Assessment Test Two

Front 1

WHAT ARE THE CONTROVERSIES OF INTELLIGENCE THEORIES?

Back 1

1. NATURE VS NURTURE
2. FIXED OR CHANGEABLE
3. RACE AND INTELLIGENCE
4. HISTORICAL - ONE FACTOR OR SEVERAL

Front 2

WHAT ARE THE 8 PARTS OF GARDNER'S MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES THEORY?

Back 2

1. LINGUISTIC (WORDS)
2. LOGICAL (MATH)
3. MUSICAL
4. BODILY/KINESTHTIC
5. SPATIAL (PARALLEL PARKING)
6. INTERPERSONAL (RELATIONSHIPS)
7. INTRAPERSONAL - (SELF-AWARE)
8. NATURALISTIC (NATURE)

Front 3

WHAT ARE THE 2 PARTS OF CATTELL'S INTELLIGENCE THEORY?

Back 3

1. CRYSTALLIZED - WORD FLUENCY, GENERAL INFO - MEMORIZATION
2. FLUID - SPEED OF INFO PROCESSING, ABSTRACT THINKING - APPLICATION

Front 4

WHAT ARE THE THREE PARTS OF STERNBERG'S TRIARCHIC INTELLIGENCE THEORY?

Back 4

1. COMPONENTIAL - INTERNAL, GENERAL KNOWLEDGE
2. EXPERIENTIAL - EXPERIENCES OF THE INDIVIDUAL - CREATIVE FACTOR
3. CONTEXTUAL - EXTERNAL WORLD, HOW YOU FUNCTION IN THE OUTSIDE WORLD

Front 5

WHAT IS THE TWO FACTOR INTELLIGENCE THEORY?

Back 5

1. G FACTOR - GENERAL KNOWLEDGE
2. S FACTOR - SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE

Front 6

HOW DO YOU POSITIVELY INFLUENCE INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT?

Back 6

1. PROVIDE DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE PLAY AND LEARNING MATERIALS
2. ENCOURAGE EXPLORATION AND STIMULATE CURIOSITY
3. CREATE A WARM RESPONSIVE SUPPORTIVE ENVIRONMENT
4. NOTE THAT NUTRITION, POVERTY, HEALTH HAVE NEGATIE IMPACT

Front 7

HOW DOES IQ CHANGE?

Back 7

1. INFANCY - EARLY CHILDHOOD - CHANGES FREQUENTLY
2. MIDDLE CHILDHOOD - SCORES BEGIN TO STABILIZE
3. 7 YEARS OLD - SCORES ARE FAIRLY GOOD PREDICTORS OF ADULT IQ

Front 8

WHAT IS THE DISTRIBUTION OF IQ SCORES?

Back 8

1. NORMAL DISTRIBUTION WITH MAJORITY OF PEOPLE BEING AVERAGE AND ABOUT 2% SUPERIOR AND 2% MENTALLY RETARDED
2. 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS ABOVE OR BELOW

Front 9

MILDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS HAVE AN IQ OF?

Back 9

50-55 TO 70

Front 10

MODERATELY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS HAVE AN IQ OF?

Back 10

35-40 TO 50-55

Front 11

SEVERE RETARDATION OCCURS IN INDIVIDUALS WITH IQ SCORES THAT RANGE FROM?

Back 11

20-25 TO 35-40

Front 12

PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS HAVE IQ'S THAT ARE?

Back 12

BELOW 20-25

Front 13

WHAT ARE THE FOUR SUBSETS THAT COMBINE FOR A COMPOSITE SCORE ON THE STANFORD-BINET INTELLIGENCE TEST?

Back 13

1. VERBAL REASONING
2. QUANTATIVE REASONING
3. SHORT-TERM MEMORY
4. ABSTRACT VISUAL REASONING

Front 14

WHAT IS THE TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY FOR THE STANFORD BINET INTELLIGENCE TEST AND WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?

Back 14

.95 - STRONG CORRELATION- MEANS THAT IF YOU GIVE THE TEST AGAIN, RESULTS WILL LIKELY BE THE SAME EACH TIME

Front 15

THE WAIS III IS A SERIES OF 13 TESTS WITH SCORES BROKEN DOWN INTO 3 CATEGORIES - WHICH ARE

Back 15

1. VERBAL IQ
2. PERFORMANCE IQ
3. FULL SCALE IQ
COMPARE THE THREE TO FIND STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES

Front 16

THE WISC-IV IS A SERIES OF 15 SUBTESTS WITH 4 INDEX SCORES GIVEN TO WHOM?

Back 16

CHILDREN AGES 6-16

Front 17

THE WPPSI-III STANDS FOR_____ AND IS GIVEN TO WHOM?

Back 17

WESCHSLER PRESCHOOL AND PRIMARY SCALE OF INTELLIGENCE AND IS GIVEN TO CHILDREN 4-6 1/2 YEARS OLD

Front 18

WHAT ARE THE PROS AND CONS OF INTELLIGENCE TESTING?

Back 18

1. HIGHLY TRAINED EXAMINER
2. COST
3. TIME

Front 19

WHAT DO COUNSELORS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TESTING?

Back 19

1. REFERRALS FOR TESTING
2. INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
3. COMMUNICATION OF RESULTS TO CLIENTS
4. MINORITIES DO NOT GENERALLY PERFORM WELL ON STANDARDIZED TESTS
5. OVERALL SCORE IS WHAT IS IMPORTANT
6. ORIGINAL TEST NORMS WERE MIDDLE CLASS WHITE PEOPLE

Front 20

WHAT IS THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP?

Back 20

A DISPARITY OF SCORES THAT HAS LED TO THE OVERREPRESENTATION OF MINORITY CHILDREN IN SPECIAL EDUCATION CLASSES

Front 21

IQ TEST SCORES HAVE DECREASED BY ABOUT 3 POINTS OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS DUE TO WHAT?

Back 21

THE FLYNN EFFECT

Front 22

A TEST THAT GIVES THE SAME, CONSISTENT RESULTS THAT ARE DEPENDABLE AND REPETITIVE AND ACCURATELY MEASURES WHAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO EACH TIME IS SAID TO BE?

Back 22

RELIABLE

Front 23

WHAT ARE RELIABILITY COEFFICIENTS?

Back 23

THE DEGREE TO WHICH THE RESULTS WILL BE REPEATED ON RETESTING
.00 = LACK OF RELIABILITY
1.00 = PERFECT RELIABILITY

Front 24

WHAT ARE THE FOUR METHODS FOR TESTING RELIABILITY?

Back 24

1. TEST-RETEST - GIVE SAME TEST OVER AND CORRELATE SCORES - COEFFICEIENT OF STABILITY
2. ALTERNATE FORMS - ADMINISTER 2 DIFFERENT FORMS OF TEST AND CORRELATE SCORES TO GET ESTIMATE OF RELIABILITY
- COEFFICIENT OF EQUIVALENCE AND STABILITY
3. SPLIT-HALF RELIABILITY - ADMINISTER ONE TEST AND DIVIDE INTO TWO COMPARABLE HALVES - COEFFICIENT OF EQUIVALENCE AND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY
4. KUDER-RICHARDSON - COMPUTE THE RELIABILITY OF TEST ITEMS TO EACH OTHER AND THE TOTAL TEST - COEFFICIENT OF INTERNAL CONSISTENCY

Front 25

WHAT IS INTER-RATER RELIABILITY?

Back 25

MEASURES HOMOGENITY - USED TO ASSESS THE DEGREE TO WHICH DIFFERENT RATERS/OBSERVERS GIVE CONSISTENT SCORES ON SAME RATING INSTRUMENT

Front 26

WHAT DOES VALIDITY MEASURE?

Back 26

TRUTHFULNESS AND ACCURACY
THE EXTENT TO WHICH A TEST MEASURES WHAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO MEASURE

Front 27

WHAT ARE THE FOUR TYPES OF VALIDITY?

Back 27

1. CONTENT
2. FACE
3. CRITERION-REFERENCED
4. CONSTRUCT

Front 28

WHAT ARE THE TWO TYPES OF CRITERION-REFERENCED VALIDITY?

Back 28

1. CONCURRENT - HOW DOES IT RELATE TO HOW THEY'RE DOING RIGHT NOW
2. PREDICTIVE - WHAT DOES IT TELL YOU ABOUT HOW THEY WILL PERFORM IN THE FUTURE?

Front 29

WHAT IS CONVERGANT VALIDITY AND GIVE AN EXAMPLE?

Back 29

CORRELATES HIGHLY WITH OTHER MEASURES DESIGNED TO MEASURE THE SAME CONSTRUCT - EXAMPLE SOMEONE WHO IS RELIGIOUS SHOULD ALSO BE HONEST AND TRUSTWORTHY
(SIMILAR OTHER PHENONMENON)

Front 30

WHAT IS DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY AND GIVE AND EXAMPLE

Back 30

SHOULD NOT CORRELATE WITH OTHER CONSTRUCTS
EXAMPLE - MEASURING HOW FAST SOMONE CAN RUN TO DETERMINE IF THEY ARE RELIGIOUS