Ap Gov Bill Of Rights Test

Front 1

NAACP v. Alabama

Back 1

1958- state court in alabama tries to obtain membership list for NAACP. court found that your right to associate is private (with only certain exceptions)

Front 2

Roberts v. United States Jaycees

Back 2

Minnesota Jaycees began admitting women as members defying rules established by natl organization. important test of all-male bastions and the balance of desire to end discrimination and the freedom to associate. court ruled that they must allow women, expressive association, asked what is the purpose of the organization

Front 3

Dale v Boy Scouts of America

Back 3

Openly gay boy scout leader dismissed for violating policies against homosexuals and athiests as members or leaders. court ruled that it goes against the expressive purpose of "well rounded young christians"

Front 4

The four areas of the right to assemble

Back 4

1. political, 2. social, 3. economic, 4. religious

Front 5

Mapp v Ohio

Back 5

exclusionary rule: evidence can be excluded in court if taken illegally

Front 6

robinson v california

Back 6

anti-intimidation, can't beat information out of you, protects against police brutality

Front 7

gideon v wainwright

Back 7

right to council, makes public defenders

Front 8

miranda v arizona

Back 8

miranda rights read to you when you are arrested "you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can an will be used against you in a court of law"

Front 9

when is a warrant not required

Back 9

exugent circumstances

Front 10

probable cause

Back 10

reliable knowledge being or already commited

Front 11

exclusionary rule

Back 11

inadvertant discovery

Front 12

Griswold v Connecticut

Back 12

legality of birth control, creates zone of privacy-sexual freedom

Front 13

Loving v Virginia

Back 13

follow up of Gris v Connect, states marriage is a fundamental right so the state must have a compelling interest to take it away, lets misogyny or interracial marriage legal,

Front 14

Roe v Wade

Back 14

abortion never mentioned, states that you have the right to control your own body, question of viability, right to privacy

Front 15

Planned parenthood v casey

Back 15

be able to make restrictions on abortion based on community standards and undue burden. creates judicial acceptions

Front 16

sternberg v carhart

Back 16

creates medical exceptions (followed by gonzales v carhart

Front 17

gonzales v carhart

Back 17

restrictions on partial birth abortions

Front 18

bowers v hardwick

Back 18

created anti-sodomy laws(against deviant sex), overturned by lawrence and garner v texas

Front 19

lawrence and garner v texas

Back 19

overturns bowers v hardwick

Front 20

categories of freedom of speech

Back 20

political speech, artistic, commercial, entertainment, and obscenity

Front 21

schenk v United states

Back 21

charles schenk distributes pacifist literature designed to obstruct military recruitment

Front 22

Chaplinsky v New Hampshire

Back 22

chaplinsky distibuted religious materials when a riot broke out, when confronted, calls marshal offensive names, courts ruled

Front 23

cohen v california

Back 23

cohen arrested in courthouse by wearing jacket that says f--- the draft, courts ruled

Front 24

roth v united states

Back 24

roth mails obscene materials to potential customers, courts ruled

Front 25

RAV v St paul

Back 25

white teen burns homemade cross un front yard of african american family with 5 children, courst ruled

Front 26

wisconsin v mitchell

Back 26

hate crime of black man beating up white man almost to death, courts ruled

Front 27

tinker v des moines school district

Back 27

students wear black armbands to school to protest vietnam war, court ruled

Front 28

How the audience plays a role in freedom of speech

Back 28

must be captive audience, involve children or the innocent, see likely response- "imminent lawless action" (fighting words)