Why Is Malthus Wrong

Thomas Malthus is an outcome of fixed western European ethics. Malthus’s leading edge composition, an essay on the principle of population is inspired by Malthus’ views on the human nature reproduction, societal posturing, and integrity. Malthus’s progressive and visionary rationalization, abstracted him from conventional European contemplation, padded with practical predictions supported by mathematical statistics and biological understandings of human nature. His compositions have brought up many social and economical world issues that humans face today like food production, population control, extreme poverty, diseases and wars. Though Malthus’ statistics are incorrect because he could have not predicted rapid technological advancements that would enhance food production, from different stand points he is correct, when looking at undeveloped countries …show more content…
He did not take account of an industrial revolution (education and technology), with humans access to more coal meant increase in farming productivity and farming tools which lead to an increase in food production. These new farming inventions directly decreased the number of farmers (smaller families), with education and technological progress increasing, humans were consuming more energy. Inventions created more efficient outlets in farming and crop growing dominating human and animal abilities, the differences are widely significant in terms of mass production. Enhancements in transportation due to fossil fuels, meant faster and larger transportation of crops, and advances in medical agricultural shed light on pesticides and artificial nutrients, and all increased the production of food. If the industrial revolution had not taken off, with new sources of energy like fossil fuels beginning with coal, Malthus theory might have been proven correct. Therefore Malthus’ argument about population not keeping pace with food supply is not