontent in army and rump parliament had money to pay troops

Why was there a second civil war?

Chalres refused to negotiate


New models army reaction


Chalres wasn't trusted and clumsy alliance with scotsb


Deep divisions



Chalres refusal to negotiate due to:


Betrayal of loyal people


Responsibility

The engagment with scots 1647 (leading to 2nd civil war)

Scottish army to invade England to restore king to thrown


Presbyterianism for 3 years


Independents to be suppressed


Split Scotland


Parliament sent chalres the 4 bills but rejected them


Alliance with Scots drove the independents and Presbyterians back together


Parliament passed vote of no address which suggests no further negotiation with the king

Windsor prayer meeting

Meeting of NMA


Gathered to pray before facing their enemies


Declared chalres man of blood


It was the first time regicide was discussed


Shows growth of religious influence in the NMA

Second civil war events 1648

Rising in south Wales


Rising in Colchester


Rising in kent


Scots invade England in support of chalres


Cromwell defeats Scots at Preston

Failure of settlement 1648-9

NMA crushed royalist


Execution of the king


Newport treaty proposals to the king



Remonstrance of the army



Formally outline their position


Demanded parliament put chalres on trail




Prides purge


Prospect of treaty between king and parliament caused Ireton to actFormally outline their position Demanded parliament put chalres on trail If parliament refused they would purge parliament Prides purge Parliament voted to continue with Newport treaty Organised troops to purge parliament especially those who were agreeing to treaty Removed mps taken to pub called hellRemaining mps became known as rump parliament and they would bring chalres to trial


Parliament voted to continue with Newport treaty


Organised troops to purge parliament especially those who were agreeing to treaty


If parliament refused they would purge parliament Prides purge Parliament voted to continue with Newport treaty Organised troops to purge parliament especially those who were agreeing to treaty Removed mps taken to pub called hellRemaining mps became known as rump parliament and they would bring chalres to trial


Removed mps taken to pub called hell


Remaining mps became known as rump parliament and they would bring chalres to trial




Trail and death of chalres

Many mps refused to act


Fairfax only attended first meeting


Some saw it as last chance for settlement



Kings response


Chalres refused to accept courts legitimacy


Chalres declared guilty and sentenced to death


Only 59 mps signed death warrant


30th Jan 1649 chalres executed


He was more popular at his death than he had ever been