They both changed things quite a bit and had long term outcomes The story would not have the same affect if one wasn’t included. If one was in fact excluded, the ending of the story could’ve been different as well. They both complete it, in a sense. If you want to focus on how the characters interact wit heach other, you’d argue that Finny’s fall would have been the true turning point of the story. It changed how everyone viewed each other and changed Gene and Finny’s relationship. But, if you want to think about how Gene changed his view on the world, you’d argue that his trip to Leper’s house was the turning point. The things that were said there really took a toll on him
They both changed things quite a bit and had long term outcomes The story would not have the same affect if one wasn’t included. If one was in fact excluded, the ending of the story could’ve been different as well. They both complete it, in a sense. If you want to focus on how the characters interact wit heach other, you’d argue that Finny’s fall would have been the true turning point of the story. It changed how everyone viewed each other and changed Gene and Finny’s relationship. But, if you want to think about how Gene changed his view on the world, you’d argue that his trip to Leper’s house was the turning point. The things that were said there really took a toll on him