The Two-Party System Analysis

Great Essays
With the recent election, were you unable to relate to either of the presidential candidates? Most American citizens wished that there was another candidate, capable of winning, running because both candidates were so extreme. This dilemma occurred because of the two-party system, which runs the United States. If the United States was run by a multi-party system or a system by which no parties were present then there would be a very low chance that Donald Trump would be president due to how intensely the people dislike him. With a recent poll, about 14% of America thinks that the federal government works. This high level of dissatisfaction shows that Americans are in need of a change to our current system. These Americans that participated …show more content…
Two-party system advocators mainly focus on how stable the government is when compared to multi-party systems. “The two-party system is said to promote governmental stability because a single party can win a majority in the parliament and govern.” This is true, however, it will not allow change. The United States should keep its values and ideas. However, there comes a time when change to policies is essential. With party polarization, compromise will not allow for change to fix problems. Many will also advocate that the two-party system is what the founders intended. This is not the truth because political parties are not mentioned whatsoever in the Constitution. Political parties emerged so that organizations could put their candidate in a spot where they have a higher probability of winning. American citizens should not have to choose between such opposite candidates when they would prefer a more moderate …show more content…
For example, if there are many extreme politicians that are trying to push forward a very specific path for the future of the United States, then nothing will ever be completed. It will never be completed because they will be unable to compromise due to their differing beliefs, which are opposite in everything except wanting the future of the United States to be great. The amount of time it takes to compromise will also be very high because their views are so different. Thus, creating more arguments and longer compromise periods. If there are many moderate politicians that are trying to push an agenda for the future of the country then there is a much higher chance of compromise that will come more quickly. Their ideas for the future of the country are more similar so that the compromise will be more fruitful. The time commitment to pushing forward a new policy is also a very big factor. It takes a very long time to pass a bill in today’s government because of the intensity of the arguments. However, if there were many moderate politicians then compromise would come quicker and more policies would be able to follow at a faster rate. Thus, fixing the problem, and many more to follow, more effectively than many extreme politicians passing a less fruitful policy in a longer amount of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Democratic Party and the Republican Party have changed in the past 200 years to the point where not much is accomplished in the Legislative branch. The two-party system has become a competition between the parties rather than cooperation in order to achieve the greater good for the country as a whole. In fact, in a poll from 2012, only about 14% of Americans believed that the federal government works (Darrell West). When two parties focus more on their own ambitions, the good of the country is overlooked and it leads to an unsuccessful governing body. This has been a concern since the birth of the country; the second president, John Adams, voiced his thoughts on the two-party system, “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They are not trying to compromise or think of the public's interest: rather they are thinking of…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning with the election of 1848, America began to see the dismantlement of the long-standing two party system as it no longer met the needs of the American people. Slavery became a central issue of upcoming presidential and congressional elections alike; people were no longer voting for the party they might have previously aligned with but rather for the party and candidate that most closely shared their views on the issue of slavery. The old party system didn’t address this issue as successfully as the nation needed, as can be seen with the Whig party, a once power political group, that quickly fell apart as slavery became more and more of a national concern. As the years progressed, and the issue of slavery became more and more polarizing,…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to improve bipartisan relations and increase the public cooperation among diverse groups, I propose three options to successfully obtain the goal. First of all, having only two major parties has separated the United States, so a third party could be created to maximize vocalized opinions. This third party would have different views, of course, but in the end, the tripartisan relationship could be one of checks and balances. Having one party control the government is highly dissatisfactory for many people, but it is nearly impossible to have our government be equally represented by both sides. If each party was checked by two others and check the others, perhaps our government would be more diversely constituted.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Receding Parties In the early American history two major factors political groups share their ideas and beliefs on how this country should governed. These two parties – Republican and Democratic both believe that these decisions are, “Best for the country.” Eventually as time goes by people are beginning to start losing hope for these two parties due to the empty promises made by them, and the secret propaganda. There are more receding republican and the democratic parties, but more who claims to be independent.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Personal demands are sacrificed for the greater good, with seemingly strong reason. With weak political parties, more time is spent fighting over every last issue, which allows various factions-special interest groups- to saunter in and gain political influence, contrasting the point of the Madisonian system of democracy. This, along with weak leadership, leads to the alienation of American citizens from politics. Thus, in order to maintain American participation in politics and uphold collective responsibility, one must form a political ideology and conform to a party that aligns with those ideals. This conformism allows elected officials to get more done for the people by limiting conflict within parties and upholding party discipline.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Minority parties are extremely responsive to the nation’s views and with many parties being in charge, they are more able to represent people’s point of views and what they would like to be changed in the country. Passing bills is definitely a slower process but also, a more effective and efficient process. It is a slower policy making process because this system cannot go ahead based on their own views but are forced to take other opinions from the other parties into account. When deciding on a new policy, there is a lot of parties to show their point of view and all come from different parts of the country so this results in the policy making more representative and has a lot less discrimination. On the other hand, timing for urgent matters is a bit of a downfall as the government parties have to engage in long discussions and debates on the matter which takes up an enormous amount of time.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am persuaded that the Federalist [Hamiltonian] political approach toward governing the young United States had stronger ideas versus the Republican [Jeffersonian] position, which lacked in forward thinking, suppressed free marketing and trade, sought to reduce the national army, and yet supported virtue of the common people. The American Revolution caused high war-debt issues, requiring immediate and effective attention, which in my opinion demanded a strong centralized government. Hamilton’s group, the Federalists, were made up of mostly educated bankers, merchants, and manufactures with some wealthy plantation owners interested in securing the future of the Union by force of “big government”. They believed that government control should be in the hands of the elite and wealthy, that there should be a National Bank, and the establishment of public credit, saying it was authorized by the constitution as “necessary and proper”. Hamilton wrote, “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men the great difficulty lies in this:…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is polarization? Throughout the course of American history, arguments occur regarding what role and function the government should play in the democratic process. Since the formation of two major political parties during the 1800s, political polarization began to impact how the government functions. According to Political Polarization in American Politics, polarization is defined as diverging from median Republican and Democratic views and increases when the political stances and ideologies move further to the left or right of the middle, central view (Hopkins and Sides 2015, 17).…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Historically, American politics has favored a competitive two-party system. Beginning in the late eighteenth century, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists created an intense division in American politics, which eventually developed into the modern Republican versus Democrat government of today. Despite citizen's unwavering devotion to the two-party system, minor political parties, based on strongly supported ideological convictions, have emerged, attempting to compete against the major political parties and expand their role and influence in the American political process; these "third parties" often face discrimination and challenges in the electoral system. Not often does a third party make a considerable impact on the political process…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zinn's Two-Party System

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Howard Zinn, a noted historian and social activist describes the American system as the “the most ingenious system of control in world history.” This system has perfected itself in manner that prevents the middle and working classes of the United States from joining together and actually challenging the system. Throughout his book, A People’s History of the United States, Zinn describes a plethora of government actions and major events that have contributed to this system. I believe that he would point to the advent of the two-party system as the event or series of events that did the most to lead us to our current situation.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reaching a compromise is important so that all factions have their ideals implemented. Although this often results in a status quo bias, it impedes majority and minority tyranny from developing. Government promotes compromise between the majority and minority groups. The problem of factions is solved by forcing factions to compete with each other. Fragmented democratic institutions are set­up to allow federal laws to be passed.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the War of 1812 occurred, America experienced mainly a two-party system between the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Both parties had completely different views concerning politics. The Federalist party was led by Alexander Hamilton who supported a stronger central government and a loose interpretation of the constitution. However, the Democratic-Republican party was led by Thomas Jefferson who supported state’s rights and a strict interpretation of the constitution. After the War of 1812, a one-party system developed due to the collapse of the Federalists party at the Hartford Convention in 1815.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    common interests. This is one of the reasons why Madison wanted more territories, more states, and more districts in the United States to prevent having a majority and separate powers. Furthermore, he did not think democracy would efficiently work in such a large country like the United States since the territory is overly large to keep all men in politics. Democracy only efficiently worked in small states because everyone was able to participate in politics such as Athena in ancient Greece.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republican Party is moving in a more conservative direction and the Democratic Party staying consistently liberal on major issues of public policy (Jones 2001). Particularly in congress empirical research shows the parties in our government are becoming more homogenous in their political positions, while the differences among the party’s on policy issues continues to magnify (Jones 2001). In congress alone, polarization is visible by that fact that “since 1990 more than half of the congressional votes have featured a majority of one party opposing a majority of another” (Jones 2001). This intense polarization has had major effects on the relationship between congress and the president in particular. Looking at the theory of divided government it explains that legislation is less likely to get passed when the…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays