• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/5

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

5 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Regarding different biological samples T/F
1. blood - usually only for specific drug levels
2. urine and sweat may be used for drug screening
3. hair / skin - usually only to diagnose chronic toxicity (e.g. arsenic)
4. saliva - concentrations of drugs are usually higher than in urine; may be able to estimate serum concentration if salivary concentration known
5. meconium - can detect intrauterine toxic exposure
1. T
2. T
3. T
4. F - concentrations LOWER
What are the (formal blood) drug levels that may assist risk assessment or management? Which is the only one appropriate as a screening test in unknown ingestions??
CBZ
Digoxin
Ethanol, Ethylene glycol
Iron
Lithium
Methanol, Methotrexate
Paracetamol (can be used for screening), Phenobarb
Salicylate
Theophylline
Valproate
Chemical urine spot tests - which drugs?
NB they are qualitative, provide results in <20/60, have low sens and spec.
- paracetamol
• salicylates - trinders spot test
• FPN test for phenothiazines
• opioids
• barbiturates
• benzodiazepines
• benzoylecgonine
• phencyclidine
• THC
What are the limitations of testing levels in the ED; what are the indications?
ADDITIVE VALUE OF TESTS
• 95% of ingested drugs can be suspected by hx, exam, other ix
• the frequency of useful unexpected results is only 0.9% in paediatric patients
• may assist with decision for antidotes - rarely indicated without:
- specific clinical features being present
- measurement of blood levels

LIMITATIONS OF TESTS
• does not confirm detected agent is responsible for toxicity
• results usually take too long to be useful in the ED
• expensive
• few clinical decisions made as a result
• may detect metabolites from previous non relevant ingestion e.g. THC metabolites excreted for 2 weeks, cocaine
• false negatives common following ingestions of clonazepam and lorazepam
- neither metabolised to oxazepam which most toxicology testing depends on for detection

INDICATIONS
• rarely indicated in ED
• severe toxicity and unknown ingestion
• most useful in
- patients with unexplained behavioural disorders
- new onset seizures
- covert ingestions (e.g. diuretic use in eating disorders)
Check out Dunn 1324 - lots of data on different methods of lab analysis of toxins, but I'm unsure of what value this is to our exam.
x