Why Is The British Parliament Weak

Great Essays
From both domestic and international perspectives, the British Parliament is widely vied as relatively weak. According to Graham Brady MP, only a third of the public think that the Parliament is effective to hold the government to account. He claims that after serving 18 years in the Commons has given him the thought that the Parliament is weak and ineffective. According to Kreppel’s statement in Typologies and Classification, many contemporary analyses maintained the classic relative opinion that ‘the U.S. Congress and the British Parliament serve as the emblematic examples of a strong and weak parliament respectively’. Richardson and Jordan’s (1979) well-known characterisation of Britain as a “post-parliamentary democracy” seemed to remain …show more content…
However, this was only until 1998, when a process of devolution started to transfer executive legislative powers to the other three nations of the United Kingdom, which are Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Devolution has been defined by The Royal Commission on the Constitution as ‘ the delegation of central government powers without the relinquishment of sovereignty’. In other words, devolution means power is given from Westminster to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, providing them greater control over their own affairs, as well as the authority to make their own laws in certain areas. Yet, this does not promise full independence as Westminster still retains power over key areas such as defence. Devolution started when the Scottish Act 1998 is introduced and created Scottish Executive and the Scottish Parliament. Additionally, the Government of the Wales Act 1998 created Welsh Assembly, which has few powers than the Scottish Parliament. Northern Ireland Assembly created by the 1998 ‘Belfast Agreement’ also known as the ‘Good Friday Agreement’. The Assembly has been suspended a number of times but came back into power in May 2007. The Scottish Executive and Scottish Parliament have been constantly called for further government and law-making powers to be transferred since the devolution in 1998. A commission …show more content…
The Scottish Act 2012 delegated more powers to the Scottish Parliament. Furthermore, this Act changes the name of Scottish Executive to Scottish Government formally. Through this Act, greater tax-raising powers were devolved; new powers to make legislature on matters relating to air weapons were delegated and Scottish Ministers were granted powers on misuse of drugs, speed limits and the administration of elections to the Scottish Parliament. After the referendum of Scottish Independence in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There are some theories that the United Kingdom being involved in the European union restricts the idea of parliament sovereignty, this being that the fact parliament is no longer the supreme law maker, as they have to involve European laws into the United Kingdom so the fact that parliament didn't make the law goes against the quote 'What the Queen in Parliament enacts is law'. The British constitution can be summed up in eight words, "what the queen in parliament enacts is law". This means that parliament using the crown, enacts law what no other body can challenge. In A.V. Dicey main theory in the law of constitution 1885 ; witch is sometimes seen as an out dated theory being one hundred and…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The United States as of the last 40 years or so has lost much trust in their government. In particular, they do not believe that congress is doing a very good job. Many believe that politicians are in the job just for the power and not to help the people like they are supposed to do. Former Massachusetts senator, Mo Cowan, argues that congress is doing a good job and is necessary in his paper “Cowan Farewell Address”.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In many countries such as Canada and the United States, the hegemony has been divided between the executive branch, the judiciary courts and the legislative branch. “Generally, the amount of power for each member of these institutions is to be uniformly divided; conversely, the fairly recent transformation has increasingly concentrated the majority of power towards the hearts of the government” ("Is the Canadian Prime Minister too Powerful?,"2010). In recent years, many political scientist have argued that the demographic changes in political systems have led the executive branches in western governments to have extensive amounts of power. In this essay, I will argue that the executive branches of western governments; particularly that of Canada’s…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this seemed like a positive of the system, it was not implemented when Britain and France divided the territories into states. In addition, the mandatory powers had complete control over the mandates. This meant that they could reorganize the territories however they saw fit. The ultimate goal of this program was to prepare the territories to become independent.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because it is not divided into two houses with different priorities (like with the House of Lords and the House of Commons), the political process can be considered less complicated and confrontational than down in Westminster. This is also claimed to be reflected in the shape of Holyrood’s chamber benches, which is that of a horse-shoe, instead of the rectangular shape of those in Westminster, where the parties directly face each other (Lockhart, 2014). It attempts to be more open and public with its political processes, a value which is reflected in its more modern, less imposing building. It has yet to accumulate the plethora of traditions and oddities that surround the Westminster-based parliament.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paper #3 – Critical Evaluation of Hudson’s Challenges to American Democracy In the textbook, American Democracy in Peril, William E. Hudson has written a well-thought out critique of the challenges faced by American democracy, but some of his methods and reasonings have issues. Hudson is looking for anything that he thinks might work in the American democracy. This paper will critically evaluate Hudson’s work and a few specific flaws in his proposals. Hudson is striving to make a difference, but he has not conscientiously considered the feasibility of his plans.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Delegated Powers Explain what delegated powers are and what role they play in Congress. Delegated powers that are not found in the Constitution. Instead, delegated powers are the result of congressional laws and resolutions that are then exercised by the executive branch. Congress cannot carry out and regulate all of the programs and statutes they pass. Instead, Congress relies on departments in the executive branch to establish new actions to execute their goals.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The weakness is Congress not having set terms. Politicians that are making this a career and are serving multiple terms is what hurting our society. We need different views and opinions how it should be running with today’s concerns. Our country will never be fixed until we set the term limits for Congress; elect new and fresh minds. This will be the only way Congress be stronger and meet…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government is a political party with the majority of MPs, this is currently the House of Commons. This is probably the biggest influence on parliament as a whole due to them being hard to control by any other house, this is due to them having the majority of power and the only way they can be made weak is if members of the Commons start turning against one-another. Most of the main bills that occur come from the government, so if the campaign did pass and get enough attention then it would go through the government but if it doesn't get through the second reading, which is a debate and a vote on whether the bill should proceed or not, then the bill would not become a law. So it is down to the government weather or not the law passes or…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lisbon Treaty

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Council has a significant change on the amendment of qualified majority voting (QMV), hence laws can be develop more easily without the unanimity consensus. Also, after abrogating the three-pillar structure of the EU, the QMV has to deal with the decisions on justice and home affairs policy. Gaining legal personality is another change after the Lisbon Treaty as EU is now able to sign up the European Convention on Human Rights. Despite the changes, the Lisbon Treaty set up a scope for the EU and members States to comply with on what they are responsible for and…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bibliography • Andersen, S. S., & Eliassen, K. A. (Eds.). (1996). The European Union: how democratic is it? London: SAGE.…

    • 2829 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Delegated legislation (also known as secondary legislation) have many benefits with regards to passing Laws. Due to the sheer volume of Laws that need passing in England, leaving The Houses of Parliament unable to meet with the demands, thus the allowance of a second party to pass an Act (through the parenting/enabling act), both the House of Commons and the House of Lords can continue with their ever-changing workload. Made up of two separate houses, The Houses of Parliament consist of; the House of Commons, and the House of Lords. 650 majoritarian elected individuals known as ‘Members of Parliament’ (or MPs for short), make up the House of Commons, and each MP represents a constituency, such as Conservative party member Karen Bradley who represents Leek.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essentially there needs to be one power in charge in order to make sure nobody is getting special treatment from Parliament.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Majoritarianism Analysis

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Majoritarianism In the Context of British Politics In a nutshell, majoritarian politics is democracy taken to a more extreme level. Majoritarian governments are designed to favor the ideas of the ruling majority, as well as pass legislation based on the views of that group. The government of the United Kingdom has historically been majoritarian; utilizing a system built on fast and simple decision-making. In accordance with its historical roots, can the same tenets of majoritarianism be observed in the modern-day government of the United Kingdom?…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of the most celebrated forms of democracy, the "Westminster model" has been a defining feature of the British political system for the past century. Coined after the location where the Houses of Parliament stand, the system is also sometimes referred to as the majoritarian model, in that majority rule is a central attribute of the model. The characterising factors of the model have been present throughout modern British political history, but more apparent in some years than others. The years 1945-1970 symbolise a strong alignment with the main features of the model, in which bare majority cabinets and the concentration of executive power in one party delineated the British political system. The 1970s on the other hand saw a deviation…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays