• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/48

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

48 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

decisions

making choices between alternatives

reasoning

the process of drawing conclusions &


the cognitive processes by which people start with information and come to conclusions that go beyond that information

deductive reasoning

Involves SYLLOGISMS


-If we know that at least a C average is required to graduate, & that Josie is graduating, then we can conclude that Josie is at least a C average


-definite conclusions

Inductive reasoning

We arrive at conclusions about what is probably true, based on evidence


-probable conclusions

Structure of a syllogism (makes up deductive reasoning)

1) statement/premise


2) statement/premise


3) conclusion

categorical syllogisms

premises & conclusion describe relation between 2 categories by using statements that begin with ALL, NO, or SOME


ex.


Premise 1: All birds are animals.


Premise 2: All animals eat food.


Conclusion: therefore, all birds eat food.

Validity

A syllogism is valid when its conclusion follows LOGICALLY from its 2 premises

Difference between validity & truth?

Validity depends on the FORM of the syllogism


Truth refers to the CONTENT of the premises

conditional syllogisms

have two premises & a conclusion, but the first premise has the form of "If...then"

antecedent & consequent

Antecedent- "If" term (p)


Consequent- "then" term (q)

Affirming the antecedent

If I study then I'll get a good grade.


I studied.


Therefore, I'll get a good grade.



VALID

Denying the consequent

If I study, then I'll get a good grade.


I did not get a good grade.


Therefore, I didn't study.



VALID

Affirming the consequent

If I study, then I'll get a good grade.


I got a good grade.



Therefore, I studied.


INVALID, maybe you didn't have to study.

Denying the antecedent

If I study then I'll do good.


I didn't study.



Therefore, I didn't get a good grade.



INVALID, maybe you did get a good grade.


Watson four-card problem

-4 cards- each with a letter on one side & a number on the other


-Task: indicate which cards you would need to turn over to test the following rule~ If there is a vowel on one side, then there is an even number on the other side.

Falsification principle

To test a rule, it is necessary to look for situations that would falsify the rule

pragmatic reasoning schema

a way of thinking about cause & effect in the world that is learned as part of experiencing everyday life

permission schema

States that if a person satisfies condition A (being legal age for drinking) then he or she gets to carry out action B (being served alcohol)

evolutionary perspective on cognition

argues that we can trace many properties of our minds to the evolutionary principles of natural selection


Adaptive characteristics will become basic characteristics of humans

social exchange theory

states that an important aspect of human behavior is the ability for two people to cooperate in a way that is beneficial to both people


-essential that people be able to detect cheating behavior so that they can avoid it

What are some factors that can contribute to the strength of an inductive argument?

1) Representativeness of observations


2) Number of observations


3) Quality of the evidence

heuristics

rules of thumb

Availability heuristic

states that events that are more easily remembered are judged as being more probable than events that are less easily remembered

illusory correlations

when a correlation between two events appears to exist, but in reality there is no correlation or it is much weaker than it is assumed to be


-occurs when we expect 2 things to be related so we fool ourselves into thinking they are related even when they are not

stereotype

an oversimplified generalization about a group or class of people that often focuses on the negative

representativeness heuristic

states that the probability that A is a member of class B can be determined by how well the properties of A resembles the properties we usually associate with class B

base rate

the relative proportion of different classes in the population


for ex. in 1972, there were more farmers than male librarians so people would say the man was a farmer



-disregarded when descriptive information is there

conjunction rule

states that the probability of a conjunction of two events (A & B) cannot be higher than the probability of the single constituents (A alone or B alone)



-Linda is a bank teller


-Linda is a bank teller & is active in the feminist movement



*the second one cannot have a higher probability than the first one


law of large numbers

states that the larger the number of individuals that are randomly drawn from a population, the more representative the resulting group will be of the entire population

confirmation bias

tendency to selectively look for information that conforms to our hypothesis and to overlook information t hat argues against it

expected utility theory

based on the assumption that people are basically rational, so if they have all the relevant information they will make a decision that results in the maximum expected utility

utility

refers to outcomes that achieve a person's goals

expected emotions

emotions that people predict they will feel for a particular outcome

immediate emotions

emotions that are experienced at the time a decision is being made


2 types:


1) integral immediate emotions


2) incidental immediate emotions

Integral immediate emotions

emotions that are associated with the act of making a decision



ex. Deal or No Deal contestant

Incidental immediate emotions

Emotions that are unrelated to the decision


-ex. someone is naturally happy

risk aversion

the tendency to avoid taking risks

Why do people overestimate what their negative feelings will be?

One reason is that when making their prediction they don't take into account the various coping mechanisms they may use to deal with adversity

opt-in procedure

signing card to be organ donor


-requires the person to take an active step

opt-out procedure

in which everyone is a potential organ donor unless he or she requests not to be

When do people use a risk aversion strategy & a risk taking strategy?

Risk aversion strategy- when a choice is framed in terms of gains



risk taking strategy- when a choice is framed in terms of losses

framing effect

decisions are influenced by how the choices are stated or framed

Effect of Damage to the Prefrontal Cortex

1)Planning & Preservation


2) Problem Solving


3) Understanding Stories


4) Reasoning

Neuroeconomics

combines research from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, & economics


-research has identified areas of the brain that are activated as people make decisions while playing economic games

ultimatum game

two players play


one is designed as the proposer & the other as responder


proposer is given a sum of money and makes offer to responder as to how this money should be split between them


if the responder accepts, money is split. if he rejects, no one gets anything.


Game is over after responder makes decision

What part of the brain responds to rejection?

right anterior insula, an area located between the parietal & temporal lobes

What goals do prefrontal cortex & anterior insula have?

Anterior insula- emotional goals


prefrontal cortex- cognitive goals

omission bias

the tendency to do nothing to avoid having to make a decision that could be interpreted as causing harm