What Is Thrasymachus View Of Justice

Improved Essays
To be just or not to be just? This is a question that the weak face as Thrasymachus views justice as the “advantage of the stronger” (Plato, The Republic, 338c). Thrasymachus’ view of justice is challenging as it benefits the rulers, and leaves the perspectives of the weaker unattended to, triggering us to ask the question: how can we find a solution to challenge Thrasymachus’ dark view of justice? Thrasymachus’ view of justice is one-sided, thus Cephalus and Polemarchus characterizes justice as the interest of the weak rather than only the strong, while Glaucon and Adeimantus entail that there is a discrepancy between the ruler’s definition of justice and the weak’s definition of justice.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question of justice in any situation concerning warfare is a difficult one to address, as many people hold opposing views on the righteousness of war itself. In the Aeneid, Virgil proposes a new question for readers to consider as he allows the main character, Aeneas, to undergo a change in mentality throughout the epic. The reader is forced to decide whether the killing of an opponent is deemed as just or unjust. Although many scholars have proposed differing definitions of justice, Plato provides one of the most reputable descriptions. When one utilizes the definition of justice that Plato proposes, he or she will acknowledge that Turnus and Aeneas both abide by the gods’ authority, thus promoting justice; however, after the gods’ influence…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Thrasymachus ‘Justice is the advantage of the stronger’. What does he mean by this and does Socrates succeed in proving him wrong? The name Thrasymachus means fierce fighter, and this certainly represents the character of the same name, who appears in book one of Plato’s Republic. Thrasymachus enters Plato’s world with a statement designed to shock, stating that “justice is the advantage of the stronger”.…

    • 2199 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Thrasymachus’ Conception on Justice In Friedrich Nietzsche’s work, The Genealogy of Morality, he states that the existence of laws establishes what is just and unjust within a given society (Nietzsche 1280; sec 12). Thus, there does not seem to be anything explicitly virtuous for justice. In reference to the Republic, I will argue Socrates and Thrasymachus have different views on justice and will ultimately disagree with each other on Nietzsche 's conception of justice. Nietzsche’s entire work is trying to dissect morality from its origins.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For centuries many individuals have questioned the true mean of social justice as depicted by the law. For instincts social ordered structure and misrepresentations of citizens are issues that should be attended to by individuals in power. Although at times this might be impossible because those in power are manipulated by corruption, causing many of us to feel the lack of social status. William Shakespeare’s “Measure for Measure” is a perfect example of power and corruption. Also would an individual has a right to declare themselves merciful in any given situation?…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By comparing “violence to the law” with giving “commands to those who are in power,” Kreon’s outlook that these two actions deserve equal punishment reveals Sophocles’ idea that justice serves the king absolutely. By focusing on the city and its leader, Sophocles finds justice due to personal interests falls behind what is best for the public. By stating “in just things and the opposite,” Kreon makes it clear that regardless of whether an action is just or not, if it is not going to benefit the city, mostly in regards to benefitting the king himself, then the action is…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, Thrasymachus and Socrates fall on opposite sides of the debate over whether leading a life of justice or injustice results in happiness. Thrasymachus argues justice in and of itself has no intrinsic value, but it is the appearance of justice that benefits the individual. Socrates, on the other hand, insists appearance alone is not enough but being truly just leads to an inner life of peace and balance. The unjust person experiences a turbulent internal existence, which leads to a life of misery and despair. I will argue that Socrates, despite making a strong case for the just city, fails in his argument for the happy life of just person.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Plato

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Plato’s Republic, Thrasymachus begins with the assertion of a hypothetical generalization: that laws are enacted for one’s own benefit. Although these laws may differ substantially contingent on the moral philosophy, distinct perceptions, or the beliefs entrenched in distinct systems of government, justice is patently defined. Political authority is not granted without the approval of a moral application of influence. Unequivocally, unless the weaker secure a tactical bargaining platform, justice will regularly be “advantageous for the stronger (15).” Under those circumstances, the disadvantaged are often compelled to challenge the higher authority when corruption or the immoral use of power becomes evident.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato's Republic transcribed by Plato, Socrates argues with Thrasymachus on the matter, is being just good and wise? Socrates asks Thrasymachus a question that eventually makes Thrasymachus rethink his position. Socrates makes the argument that justice is wise and good and injustice is ignorance and bad; however, Thrasymachus thinks alternatively in a sense that he defends injustice as being better of the two. Through Socrates’ method of elenchus, Socrates comes to the conclusion “the just has turned out to be wise and good and the unjust evil and ignorant” (The Republic 350c). Socrates arises to this conclusion because the just wouldn't want to exceed his like but the unjust would want to exceed his like and unlike simultaneously.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion, Thrasymachus was referencing “justice is the advantage of the stronger” to people who have the authority or power to make rules and regulations for others to follow; Thus abiding by the laws and one will be Just, however, if one should break that laws, he /she is unjust. He then cited an example for Socrates that “the different forms of government make laws democratically, aristocratically, tyrannical, with a view to their several interests; and these laws, which are made by them for their own interests, are the justice which they deliver to their subjects, and him who transgresses them they punish as a breaker of the law, and unjust”(paragraph 8.233). That is what he meant when he said, “ in all states, there is the same principle…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thrasymachus defines justice as what is advantageous to the stronger. This assumes a hierarchical society is always established. Those at the top of the hierarchy are thus able to decide what is and isn’t just by shaping other’s perception and standards of justice through laws or other means, including social norms. Justice for Thrasymachus, holds an instrumental utility for the people in power. The definition he poses doesn’t define justice as a tangible concept but a key characteristic of justice and how it is played out in a society.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposing view of justice in the podcast and Plato’s Republic is given by Thrasymachus, who claimed justice belonged to those with power as they have the strength to break the rules, exploiting the weaker. Breaking the law is more just than…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Let’s discuss the first subject – what justice is and what its origins are. http://missiontotransition.blogspot.ca/2013/11/why-be-moral-plato-republic-book-ii.html.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prompt for King’s letter goal is to compare and contrast Letter from a Birmingham Jail and Handbook of Epictetus. One section of King’s letter dealt with the issue of just and unjust laws and how direct action would effect the outcome. King and Epictetus had two different ways of dealing with unjust laws and the effect of them on an individual person. Their thoughts are similar but not similar enough that one could come to the conclusion that they would both agree. Even though they would not be able to agree, both of their solutions can be used together to form a peaceful solution.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Plato and Augustine believed justice to be a prominent virtue. In Plato’s time, the majority argued that it was reputation that mattered and not the actual act of justice, and that justice itself was burdensome. To Plato, justice was practiced not as a burden, but practiced so “that anyone who is going to be blessed with happiness must love both because of itself and because of its consequences” (Plato, Republic, 358a). Augustine’s view of justice was similar; however, his take on injustice differed. While Plato did not see injustice as extremely problematic, Augustine disagreed, stating, “It is better to suffer than to commit injustice” (Augustine, On Christian Doctrine, 85).…

    • 1091 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays