Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
18 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Comparing to Navy performance evaluation/fitness report and counseling system
|
Reporting senior Delegated Reporting Senior Immediate Superiors in Command (ISICs) Enlisted Reporting Senior |
|
Reporting senior |
-CO’s are reporting seniors by virtue of their command authority.
-Also CO for civilian equivalent. |
|
Delegated Reporting Senior |
-Actualtotal transfer of authority. i.e.When CO is not available, XO takes charge for the signing of evals (or a seniorenlisted for junior sailors) |
|
Immediate Superiors in Command (ISICs)
|
-Reportingseniors of COs, and assume authorities when reporting senior is impaired.(Higher up than CO). |
|
Enlisted Reporting Senior |
-CPOs(E7-E9) reporting senior for E4 and below. |
|
Raters and seniorraters |
-EVALon E6 and below requires signature of a reporting senior, a rater and a seniorrater. -Ratershould be a Navy CPO. If not available, a military or civilian equivalent. -Seniorrater usually member’s division officer or department head. -Nextsenior officer in CoC having reporting authority must sign all reports. |
|
Performance counseling |
-Upto the command. -Atmid-point of the periodic report cycle. Counselor= LPO -Objectiveis to provide feedback to member, motivate and assist improvement.
|
|
Types ofreport |
Regular reports Concurrent reports Operational Commander reports |
|
Regularreports |
-Foundationof the performance record. -Theymust cover, day-for-day, all Naval service on active or in drilling Reserveprograms. |
|
Concurrentreports |
-Recordof significant performance in an additional duty (ADDU) or temporary additionalduty (TEMADD) status. -(EVAL when you’re TAD for more than 6 months .) |
|
OperationalCommander reports |
-Optional,only submitted on commanding officers or officers in charge by operationalcommanders who are not their regular reporting seniors. |
|
EVAL/FITREP
|
Administrativeblocks Guidance ontrait grade Comments block Promotionrecommendation summary groups |
|
Administrative blocks |
Theyidentify the report, define the context and make it more informative todetailers and selection boards.
|
|
Guidance on trait grade |
7trait grades. 5.0=above standards 1.0=Poor performance |
|
Comments block |
16lines max -Giveexamples of performance and results. -Basedon verifiable facts. -No underlining, boldface, italics … allowed |
|
Promotion recommendation summary groups
|
-Consistentwith the performance trait grades. 4.0 EP 3.8 MP 3.6 Promotable 3.4 Progressing 2.0Significant Problems |
|
Misconductreporting |
Do not punish someone with a bad EVAL becausethey failed PRT, or got a NJP
|
|
Responsibilitiesand rights of members |
Membershould sign all regular reports. (Acknowledging they saw it and had a copy ofit, not necessarily agreeing with it) Shallreceive a copy from the reporting senior. Right to submit a statement within 2 years thereafter. |