40 Matching Cards

Front 1

Lemon v. Kurtzman

Back 1

1971: tripartite test to assess Establishment clause: govenrmental action must: have a secular purpose, primary effect does not advance or impede religion, and avoids excessive governmental entanglement with religion

Front 2

Wisconsin v. Yoder

Back 2

Amish: after completing 8th grade, they do not need to continue education provided a vocational component is available

Front 3

Wallace v. Jaffree

Back 3

moment of silence in school
cannot add "voluntary prayer" at that time

Front 4

Lee v. Weismann

Back 4

cannot invite clergy to school event (graduations)

Front 5

Thomas v. Atascadero

Back 5

AIDS infected children are protected by federal laws barring discrimination against individuals with disabilities
doctors provide informaiton of what to do

Front 6

Minarcini v. Strongsville City School

Back 6

school board has the right to overide faculty judgements regarding the selection of books for academic courses and school library, not liable for books already present in library
there is a process for challenging materials

Front 7

Bd. of Ed. Island Frees v. Pico

Back 7

discretion of school boards to make decision that reflect community standard

Front 8

Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier

Back 8

censor student expression in school related activities: newspaper

Front 9

Virgil v. School Board of Columbia City, FL

Back 9

school boards can censor materials for instructional purposes

Front 10

Debra P. v. Turlington

Back 10

can establish minimum performance standards for degree. (i.e. have to pass test and class for graduation)

Front 11

Dawson v. East Side Union High School

Back 11

Channel 1
students have right not to be exposed to commercial expression

Front 12

Tinker v. Des Moines School

Back 12

ok to wear symbols as long as doesn't interfere with school program
silent protest, expression is okay.
can be curtailed if disrupts educational process

Front 13

Guzick v. Drebus

Back 13

right to protest can be curtailed if disruptive

Front 14

Unites States v. Morales

Back 14

general intent is all that is required to constitute a threat
INTERNET

Front 15

Roberts v. City of Boston

Back 15

1849 segregation based on race,
child walked right past school to get to her school

Front 16

Plessy v. Ferguson

Back 16

1896 uphold segregation on railroad, separate but equal

Front 17

Brown v. Bd. of Education of Topeka

Back 17

1954 racially unequal, start de-segregation

Front 18

Brown II

Back 18

1955 not seperating fast enough, do faster

Front 19

Green v. New Kent County, VA

Back 19

must eliminate racial identification by:
composition of students, faculty and staff
transportation
extracurricular activities
facilites

Front 20

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ

Back 20

related to busing
more was needed in terms of staff, student population and facilites to integrate population

Front 21

Milliken v. Bradley

Back 21

Detroit: to fully integrate, avoiding white flight and zone jumping, take students from surrounding districts

Front 22

Lau v. Nichols

Back 22

San Francisco
students failed to provide for needs of non English speaking students, lack of sufficient instruction violated Title VI

Front 23

Jacob Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act

Back 23

effort to support gifted children in elementary and secondary schools

Front 24

Vorchheimer v. School District of Philadelphia

Back 24

can operate gender segregated high schools as long as there are other non-segregated high schools in community and it is voluntary to attend

Front 25

United States v. Virginia

Back 25

VMI
no comparable facility for women therefore must:create acceptable program, integrate women or lose funding.

Front 26

Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public School

Back 26

Title IX prohibits sexual harassment and damages can be awarded. Coach inappropriate with female.

Front 27

Ordway v. Hargraves

Back 27

pregnant teens
cannot discriminate b/c of pregnancy, must receive regular education if wanted

Front 28

Burlington v. Massachusetts DOE

Back 28

school p/u bill for student's private school placement

Front 29

Goss v. Lopez

Back 29

sets up due process procedure
due process must be provided to student, including a hearing

Front 30

Paredes v. Curtis

Back 30

stigma from charges may affect reputation -- not found to be true

Front 31

Katzman v. Cumberland School District

Back 31

cannot reduce grade due to suspensions. School should have a policy regarding make-up of work

Front 32

New Jersey v. T.L.O.

Back 32

search in school requires only reasonable suspicion not probable cause

Front 33

Gregory M.

Back 33

discovery of outline of gun in bag constituted reasonable suspicion to search

Front 34

Horton v. Goose Creek School

Back 34

okay for dog to sniff objects

Front 35

Vernonia School District v. Acton

Back 35

1995 random drug tests of students in athletic programs is okay

Front 36

Wood v. Strickland

Back 36

ignorance of law does not shield administrators if it impairs students rights

Front 37

Connecticut Ed. Assoc. V. Tirozzi

Back 37

state could replace permanent teaching certificates with 5 year certificates renewable with CEU's

Front 38

Pickering v. Bd. of Ed.

Back 38

1968
teachers have 1st amendment right to air their views on matters of public concern
(teacher wrote letter and dismissed)

Front 39

Wygant v. Jackson Bd of Education

Back 39

quotas cannot be managed effectively with RIF policy

agreement to protect minority teachers from layoffs to preserve the perdcentage of minority personnel ...violated Equal Protection clause
Racial classifications justified by: compelling governmental purpose and means tailored to that purpose

Front 40

Mt. Healthy City School v. Doyle

Back 40

documentation necessity related to obscene gestures

even though teacher expression is protected, can fire if there is sufficient cause independent of speech
(teacher called radio station re grooming code, also had trouble with gestures towards girls)

Front 41

Connick v. Myers

Back 41

issues need to be of public interest not personal, consider form, context and content of expression as it relates to public matters (lawyer transferred and circulated questionnaire mostly personnel questions)

Front 42

Boring v. Buncombe Bd. of Educ

Back 42

administrators regulate the curriculum
(teacher play was inappropriate, teacher moved)

Front 43

Domico v. Rapides Parish School Board

Back 43

reasonable grooming and dress restrictions on teachers
(prohibit teachers beards to instill discipline and uniformity was minor violation)

Front 44

Gaylord v. Tacoma School district #10

Back 44

1977
upheld school board decision to dismiss teacher after admitted homosexuality to administrator, considered to impair teaching

Front 45

Griggs v. Duke Power Company

Back 45

when tests for employment are used, must be reliable and valid and qualify as business necessity.