The imaginary audience is a concept that any youth will believe that they are the focus of any social activity. An example of this would be believing that the ketchup which was accidentally spilled on your shirt at prom was as embarrassing to everyone else as it was to yourself. Personal fable is more simple, it is the internal belief that the youth is invulnerable. Social theory predicts that the personal fable is what leads to experimentation with drugs, sex, etc. The interesting results found by the study were that troubled youth and non-troubled youth display no statistical difference of egocentrism. Essentially, all teenages are rather self focused. The only difference they did find was in epistemic reasoning. Furthermore, it was shown that troubled teens often rely on defended realism whereas non-troubled teens relied on postskeptical rationalism. As mentioned earlier, epistemic reasoning is the method which people use to make sense of new information that causes uncertainty. Defended realism allows an individual to differentiate between facts and opinion. In the book, Epistemic Cognition and Development: The Psychology of Justification and Truth, Moshman goes on to add, “This distinction enables them to preserve an epistemic core of
The imaginary audience is a concept that any youth will believe that they are the focus of any social activity. An example of this would be believing that the ketchup which was accidentally spilled on your shirt at prom was as embarrassing to everyone else as it was to yourself. Personal fable is more simple, it is the internal belief that the youth is invulnerable. Social theory predicts that the personal fable is what leads to experimentation with drugs, sex, etc. The interesting results found by the study were that troubled youth and non-troubled youth display no statistical difference of egocentrism. Essentially, all teenages are rather self focused. The only difference they did find was in epistemic reasoning. Furthermore, it was shown that troubled teens often rely on defended realism whereas non-troubled teens relied on postskeptical rationalism. As mentioned earlier, epistemic reasoning is the method which people use to make sense of new information that causes uncertainty. Defended realism allows an individual to differentiate between facts and opinion. In the book, Epistemic Cognition and Development: The Psychology of Justification and Truth, Moshman goes on to add, “This distinction enables them to preserve an epistemic core of