The author describes the 1960’s counterculture movement as “The post-World War II baby boomers grew up, a president and prominent civil rights leaders were assassinated, the Vietnam War dragged on for years, millions of Americans openly experimented with psychoactive drugs, and rock and roll music became a cacophonous national anthem” (pg. 10 Sixties Counterculture).
The 1960s were a chaotic time. Change was happening in the United States, whether the U.S. was ready for it or not. According to Sixties Counterculture book, there are five main parts to the counterculture. These five parts include the seeds of/what contributed to the counterculture, war protestors, hippies and the psychedelic revolution, guerrilla politics, and black power. The 1960’s counterculture symbolically began on February 2, 1960 when four African-American students did a sit in at a lunch counter (The Sixties). These students were at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical College in Greensboro. Their actions to sit at the lunch counter and not move until they were served, showed a want for change in the societal norms of the community. Other sit ins started to occur throughout the United States to push for …show more content…
He and his family moved to Hibbing, Minnesota when Dylan was six years old. Anthony Scaduto, a writer for the Rolling Stone, talked with Eric von Schmidt, someone who was close to Dylan in his earlier years. In Scaduto’s article from 1972, “Bob Dylan: An Intimate Biography,” Von Schmidt makes the statement that “Dylan was continually inventing himself,” and that those inventions of himself came to be called the “Dylan myths.” The article talks about how there would be myths of something that he never did but they were a metaphor for what he wanted. One myth referenced was that Dylan started running away but Schmidt talks about that myth being a metaphor of Dylan running away from himself and from what his parents and teachers and community wanted him to