• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/38

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

38 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
civil wrong othat than breach of contract
tort
intentional tort
did something on purpose that was a civil wrong, defendent knew what was going to happen
battery
interntional unconsented to, harmful or offensive contact
assault
puting somebody in reasonable apprehension of a harmful or offensive contact
intentional confinement of an individual
false imprisonement
extreme and outrageous conduct
intentional infliction of emotional distress
putting somebodys reputation down, falsely, has to be published
defamation
putting somebodys reupation down, spoken
slander
defmation that puts in writing, or on the news (widely spread)
libel
defenses for defmation
truth
absolute privilege
conditional
constitutional
using somebodys name or likeness without permission
appropriation
example: guy puts camera where girl showers without permission
intrusion
example: boyfriend puts private nude pictures of girl on internet
publishing true, but private facts
example: boyfriend writes on nude internet picture "wants to have sex"
putting a person in a false light in public eye
use the legal process for purpoose unattended
abuse legal process
you allow something (not you) to go on somebody else's land
trespass to land
example: play loud music so people aren't able to enjoy their land
nuisance
a very serious trespass to personal property
conversion
the defamation of a product or a serice
disparagement
with disparagement you have to prove how much you've been damaged
elements of negligence
duty- there was a duty of care owed to plaintiff
breach- the duty of care was breached
causation-breach was actual cause of injury
in emergency situation
person can't be held accountable of somebody who gets hurt more
"good samaritan act"
if child is seen walking to busy street
babysitter has ____ duty
random person has ____ duty
legal
moral
violation of statute where there is a law trying to get people safe and somebody gets hurt anyway
negligence per se
duty of owners who own artificial condition (sylo or storage house)
risk to children is greater than benefit for landowner to keep atificial condition. Than person could get into trouble
occupier of land has to put land in reasonably safe condition
example:
trench's in backyard
duties owed to licensees
since they are licensed and not trespasser, you have to fill them in on danger, if they stay anyway you are no longer liable, they assume the risk
duties owed to public invitees
have to make place safe
things that speak for themselves
ex: door to door salesmen are liscensees
res ipsa loquitur
was the breach of the duty of care the actual reason for what happened
causation
was the causation foreseeable?
legal or proximate cause
if there's a subsequent, interdependent, cause that was not foreseeable, charges will be dropped
superceding cause
if jury decided that 10 percent of case is plaintiffs fault, then they receive nothing
contributory negligence
if jury decides that 10 of case if plaintiffs fault, then plaintiff receives 90 percent, 100-10
comparative negligence
if you are more than 50 percent liable for cause then you receive nothing on settlement
mixed contributory and comparative negligence
if you do abnormally dangerous things or buy dangerous product than you are ______
liable
if person injured is negligent, than their defense would be ______
comparative negligence
difference between tort and crime
TORT
plaintiffs pay court fees
money damages go to plaintiff
preponderance of evidence
difference between tort and crime
CRIME
govt. pays court fees
money damages go to govt.
have to prove beyond reasonable doubt defendant is guilty of crime