• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/24

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

24 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

How do RR criticise other theories?

No other theories offer a practical solution to solving the issue of increasing crime rates.

How do RR criticise the labelling theory?

Too sympathetic towards the criminals.

What is the main focus of the RR?

finding practical solutions to controlling crime.

How do RR believe the issue of crime should be tackled?

Through control and punishment.

According to RR, what are the 3 factors that crime is a product of?

-Inadequate socialisation and the underclass


-Individual biological differences


-rational choice to offend

Who argued that individual biological differences was a cause of crime?

Wilson and Herrnstein.

What did Wilson and Herrnstein argue?

-Some people are more likely to commit crime because of biological differences such as personality traits.


-Low intelligence is the main cause of crime, which they argue is biologically determined.

Who do RR believe are the best agent of socialisation?

The nuclear family.

What is the underclass?

A group in society who are defined by anti-social behaviour and failure to socialise their children properly.

Why does Murray believe crime is increasing?

Because of the growth of the underclass.

Why does Murray believe there has been an increase in the size of the underclass?

-Welfare dependency


-Led to a decline in marriage, increase in lone parents and resulted in men not being employed as they do not have to support their families.

Why does Murray believe lone mothers are an ineffective agent of socialisation, especially for boys?

-Lack of an appropriate male role model.


-Lack of paternal discipline.


-Turn to crime to gain status.

Why is the underclass bad for society?

-threatens social cohesion as it undermines the values of hard work and personal responsibility.

What is Clarkes argument?

the decision to commit crime is a choice based on rational calculation of the consequences.

What is Felsons argument?

Routine Active Theory- For a crime to occur there has to be a motivated offender, a suitable target and abscence of a ‘capable guardian.’

What do RR believe are the 4 main ways to tackle crime?

1- The broken window thesis


2- Zero tolerance policies


3- Role of the police is to control the street and protect law abiding citizens.


4-Target Hardening

5 Evaluation Points of RR.

-ignores wider structural causes of crime.


-fails to explain violent crime through the rational choice theory.


-over emphasis of biological factors.


-free choice view conflicts with the view behaviour is determined by biology/socialisation.


-ignores corporate crime.

Define individualism.

Concern with the self and ones own individual rights rather than those of the group.

Who is the main sociologist associated with LR?

Young.

LR are ? Sociologists.

Reformist

What do LR believe are the 3 main causes of crime?

1- Relative Deprivation


2-Marginalisation


3-Subcultures

How has the late modern society caused crime?

-destabilised families and communities


-growing contrast between cultural inclusion and economic exclusion


- 'downwards relative deprivation'

What are the 2 ways LR think we should use to tackle crime?

1- Change the style of policing


2- Tackle the underlying causes of crimes

State 4 evaluation points of LR.

-fails to explain corporate crime which is more dangerous.


-uses quantitative data so cannot explain motives of the offenders


-over predicts the amount of crime: not everyone who experiences relative deprivation will commit crime


-unrepresentative: make crime appear a bigger problem than it is.