• Home Page
  • Why God Allows Evil By Ernest Nagel And Does God Exist?

Why God Allows Evil By Ernest Nagel And Does God Exist?

Superior Essays
Show More
At a young age majority of us grew up believing that there is a higher being above us that created us, that shaped our lives to be where it is now, and that being is known as god. When we were a child, we did not have a choice whether we truly believed in the existence of God. We were told what to believe and never questioned it that belief. In this essay, I will analyze the existence of god between “Does God Exist?” by Ernest Nagel and “Why God Allows Evil” by Richard Swinburne.
Although Nagel rejects the existence of God, he establishes two causes for why God exists. The first argument is the cosmological argument stating on page 223 “everything that exists is caused to exist by something else”. If everything is caused to exist by something …show more content…
Many believe that the universe started with the big bang. Others believe that the universe is endless and the existence of the universe has always just been there. With no time and no space, the universe started without nothing prior to the big bang. The problem with the cosmological argument is that it does not explain the existence of the universe. A theologist would state God had to start the universe and Nagel questions, what caused God? In response the theologist would say God is …show more content…
However, Nagel does not think God exists at all, Nagel dismisses Swinburne’s article since he assumes God does exist. Nagel illustrates the idea of watching an orchestra playing music and if you are standing too close to one instrument it seems really loud, if you step back you can see it all in context. A theologist would respond to this and say in the world evil is bad to us, but since we’re too close to it we need to step back and see the big picture in God’s view. Nagel says that this is a hypothesis about God’s plan, while Swinburne believes that no one knows God’s plan at

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of The Kalam Cosmological Argument
    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of The Kalam Cosmological Argument

    In this paper I will further expand and explain Craig’s argument and also provide some of my own insight on Mackie’s objections. In this Kalam cosmological argument if you can prove that the premises are true you must accept that the concluding…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    The second argument is that if everything in the universe needs a cause, then so must God. Manis and Evans make the observation that God is not a contingent being so it is unnecessary to provide an explanation of his beginnings. They point out that God would not be God if we humans were able to trace His origins. Through this reasoning we can believe that God is the…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Craig's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Craig's Argument For The Existence Of God

    Ignoring Craig’s second sentence, I have crudely taken his argument arranged it in the form of a syllogism to better analyze the structure of his argument. It goes as follows: Major: Something that begins to exist has a cause. Minor: Our universe is something that began to exist.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Julian's Theory Of Evil
    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Julian's Theory Of Evil

    The problem of evil is an atheistic argument, against the existence of God. It is a deductive argument that pits the existence of unjustified evil against the existence of any kind of divine being. Julian of Norwich presents a response to the problem of evil, but there are also some possible holes in Julian’s theory. This paper explores the problem of evil and how it is connected to human suffering, Julian’s theory in response to the problem, and a critique of Julian’s theory. One must assume that an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God exists.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis
    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis

    Therefore, something distinct from the universe, some unconditional agent would be necessary to have created the universe. McCloskey also claims that the cosmological argument “does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-respect, uncaused cause.” In light of Evans and Manis, we might response that the argument from design only seems to show the existence of a necessary being that is the cause of the universe. (Evans & Manis, 2009).…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Osmological Argument Analysis
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Osmological Argument Analysis

    Craig that he is “the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheist.” In this debate the same will occur for my opponent and all reading. Argument 1: Kalam Cosmological argument (KCA) (Heavily influenced by Dr. Craig’s presentation on the subject) P1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause “Nihil fit ex nihilo” That is to say that nothing comes from nothing.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God

    Cosmological argument The cosmological argument is a well known argument that attempts to prove the existence of God. The most common leader of the argument is Thomas Aquinas who devised Five Ways to prove the existence of God, which he referred to as “demonstration.” It comes to the conclusion that God exists from posteriori because it focuses on cause and effect to come to an assumption that God exists, which contrasts with the priori approach to the ontological argument. Linear religions generally accept that God made the universe ex nihilo because in Genesis God existed at the beginning of time; therefore, He must be the cause of the universe because you can’t have an effect without a cause.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Evidential Problem Of Evil In Richard Swinburne's 'Why God Allows Evil'
    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evidential Problem Of Evil In Richard Swinburne's 'Why God Allows Evil'

    Richard Swinburne’s “Why God Allows Evil” tackles the concept of the Evidential Problem of Evil, justifying the existence of evil within the world we live in. He has a plethora of reasons on why God allows evil to exist, and one, in which seems to be pausing for the audience at a glance, is that he believes that the extent of suffering humans are capable is within the limits of the right God has to cause humans to suffer (Swinburne 93-94). In other words, Swinburne states that the suffering in which humans are capable of enduring is, in the end, all for a greater or better purpose. What Richard Swinburne fails to address is that this is not something that is widely accepted by everyone. There are those who suffer for all their lives, those…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument
    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument

    In the middle of the 17th century, thinkers in the enlightenment began to question how belief in the existence of a monotheistic God could be rationally supported. A number of arguments for and against the existence of God emerged at this time, and while the philosophical debate on the existence of God is still in session, the initial dust has settled. At this point in time, it is abundantly clear that a the cosmological argument is untenable at both a metaphysical and empirical level, and that the various versions of the cosmological argument fail to support the existence of God. There is good reason for critically examining the cosmological argument. Theists have made a claim that God exists.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument Of Good Vs. Evil And The Existence Of God
    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Argument Of Good Vs. Evil And The Existence Of God

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Examples Of The Cosmological Argument
    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Examples Of The Cosmological Argument

    In other words, the cosmological argument is a philosophical argument, which means that everything has a cause for the reason it is there, and that there must have been a first cause, and that this first cause was itself uncaused. Some say the cosmological argument is the most logical argument in the eyes of western logicians…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God

    The existence of the universe, the argument claims, stands in need of explanation, and the only adequate explanation of its existence is that it was created by God. In simple words, cosmological argument for exsitence of god is this argument was argue that the cause of those things existence had be a “god-typed” thing, argument go all the way back to Plato and have been used by notable philosophers and thelogians ever since. Besides being philosophically evident, science finally caught up with theologians in the 20th centry when it was confirmed that universe had to have had a beginning, so today, the arguments even powerful for…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle's Cosmological Argument: The Existence Of God
    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle's Cosmological Argument: The Existence Of God

    The Existence of God This argument about the existence of God, better known as the cosmological argument, begins with the late philosopher Aristotle. Similar to a modern day natural scientist, he believed that we could ascertain more about the world and the very fundamental nature of things within our world just by observing and recording. In many ways Aristotle resemble a modern day artist, a person who goes through life experiencing and watching all different types of energy that’s around, visually records this information and help others by spreading this knowledge to the mass. Aristotle too, would look and study the world and its patterns that were around him in order to gain insight into his world.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing Descartes And Hegel's Philosophy
    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing Descartes And Hegel's Philosophy

    Descartes and Hegel are both important models in the world of philosophy; particularly they play key roles in trying to make sense of a philosophical God, and his role in our lives. Descartes reasoned that since he does not freely create what is in his consciousness, something else outside of his consciousness and, thus, greater than him must also exist. On the contrary, Hegel’s central philosophy rested on the idea that people have purpose because they have stories. In addition, Hegel believes God’s purpose is shown through history. Notably, each of these philosophers had revolutionary ideas on the reason God exists.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings