Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
3 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Freeman v Buckhurst Park Properties (apparent authority) |
- involved a director of a company who was not the managing director of a company BUT was the managing director to the knowledge of the contractor - HELD: - the company was bound by the agents actions due to apparent authority - APPARENT AUTHORITY = - principal makes representation that the agent has the authority to enter the principal into contracts of the kind within the scope of their apparent authority - principal is liable for any obligations |
|
|
Savill v Chase Holdings |
- agent purported to have authority from the principal that they didn't actually have - used letterhead, answered phonecalls etc - third party sued claiming the parent company was bound by the agent due to apparent authority - HELD: - were not bound - THE REPRESENTATION MUST COME FROM THE PRINCIPAL |
|
|
. |
. |
