What's Wrong With Animal Rights Summary

Improved Essays
In the article “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights”, author Abby Hearne states that the current animal rights movement is “built upon a misconceived premise that rights were created to prevent us from unnecessary suffering.” This mixed with the misunderstanding of animal happiness and what it really means. This paper is written for people who are supporters of the current animal rights movement.
The author Abby Hearne’s main argument in this essay is that our definition of animal rights is fundamentally wrong. This is because we are under the assumption that animal rights are to protect animals from unnecessary suffering. We do this by how we show animal rights propaganda. She backs this up by showing us another perspective on the way that wild animals live versus that animals that we keep in captivity. For example, she states that “75 percent of the lions cubbed do not survive to the age of two. For those who do make it to two, the average age at death is ten years.” This in comparison to the fact that “Asali, the movie and TV lioness, was still working at the age of twenty-one.” She talks about this to argue against the movement’s belief that having animals in captivity that are either killed to be made into food and those used to perform live longer than those in the wild. Those
…show more content…
Her stance is that we must have a relationship of mutual obedience. You must develop a way of communication with an animal. She compares this to the relationship that is shared between a government and a citizen. This can be shown by your ability to vote. In her words, “I obey the government, and, in theory, it obeys me, by counting my ballot.” Just as with you and the government, she has developed this same type of communication with her pet. This relationship is how she believes that an animal can pursue its own personal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Ten Trusts Analysis

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The authors want you to see that we are ungrateful for the species around us. They want you to realize that you need to respect animals, and look at them as if they are like you. Since our brains are complex, we can think rationally. Our brains allow us to speak with words in a sophisticated way. This has led humans to believe they are not part of the animal kingdom.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The appearance of various right movements resulted in giving full specter of rights to millions of people and erased cultural confusion and tensions existed earlier. But the animal right movement faced us with another sort of cultural confusion. Some animal right activists believe that animals should be given more rights as creatures which can’t protect themselves. The arguments which the author brought to our attention were about how to treat the animals.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More than 150 billion animals are slaughtered each year. Compare that to the 13,000 people that were murdered just last year. Now obviously it is not feasible to take those two statistics into consideration when talking about the feelings of animals. But philosopher Peter Singer is right to claim that human suffering and animal suffering should be given equal consideration. Australian philosopher, Peter Singer, starts off his argument by comparing the ethics behind women’s rights to that of animal rights.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hesse G. Sambaan September 25, 2017 Comp II What’s wrong with the animal rights by Vicki Hearne Vicki Hearne thinks that there is more for animal satisfaction for happiness that is the personal achievement. Animals find happiness in their work that they do that you can call “talent”. She believes that animal right advocates got all it wrong, making some of the animals suffer and they are more concern of arguing than the animal’s happiness. The essay was persuasive, she uses her own knowledge as animal trainer and she proves that the only one who can really define the animal’s happiness is the owner. to clarify her own essays, she also uses her own animals, her experienced, and a lot of examples.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison of “All Animals Are Equal and Moral Standing,” the “Value of Lives, and Speciesism” the key differences are based on the values outlined by the writers. In Value of Lives and Speciesism, Frey discusses the importance of animals feel pain and suffer just as humans do, but also admits that there are reasons such as necessary medical research for harming animals. On the other hand, Singer’s All Animals Are Equal focuses on the rights of hemostats in comparison to those who can make intelligent decisions. The question is should non-human animals have rights and how far do those rights reach? Both agree that animals should have rights, but their major differences including, pleasure and pain, hierarchy, consumption, and richness of life.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Animal Essay For centuries man has always had the upper hand over animals but animal activists are now trying to sway the argument to prove that animals should be treated at the same standard as humans. Activists are working hard to show that all animals, from the smallest fish to the largest elephant, can feel pain, emotions, and human connections. After reading the articles I have concluded that an animal bill of rights should be added the the United States Government. I believe that this Bill of rights should provide standards and regulations to how animals are kept and cared for, It should also cover laws of what humans should and should not be allowed to to to animals, for example, slaughterhouses versus bull fighting, and finally the bill of rights should not state nor infer that animals should not be treated with the same standard or be “legally declared a person”(Yong 38).…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Proctor argues that since humans and animals both have the ability to feel positive and negative emotions, they both deserve the respect and the right to not be treated cruelly. Marian Stamp Dawkins expands on the idea that animals deserve to be treated without cruelty in “The Science of Animal Suffering.” Dawkins addresses humanity’s moral obligation to treat animals with dignity and explains how humans can accomplish this different relationship with animals. Robert Garner’s article, “In Defence of Animal Sentience: A Critique of Cochrane’s Liberty Thesis,” furthers the debate on animal rights to include not only the right to not suffer, but also include the right to not be used in any circumstance. Animal rights may only be fully achieved once humans recognize animals’ dignity as living beings.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paper 2 In this paper, I will discuss Mary Anne Warren's "Speaking of Animal Rights" which discusses the strength animals have to rights. Warren’s paper is rebuttal to Tom Regan “The Case for Animal Rights” I agree with Warren that humans' reason responsiveness makes human rights more important. I will explain her argument which focuses on humans' ability to listen to reason as morally relevant to the strength of their rights.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicholas D. Kristof explains that “[w]e disagree about where to draw the line to protect animal rights, but almost everyone now agrees that there is a line to be drawn” (Kristof 3). Kristof’s thoughts are very profound as it is widely accepted that animals are being mistreated, but many disagree on how animals should be protected and to what degree that protection goes. There must be a balance between protecting the welfare of animals and ensuring that human livelihood has utmost priority. In his letter to the editor response to “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Bob Stevens argues against the proposition of an animal bill of rights.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They struggle between morals, legal and philosophical questions brought up when debating the topic. Although today there are thousands of organizations that educate the public on the rights and mistreatment of nonhumans and the issues brought along with that. Today there are more people than ever standing up for the speechless, standing up for the helpless animals who cannot stand up for themselves. These animal rights activists are working together to enlighten the minds of those who do not believe animals have…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Through the animal rights songs, the songwriter promotes animal rights to those who subscribe to the Youtube channel and to the fan of the songwriter, singer, and the directors. The song asks us to visualise the misery that animals endure in today’s society, pleading us to let them out of their cages and grant them their freedom. In this era, many animals have been manacled by humans, be it in zoos or in circuses. The key message of the text is that animals have endured pains and suffered at the hands of humans, who cruelly take away animals’ rights to freedom. This is illustrated by the repeated uses of the word ‘please’ and ‘free’ throughout the lyrics, indicating that animal rights is so overlooked that animals have to implore us to grant…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Animals are not ours to eat. Animals are not ours to wear. Animals are not ours to experiment on. Animals are not ours to use for entertainment. Animals are not ours to abuse in any way.”…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    New York: Ecco Press, 2000. Print. Singer, Peter. 'Animal Liberation '. Animal Rights: The Changing Debate.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the world today, people cannot do without animals because they have become an essential part of human existence to both vegetarians and meat eaters. Some animals serve as pet, and some serve as food, and others are used for sports and laboratory experiments. Although some animal activist advocates for animal rights, there are limits to that right because animals cannot be equal with human. They don’t have the intellectual ability that humans have to take responsibilities and control what happens around them. These animals are important in the society and the need to treat them with respect is paramount.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays