Capital Punishment Essay: This Big Issue Of The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
Capital Punishment also known as the Death Penalty is a legal and in some states, countries illegal process where a person is put to death by the state for a consequence and punishment for a crime they have done. The Judicial state of someone be punished for their crime is known as a death sentence, however the actual state of it is an execution. The crimes that are down resulting in the death penalty are crimes that are known as both capital crimes and or offenses. Today there are “. Currently 58 nations actively practice capital punishment, 98 countries have abolished it de jure for all crimes, 7 have abolished it for ordinary crimes only, and 35 have abolished it de facto.” (http://www.thethinkingblue.com/americashame.html) In the past …show more content…
Georgia, Ford vs. Wainwright, Furman vs. Georgia, Kennedy vs. Louisiana, an Executive order made in Colorado, and it goes against the 8th …show more content…
Georgia the Supreme Court rules 7-2 that the crime of rape is unconstitutional. The people in this court case was Coker who had escaped prison where he was serving for multiple different sentences of murder, rape, kidnapping and for aggravated assault. Coker was also committed more crimes of rape, kidnapping and armed robbery which the state of Georgia sentenced him to death and he appealed. In this case there were multiple victims because had done multiple crimes, but there was one couple, Allen and Elnita Carver where Coker entered their home threatened the couple and then tied up Mr. Carver in the bathroom. He then took a knife from the kitchen and took Mr. Carver’s money and keys to his car. Coker raped Mrs. Carver and then kidnapped her in the Carver’s family car. Mrs. Carver was not injured besides the rape and kidnapping and when Mr. Carver freed himself and called the police Mrs. Carver was very much alive. Coker was convicted of all his charges of rape, kidnapping, escape, armed robbery, and motor vehicle theft which is when the state of Georgia sentenced him to death .The biggest issue of this case was that is the imposition of death penalty of rape unconstitutional? According to the 8th amendment of the U.S. it forbids the cruel and unusual punishment. According to this court case the imposition of the death penalty of rape is in fact unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruling was 7-2 which was not unanimous, the 7 votes were for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The original case before it went to the Supreme Court was State v. Fish and Hubbard. A fight broke out between Fish and a man named Miller in a bar in Black Eagle, Montana. Fish was with a woman named Skelton who called her brother Hubbard to help. Hubbard also brought his friend Lodge to help in the fight. Miller left the bar and Skelton, Fish, Hubbard and Lodge decided to go to Millers house directly.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simmon's death sentence was overturned on grounds that the opinions of the public and national learned organizations reflect a consensus that would not support such executions (FindLaw, 2017). They acknowledged that the execution of juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment based on the standards of decency test. The state of Missouri appealed the ruling upholding that the death penalty for crimes committed by 16…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This leads to the question: Does the State of Louisiana violate the Eight Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment by imposing the death sentence for the crime of child rape? Jeffery L. Fisher is the defense attorney that is appealing on behalf of Patrick Kennedy. On the opening statement of Jeffery Fisher, he brought up a fact to the court that the United States has not executed any offender for rape in over forty years. Mr. Fisher had two arguments he wanted to address to the court.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Georgia. The United States Supreme Court had requested the writ of certiorari to further their decision and also decided to affirm the state's decision, the court affirmed the previous sentence seven to two in favor of the state on July 2, 1976. The United States Supreme Court decided to take on the case due to their beliefs and opinions on morals in society. The court wanted to clarify the issue of the death penalty to further emphasize or change the current laws that were in place as well as to terminate further discussion and finalize the court’s decision on cases that included the death penalty seeing as there were many who disagreed with the sentence as well as the sentence's relation to the constitution. On July 2, 1976 the United States Supreme Court had made a decision which had affirmed the previous sentences against Troy Gregg.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court stated that unless a uniform policy of determining who is eligible for capital punishment exists. The death penalty will be regarded as “cruel and unusual punishment.” Due to the Furman v. Georgia case, the death penalty was ruled illegal within the United States in…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court ruled that the execution of minors is cruel and punishment prohibited by the 8th…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Prior to reading his thoughts I would say that I probably sat on the fence in the middle, I wasn’t really for it nor was I against it. However, after really reading what Judge Marshall said about the topic, I do believe it is a violation of a person’s eighth amendment rights to cruel and unusual punishment. I feel that my decision goes further than the violation of the amendment. I also did a little extra research and found that it is more expensive to execute someone rather than have them serve a sentence of life without the…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furman V. Georgia

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It was held that imposition and carrying out of the death sentence in the cases presented, where the jury could decide after the trial whether…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bowell Vs Alabama

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Powell v. Alabama 287 U.S. 45 (1932) was a landmark case that would forever change the landscape of due process in the United States. This case brought into question what the courts were responsible for when it came to preserving the people rights, and more importantly how those rights should be carried out. The facts leading up to the case began in March when several white men in Alabama reported being thrown from a train by several African men, this prompted law enforcement to phone ahead to Scottsboro where the train was headed for and where the men were found with two white women by law enforcement(Samaha page 33).…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The U.S. Supreme Court would judge the case on whether sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life in prison without parole violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). Miller’s counsel argued that sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole without considering certain factors such as his age violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments’ ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). The state of Alabama argued that punishing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole does not violate the Eight or Fourteenth Amendment, but serves a justifiable penological goal when the crime is aggravated murder (Carrizales & Schultz,…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme court relied on the Substantive Due Process clause to overturn the previous courts ruling and argued that the ruling violated the S. Due Process Clause, as opposed to the Equal Protections Clause. However, Justice Sandra Day O ' Connor argued in favor of the Equal Protections Clause to overturn the state laws against sodomy. The Court recognized that the privacy rights of consenting adults cannot be violated as this violates the Constitution. You would first file a complaint with the court and deliver a copy to the defendant. The…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death Penalty History

    • 1076 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the end, the Supreme Court ruled the death penalty was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court later mandated that there should be a trial to determine guilt and another trial to determine the punishment. (Allen & Latessa,…

    • 1076 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has been argued over the years that capital punishment violates the eight amendment in the Constitution of the United States of America. It was argued that because the eighth amendment states that no cruel and unusual punishments should be inflicted upon anyone, so, capital punishment should not be used as a form of paying for a crime. What is not being taken under consideration, however, is the fact that the law has been morally and properly assessing these cases. How so? Well, lets begin by stating that the Supreme Court ruled in 1976 in the Gregg v. Georgia and Jurek v. Texas, that a death sentence did not violate the eighth amendment as the forms of execution have been reformed so that the punishments are not categorized as inhumane and cruel.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lloyd Turner Death Penalty

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Death Penalty Throughout history, people have condoned capital punishment and believe it to be a proper punishment for certain crimes. However, like with anything, there has been increasing scrutiny behind the death penalty. Capital punishment is the legal and politically correct way to refer to the death penalty. The death penalty has been around for thousands of years and has been performed in many different ways. Throughout time, the laws and rules surrounding this form of punishment have been altered and changed, and in many places, it has even been abolished.…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Caleb Barwick 11 August 2017 Death Equals Peace Should murderers, rapists, and terrorists be let back in society after serving time in jail just to repeat the crimes they already committed? Well, with the death penalty this will not be a problem. With the death penalty that is not possible for that to happen. The death penalty is necessary for punishment because it can help cut down on terrorism, Americans prefer it as punishment, and it is needed for serious crimes.…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays