Words Are More Powerful Than Weapons In Julius Caesar Essay

Improved Essays
Julius Caesar Spring Final
There are several occurrences that prove the theory that words are more powerful than weapons. In the play Julius Caesar a guy by the name of Marc Antony convinces a whole crowd of people to revolt against their leader. In Germany Hitler did a similar thing, he turned the people to his radical side. They used persuasive speech and gave the people offers that caused them to be loyal to them. These two people proved that words are more powerful than weapons. Mark Antony had a tough job he had to give a speech after brutus had the crowd cheering for him. Antony starts to give his speech and he slowly starts to explain why Brutus was wrong. “But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus was an honourable man. He has brought many captives home from Rome, whose ransoms did the coffers fill. Did this in Caesar feel ambitious.” (Julius Caesar,56) In his speech he continuously said that Brutus is an honorable man. Eventually the crowd is completely against Brutus at this point he tells them caesar left them money in his will. This gets them extremely angry that Brutus killed such a nice man and they started to riot. There is no way that mark antony could take down brutus’s army with a weapon. This is why mark antony got most of the village on his side then he attack Brutus and won. This is
…show more content…
Adolf Hitler wrote a book while he was in prison. Over 5,200,000 copies of this book were sold by 1939.(Wilmoth) In this book, he described the ideal government which included the ideal person. This book caused Hitler to gain popularity, and persuaded many Germans to follow Hitler. After he gained popularity he started giving speeches eventually he became the dictator of Germany. After Hitler persuade the germans with his words he started conquering other countries and started building concentration camps. There is no wa that Hitler could have done this without his persuasive

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony, in his eulogy, presented himself as filled with grief and loss; however, a form of subliminal persuasion and manipulation is used to sway the Roman people in his favor. The loyal friend of Caesar appeared to be supportive of the conspirators, but his devotion to the true king never wavered. While he praised the conspirators for being “such honorable men”, Antony admitted how he grieved for his friend. He utilized paralipsis in his cajolery, stating that “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, / But here I am to speak what I do know.”…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.” -Mahatma Gandhi. In this quote Gandhi is pointing out that by using violence, we destroy what little bit of humanity we have left. By using our words and not violence we get our point across not only in a more respectful manner but with less destruction after all.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric, it’s all around us whether we realize it or not. In Act Three of Julius Caesar, Caesar moves to the capitol after refusing Artemidorus’ letter of warning. Shortly after, the conspirators (people who were planning to kill Caesar) stab him to death. Antony flees the scene but Brutus convinces everybody to let him live. Brutus then explains to the people of Rome the meaning of why they had killed Caesar, but what Brutus, the conspirators, and people of Rome don’t know, is that Antony is pretending to be an ally but in reality, plans on striking back with the help of Octavius Caesar.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Bernbach once said, “Persuasion is not a science but an art.” In the shakespearian play Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony Speaks to the People of Rome about Caesar’s death. Brutus makes a great speech, but Antony is the one who wins over the crowd. Let’s compare and contrast both sides of the two speeches. The strategy Logos, Ethos, Pathos, and Karos was used in both speeches and each speech used it differently.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar No matter what the circumstances, people always look for someone to blame. Caesar’s murder results in the plebeians needing to blame someone for what happened. Despite Brutus’s honor and respect among the Romans, Antony gave the more convincing speech at Caesar’s funeral by having an emotional impact on the Romans, therefore proving to them that the conspirators committed an injustice to Rome. Brutus first speaks at Caesar’s funeral with the goal of justifying his actions to the plebeians.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare was able to show how rhetorical devices are able to persuade an audience. In Shakespeare’s play, Mark Antony, who was loyal to Caesar, delivered a speech to Romans that supported Brutus after the funeral of Caesar. The speech conveyed why Caesar was a loyal Roman. By depending on expressing emotions, usage of diction, and logic of the argument, Antony persuades the Roman citizens that Caesar had more loyalty than Brutus. Throughout his speech, Antony appeals to the audience’s emotions to persuade the audience that Caesar was a virtuous leader who did not deserve a premature death.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What happens when societies experience the inevitable pain of great oppressions or trouble? Tyrants need a problem or conflict, such as terrorism or neglection, to get the attention of the public. A person will rise up to fight. That person may look like they are motivated to help fellow humans, but he or she could be an imposter pretending to want to help the people, but in reality the potential tyrant was waiting for the chance to take power. That person will offer a solution and will have a scapegoat.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s significance to the play is often remembered by his speech at Caesar’s funeral as it appealed to different means of persuasion that allowed him to connect with his audience and use the people of Rome to his advantage. His talent to use words and emotionally manipulate his audience results in the people blindly worshipping him as though he were king, thus giving him the power to control Rome. Antony’s speech is often classified as one of Shakespeare’s best rhetorical works to this day, and while it holds its own individual remembrance, it can be comparable to another such as President Barack Obama’s Inauguration speech in 2009. Apart from the differences between his speech and Antony’s, his demonstrates similar techniques of persuasion that resulted in him winning the presidential election afterwards. Mark Antony and President Obama reached individual levels of success due to similar rhetorical uses of persuasion in their speeches as both their work appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos, but differentiated certain motives and aspects that provoked the mood and naive minds of their…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    " Hitler became the leader of the Nazi party and started his dictatorship. He eventually had options for the people of Germany that determined the work they did, such as work that was given to you with no option or the camps. Hitler was known for his concentration camps and the punishment he gave to the Jews because of who they are. Though the culture of Germany changed quite drastically, Hitler banned all books that gave idea of communism or socialism. The education in that country was taken over too, Hitler focused more on the youth because they were more impressionable than the adults.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The rise of Hitler and the Nazi Party was inevitable. The rise of Hitler and the Nazi Party was practically inevitable. Germany had previously had a legacy of authoritarian rule, and the majority of German citizens wished for a strong leader to run the country, the description of which Hitler fit perfectly. Also, National Socialism appealed to a wide variety of people, making emotional promises to several key groups in society in order to gain their devotion.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He makes another choice that has a negative outcome, Brutus decides to let Antony speak at the funeral for Caesar. This turned out to be an awful decision, Antony would end up taking advantage of this opportunity to persuade the crown. Antony said in his speech to the crowd, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept; Ambition should be made of sterner stuff.” (III.ii.91-93).…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Herding sheep has been an art for thousands years and over time a person can train one of his dogs to do this. In the Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare has used this art and used the people as a herd of sheep, being swayed one side to another. The play takes place in Ancient Rome when Julius Caesar came to power by murdering one of his adversaries Pompey. During this time the people were in rejoice that Julius had killed Pompey, but some were in discouraged about the fact that people have change so easily. Further on in the play a group of conspirators who want to kill Caesar decided that even though Julius is not a tyrant now, but in time he will become a corrupt tyrant.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays