All ethical theories address the topic of what is morally good and morally bad. On the off chance that there is anything simple about good request, there’s certainty that there are just three fundamental sorts which are teleological theories, deontological theories, and virtue based theories.
Teleological theory means consequentialist theories suggest that the moral value, the moral rightness or wrongness of an act, is entirely a function of the consequences or the results of that act. This theory is more so about the certain consequences one would obtain from a certain behavior, and not the actual behavior itself. If you were a mother and had a starving kid, and you went out to the grocery store and stole food, the question that would puzzle philosophers would be what is morally right in one’s mind as on the contrary what is morally wrong, however motives don’t really have anything to do with the rightfulness or the wrongfulness of an act. As Ronald White states, “from …show more content…
This theory is mostly based on rules and regulations, and an objective. Many philosophers even completely reject the teleological theory. The philosophers who don’t believe in the teleological theory are the ones who believe moral goodness have nothing to do with the consequences of one’s actions. Deontologist’s believe that “morality is based on whether acts conflict with moral rules or not” (White 2009). A deontologist, however, would argue that even if the American government conducted a detailed cost/benefit analysis of slavery and decided it created more pleasure in society than pain, it would still be wrong” (White 2009). However, there is one problem that philosophers have contemplated, and that is how do people differentiate morals from convention, perceptiveness, or
Teleological theory means consequentialist theories suggest that the moral value, the moral rightness or wrongness of an act, is entirely a function of the consequences or the results of that act. This theory is more so about the certain consequences one would obtain from a certain behavior, and not the actual behavior itself. If you were a mother and had a starving kid, and you went out to the grocery store and stole food, the question that would puzzle philosophers would be what is morally right in one’s mind as on the contrary what is morally wrong, however motives don’t really have anything to do with the rightfulness or the wrongfulness of an act. As Ronald White states, “from …show more content…
This theory is mostly based on rules and regulations, and an objective. Many philosophers even completely reject the teleological theory. The philosophers who don’t believe in the teleological theory are the ones who believe moral goodness have nothing to do with the consequences of one’s actions. Deontologist’s believe that “morality is based on whether acts conflict with moral rules or not” (White 2009). A deontologist, however, would argue that even if the American government conducted a detailed cost/benefit analysis of slavery and decided it created more pleasure in society than pain, it would still be wrong” (White 2009). However, there is one problem that philosophers have contemplated, and that is how do people differentiate morals from convention, perceptiveness, or