• Home Page
  • Why Do People Have To Follow Rule

Why Do People Have To Follow Rule

Improved Essays
Show More
Why are we having to follow orders and obey laws by authority figures? Maybe because it was just how we were brought up. Or possibly because we don’t want to suffer the consequences, if we break these laws. They may be burned, shot, or tortured some other way if not doing so. This will make people have no choice then follow rules by authority figures. According to the author, “Milgram’s experiment has become a classic in psychology, demonstrating the dangers of obedience” (Cherry) It was very intense, and was a very horrifying way to memorize the words they knew.

When someone was asked a question, in the electric chair. They would be shocked every time they answered a question incorrectly. And then the voltage was raised more and more

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Critique Of Stanely Milgram's Experiments
    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Critique Of Stanely Milgram's Experiments

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    Laws and moral codes must be backed up by force because a society works best when people work together rather than trying to gain individual dominance over another. Since society is like a “social contract”, it is believed that punishment is necessary otherwise people would break the rules every time it was in their interest to do so. Absolute sovereignty is the ideal government because, according to Hobbes, is most able to keep the peace. Civil power is used to force everyone to follow what they have agreed to in terms of the “social contract” to protect us from ourselves. It is necessary to make sure that an individual is too afraid of the punishment to try and gain dominance over another so the peace can be…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram Experiments On Obedience Analysis
    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stanley Milgram Experiments On Obedience Analysis

    In the articles “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” and “Review of Stanly Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience,” authors Theodore Dalrymple and Diana Baumrind describe the aspects of the Stanley Milgram experiment, while they both partake different topics to discuss. Dalrymple, a British physician, claims that there is a difference between blind obedience and blind disobedience, and there should be a healthy balance between the two (Dalrymple 119). However, Baumrind believes that the subjects should have been treated in a more enhanced way; therefore, claiming that the experiment unsuitably took advantage of the inherent trust and obedience given by the subject when volunteering to participate (Baumrind 89). These two articles are relevant to…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram Obedience Experiment
    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Milgram Obedience Experiment

    Many agree that the Milgram experiment could not be reproduced today due to its circumstances. According to Chapter 1 in the book, concealing the true intent of an experiment is entirely ethical in psychological research for the sake of experimental validity. The experimenter’s lie that the experiment was about the effects of punishment on learning rather than compliance to obedience is perfectly fine, since the results might not have been as accurate otherwise. The real issue comes with the emotional trauma that the experiment could cause to its participants. The mental damage that comes from knowing that you are capable of such horrible things just because someone told you to do them is quite a glaring issue in the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Stanley Milgram's Two Stages Of Obedience
    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of Stanley Milgram's Two Stages Of Obedience

    Milgram proposed that people operate on two levels. First, they operate as autonomous individuals, where they act according to their own values and beliefs. Second, they act on an agentic level where they see themselves as agents, acting on behalf of somebody else and not responsible for their own actions. He asserted that it is possible to move from an autonomous state into an agentic state; this is referred to as an agentic shift (Milgram, 1963). A consequence of this shift is that an individual no longer feels responsible for their actions.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Perils Of Obedience In A Few Good Men By Aaron Sorkin
    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Perils Of Obedience In A Few Good Men By Aaron Sorkin

    A Few Good Men was written by Aaron Sorkin and it is about a lawyer trying to defend two marines accused of murder. The two marines claimed to have received an order to discipline another marine and killed him in the process. The lawyer, Lt. Daniel Kaffee, then has to gather evidence for this claim and eventually get Colonel Jessep to state he gave the marines the order. The story encompasses many factors of obedience to authority and peer pressure and shows what can happen when orders are followed blindly. Many experiments and studies have taken place to explain why people follow orders even if it might violate their morals and result in someone getting hurt.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Perils Of Obedience Stanley Milgram Analysis
    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Perils Of Obedience Stanley Milgram Analysis

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram's The Atrocity Of Obedience
    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stanley Milgram's The Atrocity Of Obedience

    In Milgram’s essay “The Perils of Obedience,” he states “the real focus of the experiment is the teacher” (692). During the process there was a teacher, student, and experimenter, the students were hired actors. The experiment consisted of the teacher giving the student words in which the learner had to repeat them back, and if they got them wrong they would be shocked and the voltage would elevate with each wrong answer. Throughout the process and various teachers, Milgram saw different reactions, only one stood up for the learner refusing to proceed based on the learner’s reactions, another laughed uncontrollably, and the rest followed orders with no remorse regardless of how the student reacted (Milgram 695). Milgram’s point was “to extricate himself from this plight, the subject must make a clear break with authority” (693).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Perils Of Obedience Experiment Summary
    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Perils Of Obedience Experiment Summary

    Milgram selected many people at random and split them into the teacher and the learner roles. The teacher would read a set of words to the learner, if the answer was wrong a shock was exerted to the learner. As the experiment continued, the voltage would go up. The teachers did not…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis
    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    Because the experiment takes place in a laboratory, Baumrind argues that participants will not act how they might in the real world. She states that the laboratory is an unaccustomed setting for a typical being and may cause anxiety and passivity (225). Correspondingly, Saul Mcleod, a psychologist who summarizes and critiques Milgram’s experiment, states that the “important” location of the experiment, obedience levels increased (Simply Psychology). The point about setting is one in which Baumrind and Parker are able to reach a consensus.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Summary Of Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience
    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary Of Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Perils Of Obedience In Ella Enchanted
    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Perils Of Obedience In Ella Enchanted

    Many people in our society have been taught, starting in their early years of life, that they should be obedient to those older than them or those placed in a position of authority. Being taught from a young age that disobeying will lead to harsh consequences. But what if one is asked to do something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Why is it that most people in society seem to act under compulsion when faced with things they don’t care to do? What makes it so hard for them to disobey in that moment?…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram's Experiment Essay
    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Milgram's Experiment Essay

    She argues that the experiment was affecting the participant even after they were done and had been de-briefed of what the study was actually about, as well as seeing and talking to the ”learner” (the guy who they thought they were electrocuting). Baumrind was also arguing the fact the the experiment had little ecological validity as subjects are more prone to abide in such environments, she also states that participants experienced long-term, negative psychological consequences as a result of their participation in Milgram’s experiment. Milgram had counterpoints for all of her statements, explaining himself and his thought process and why it was necessary towards the experiment. Baumrind says that Milgram 's experimental situations are not sufficiently accurate models of real-life experience, his sampling techniques are seldom of a scope which would justify the meaning with which he would like to endow his result, as well as result are hard to reproduce. These combined is considered unethical, as this experiment would never have been accepted by any institutions today.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics In The Milgram Experiment
    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethics In The Milgram Experiment

    The Milgram Experiment In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram (1993-1984) began an experiment that would test to see how obedient people would be no matter the circumstances. One experiment Milgram performed consisted of volunteers shocking someone they did not know if he or she did not answer a question correctly. As the questions are answered incorrectly, the voltage would rise. Unknown to the volunteer, the subject that is being shocked is an actor that is not being electrocuted, and the volunteer was the subject of the experiment. As the experiment continued, the volunteers began to become stressed (Taylor, Peplau, & Sears, 2005, p. 228).…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Panopticism In The Novels Of John Berger And Michel Foucault
    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Panopticism In The Novels Of John Berger And Michel Foucault

    We hold each other accountable for doing the right thing at all times if you break the rules you are seen as a different individual. We do not need authority figures around all the time because the allusion of someone watching us is there at all times. This is causing the people to be scared of breaking the rules not only…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings