• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/3

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

3 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

To get this material copy and paste link to browser - http://entire-courses.com/BUS-311-Week-4-DQ-1-Intellectual-Property-Protection

This file of BUS 311 Week 4 Discussion Question 1 Intellectual Property Protection includes: Why is it important to society that the law protect intellectual property? Should an individual who is offered an employment position sign an employment contract that contains a restrictive covenant?

To get this material copy and paste link to browser - http://entire-courses.com/BUS-311-Week-4-DQ-1-Intellectual-Property-Protection

Deadline: ( ), Business - Management Read the Case Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz in the text. Answer the following questions: 1. What were the terms of the contract between Campbell and the Wentzes? 2. Did the Wentzes perform under the contract? 3. Did the court find specific performance to be an adequate legal remedy in this case? 4. Why did the court refuse to help Campbell in enforcing its legal contract? 5. How could Campbell change its contract in the future so as to avoid the unconsionability problem? Read the Ace Heating and Cooling scenario in your text and answer the following questions: a. Under UCC 2-302, who has the best chance of getting out of the contract due to unconsionability? b. The symbol for justice features a woman wearing a blindfold illustrating that the law should be applied the same way regardless of who the parties are. Does the UCC rule seem to contradict this? Which approach do you think is more ethical? c. Note that both Glamour and Shady Rest are businesses, and courts rarely find that contracts between two businesses are unconscionable. The rationale is that a business is a sophisticated entity, familiar with transactions and able to protect itself. Do you think Glamour and Shady Rest are in a comparable position in regard to this contract? Why or why not?

To get this material copy and paste link to browser - http://entire-courses.com/BUS-311-Week-4-DQ-1-Intellectual-Property-Protection

It is a smart idea to not buy your books until after the first class. You may learn that certain books you thought were needed are not necessary. This is often true for hybrid or online classes. Many times, online readings and lectures will be enough to succeed in the class.