• Home Page
  • What Is The Case Of R V Trieu Thanh Case

What Is The Case Of R V Trieu Thanh Case

Decent Essays
Show More
The case of R v Trieu Thanh (Criminal Case 2015). It was a day in 5/5/2015, Mr. Trieu was on the train heading to Liverpool to visit a friend. Suddenly, the police team appeared to check the tickets. At the very first time, they noticed him seemed mistrustful with a big suspicious bag, which was laid under the ground, when the police team came toward to check his ticket, he was frightened and immediately picked up his bag from the ground on his shaking legs. According to NSW Legal System, Summary Offences Act, a police officer has a power to search a person in a public place if the police officer suspects on reasonable grounds that the person has a dangerous implement in their custody (LEPRA, s 26). Moreover, under Law Enforcement (Powers

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    R V Mabior Case Summary
    • 3451 Words
    • 14 Pages

    R V Mabior Case Summary

    Facts of the Case On October 5, 2012, the case of R v. Mabior was taken to the Supreme Court of Canada; her Majesty the Queen is the appellant, and Clato Lual Mabior, the respondent. As well, nonparties known as the interveners are of grave importance to this imperative matter. There were a total of twelve interveners, including: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network and HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario, just to name a few (see Appendix A for full list).…

    • 3451 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Minnesota Vs Dickerson Case Summary
    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Minnesota Vs Dickerson Case Summary

    Name: Case brief assignment Prof: Minnesota v Dickerson, 508 U.S.3669 (1993) Facts of the case Two Minneapolis police officers were patrolling the North area of the city in a marked police car in the evening on November 9, 1989. There was the defendant, Timothy Dickerson, in a known drug zone. At around 8:15 p.m., one officer observed the defendant leaving a 12-unit apartment building along Morgan Avenue, a renowned drug sale premise.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    R. V. Hauser Case Study
    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    R. V. Hauser Case Study

    While studying the case R. v Hauser, it is clear to see why it is known to be one of the leading constitutional decisions in understanding the workings of Peace, order and good governments in relation to a power struggle of jurisdiction. The whole case surrounds the question on whether the Attorney General, or the Attorney General of Canada should have the power to control the prosecution under the Federal Narcotics Control Act. It is a battle for powers of jurisdiction in regards to the criminal code, and more so the Narcotics Control Act; (NCA), 1961. The Narcotics Act was once Canada’s national drug control statue prior to its repeal in 1996 where the Controlled Drugs and Substance Act took its place. The NCA upheld an international treaty which prohibited the production, and supply of specific drugs; normally narcotics, unless given a licence for specific…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    4th Amendment Case Study Answers
    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    4th Amendment Case Study Answers

    Sierra Fischer Exam 3 Answer According to the Fourth Amendment, an officer must have probable cause or a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed in order to search and seize an individual. Speeding, as well as having tinted windows and a taillight being out is enough reasonable suspicicion to pull Lil Flet over and inspect the car. As breaking the law gives an officer a reasonable belief that there may be evidence of a crime located within the vehicle. Additionally, identifying the smell of a drug is enough grounds for a search as it gives the officer probable cause.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    R V Gonzales Case Study
    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    R V Gonzales Case Study

    R v. Gonzales refers to a criminal case of a triple parricide by twenty year old Australian BOS: 28744455 Sef Gonzales which occurred on the 10th of July 2001. Sef’s motives for killing his father Teddy, Mother Mary Loiva and sister Clodine derived from his parent’s unattainable high expectations of him and his desire to financially benefit from their death. Having premeditated his crime, Sef entered Clodine’s room at 4pm armed with two kitchen knifes and a baseball bat and killed her. The cause of her death was the combined effect of the compression of her neck, the blunt force injuries and abdominal stab wounds. Sef’s mother arrived home an hour later and was ambushed in the living room by Sef, stabbing her multiple times, severing her windpipe.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    R V. Tran, 2010 SCC 58
    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    R V. Tran, 2010 SCC 58

    The Supreme Court of Canada is the foundation of Canadian Law in our society. It keeps the criminals at bay, and the innocent free. In my opinion, the Supreme Court of Canada does it’s job in upholding a high standard of effectiveness and success. It effectively balances the rights of individuals against the needs of society The case R v. Tran, 2010 SCC 58, [2010] 3 S.CE. 350 clearly portrays the effectiveness of the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arizona Vs Gant Case Studies
    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Arizona Vs Gant Case Studies

    SCOTUS decision in Arizona v. Gant (2009) affected the admissibility in federal prosecutions of evidence obtained by local, federal and local law enforcement agencies as the result of the search of an automobile incident to the lawful arrest. The Gant decision was not a winning situation for law enforcement. The Gant decision should have taken into consideration the arrestees and their immediate area of control for weapons, and to allow officers to prevent the destruction of evidence by the suspect. The United States Supreme Court arguably placed a limit on the ability of law enforcement officers to search of an vehicle incident to the arrest of the driver or an occupant. It curtailed the practices under New York v. Belton (1981) by removing…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Was It Necessary To Intervene In The Scenario
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Was It Necessary To Intervene In The Scenario

    1 Why was it necessary to intervene in the situation? On patrol as a special constable, there was an urgent report over the radio of a male that had been seen with a handgun. A description of the male was given and a direction of travel, which was the area I was patrolling. On patrol I saw a male matching the description and informed the control room straight away.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    R V. Keegstra Case Analysis
    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    R V. Keegstra Case Analysis

    The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in Canada, the final court of appeal, and the last legal resort for all litigants; therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada decisions are the ultimate expression and application of Canadian law (Supreme Court of Canada tour). The landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in the R v. Keegstra case regarding the freedom of expression portrays the theoretical concepts behind the court’s ruling as it is the job of the court to deliver a fair decision to the parties involved, as well as a decision that maintains law and order in society. The R v. Keegstra ruling contains insights from the consensus theory and the labelling theory, as the decision of the court was in the interest of the public. To better understand a criminal law case and come up with a conclusion, the theory used must have a valid structure and must follow the rules of critical thinking and logic (Boyd, Cartwright and Heidt, 2015: 120). Also, the purpose of the criminal law must be understood as criminal law serves a purpose, which takes into account some theoretical aspects of the consensus theory and…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Consent To Search
    • 1052 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Consent To Search

    a) Consent to Search In R v. Wills (1992) the court found the following criteria necessary for a valid consent search: 1. There was consent, expressed or implied; 2. The giver of the consent had the authority to give the consent; 3. The consent was voluntary (not police coerced); 4. The giver of consent was aware of the police conduct; 5.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Stop, Question And Frisk Analysis
    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Stop, Question And Frisk Analysis

    The NYPD implementation of its Stop, Question, and Frisk program under Mayor Bloomberg and the NYPD Commissioner Kelly has been a heavy controversial subject for decades (Garrison, 2014). Stop-and-Frisk has also been a contentious law enforcement practice since it was first approved by the Supreme Court (Rudovsky and Rosenthal, 2013). Terry Vs. Ohio established the Stop-and-Frisk act in 1968, concluding that the law enforcement had the right to stop citizens under reasonable suspicion that they have committed, committing or going to commit a crime. It was also concluded that if the law enforcement suspected citizens to be armed and/or dangerous, they could conduct a “frisk” or a pat down to citizens outer clothing in search for weapons.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case
    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Moot Court Case

    The Fourth Amendment was created by our Founding Fathers for this exact reason. If a police officer can conduct a warrantless search without receiving adequate consent then our Fourth Amendment right to privacy will continue to be violated, a violation our great Constitution does not permit. In Matlock, the court decided that a third party could give consent to search if they had common authority over the object or premises. U.S. v. Matlock, 415 S. Ct. 164, 171 (1974).…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Police Malpractice Case Study
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Police Malpractice Case Study

    Section 2 The issue here is whether or not the criminal procedure has been fairly applied to Dave’s situation. According to section 41 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 1984 , a person detained without charge cannot be held for more than 24hrs except for indictable offences like murder. If a police officer wants to question the suspect he must give the caution set out in s 10.1 code C of PACE.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Search And Seizure Laws In Michelle Alexander's The New Jim Crow
    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Search And Seizure Laws In Michelle Alexander's The New Jim Crow

    Search and seizure laws have been around since the beginning of the United States of America, and have a very controversial history. Many deem the way the laws are practiced unconstitutional, and oppressive to minorities, while others think they are just and need to be carried out to stop crime. Police officers have found many missing persons and have also brought down many drug dealers all while staying in the lines of legal search and seizure. Many people fear officers can overstep their boundaries and think that search and seizure laws are the underlying cause of mass incarceration, which Michelle Alexander examines in her book The New Jim Crow.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Plenty V Dillon Case Study
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plenty V Dillon Case Study

    The following outlines the material facts, key legal issues and common law rules in Plenty v Dillon. Material Facts in Plenty v Dillon. Police officers Michael Kenneth Dillon and Robyn Ann Will entered the property of Sydney Graham Plenty on the 5th of December 1978 to serve a summons on his daughter in accordance with the Juvenile Courts Act 1971 (S.A.). The property was a small farm located near Port Pirie in South Australia.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings