What Is Anselm's Ontological Argument

Improved Essays
Anselm’s Ontological argument argues that there is a God. Anselm argue is meaning there is nothing better than God. If the mind can think of such thing, therefore God is real. He argues that if God can be thought of he has to exist. That only someone such as a fool argues and states that there is not a God. If the fool can argue saying that there is no God he must believe in God for he thought of the idea that there is a God. Anselm then uses the example or analogy of the painter, for a fool to understand. That before a painter begins his work he visualizes what the painting will look like in his mind. Though the painting has not been painted yet he can see it and understand it in his head, where he sees it as a notion. When the painting

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Anselm's Three Proofs

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ANSELM: Like Augustine, Anselm used both faith and reason in his investigation for truth. In his view, Faith comes first but reason should follow, giving reasons for what human beings believe. Anselm’s monks asked him to write a model reflection on God in which everything would be proved by reason and nothing on the authority of Scripture. He replied with his “Monologion”. It contains three proofs of the existence of God, all of which are based on Neoplatonic thought.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Guanilo’s lost-island objection was meant to criticize Anselm’s argument of T.T. The idea of a wonderful and perfect island were resources are plentiful and life is easy is a wonderful thought that nothing greater can be thought of however, if the island does not exist then there is little point. The next best real island would always be greater because it is real not just a thought. Anselm responds to Guanilo in a very rhetorical way because after the island comparison it is evident that Guanilo can imagine something so great and wonderful. Anselm wants in his response to Guanilo for Guanilo to admit that he can imagine something so great as to imagine God because though God is not an island Guanilo admits he can imagine objects.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm is best known for the arguments he provided in regards to the existence of God. He especially contributed to what today is known as the “ontological argument”, or an argument about the state of existing or being. Anselm provides many reasonable arguments for the existence of God, and had an avid ability to explain reason behind it. Through Cur Deus Homo, he tries to rationalize God’s method for saving the world through Christ’s death as satisfaction, Anselm has been able to offer a significant view and meaning that many Christians today follow by providing a definition for the significance of Jesus’ death on the cross.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gaunilo responds to the Ontological Argument by saying that the argument “proves too much”. By this, Gaunilo means that the Ontological Argument could be applied to anything, not just God; even things that we know do not exist. The example that Gaunilo uses is conceiving the most perfect island than which no greater island is possible. The most perfect island must exist in reality and in the mind, because if it did not, then it would be possible to conceive of an island greater than the most perfect island, that is one that actually exists. Therefore, Gaunilo is arguing that by using Anselm’s reasoning, it is better to exist (in the mind and reality) than to not exist, for if it did not exist, it would not be as perfect.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Teleological Argument The existence of God can be supported by the design argument or teleological arguments that conclude: since nature looks like it was designed, then nature was or has a designer which we call God. Not only is nature designed but things humans have created are designed also. In order to have something in existence, it must have a creator which must have designed that something. A number of arguments utilize design arguments in favor of the existence of God.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers call such arguments a priori arguments. In the first premise he defines God as the greatest possible being that can be imagined. Then, he argues that God exists in reality is getter than God exists in the mind. Consequently,…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm bases his argument on the hierarchy of being, at the bottom of the hierarchy is elements and at the top is God. This idea of that than which nothing greater can be thought or simplified as TTWNGCBT, exists in a person’s mind as well as in the world as a tangible item. Existing in a person’s mind is equivalent to existing in their understanding and existing as a tangible item is equivalent to existing in reality. An example of these two existences is a painting, the painting exists in the painter’s mind, and then inevitably it is put on a canvas where it is visible for all of the world to see. Anselm explains that it is better for TTWNGCBT to exist in both understanding and in reality, than in just understanding, but he does not back up this claim.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Anselm's Ontological Argument consist of nine reasons to believe that god exists so that even the non believer can grasp the concept of god. Reason one, god exist in the understanding. Reason two, god might exist in reality. Reason three, of something exist in the understanding but not in reality, it could have been greater than it is. Reason four, god exists only in the understanding.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Anselm’s argument can be used to assume that God exists, but his argument only works for God. You can’t think anything else into existence, it’s just invalid. For example, you can’t just think unicorns into existence. They don’t exist and there is no way that if you believe they exist they will one day start roaming the Earth and begin their existence. Normally, we need proof to believe that something exists.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be explaining a meditation in Rene Descartes’ book, Meditations on First Philosophy. First I will summarize how he got to his point in meditation three, and then I will give my opinion on whether or not his claims are successful or unsuccessful. In meditation three Rene Descartes tries convincing the reader that God actually does exist. He starts off by briefly explaining the first two meditations.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is a claim that has many complications around it. Anselm believes it to be true that God exists as an idea in the mind. If God exists as an idea in the mind, then theoretically it should be possible for something greater than God to exist. Although, for Anselm, God is believed to be the greatest possible being that can be imagined. Therefore, it would be a contradiction to say that something greater than the greatest possible thing that can be imagined exists.…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “God is that which no greater can be conceived” is a statement that rules out any credible support other than from Anselm own Christian devotion. Anselm makes this evident when he states “I may understand that you exist as we believe you to exist, and that you are what we believe you to be” (Anselm, 7) this means that Anselm alone doesn’t know the clear nature of God but he is able to make simple inferences for this proof. So how can we come to know that God is none greater than can be conceived if we are designating our own definition of a maximally perfect being. Anselm portrays that God can be known solely from reasoning in thoughts rather than from impression of god himself in our knowledge.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm proves this wrong by saying that, this logic can only be applied to the maximally perfect God. First of all, the description given is not enough to prove is perfectness; the island can be faced with temporal, environmental and other consequences, unlike the concept of God. Also, there can be only one maximally perfect concept, that of God, hence that is the only concept this reasoning for existence can be applied…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ontological Argument and Pascal’s Wager The “Ontological Argument” was created by Saint Anselm; this argument is in support of God’s existence. His argument is one based on observation and reason not on empirical evidence and is spit in to three parts. The parts include why god exists, why god cannot be thought to not exist, and lastly why atheists are able to think that God does not exist. In the first section he begins with a definition of God that he believes everyone would be accepting of and that cannot be disputed.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Existence of God This argument about the existence of God, better known as the cosmological argument, begins with the late philosopher Aristotle. Similar to a modern day natural scientist, he believed that we could ascertain more about the world and the very fundamental nature of things within our world just by observing and recording. In many ways Aristotle resemble a modern day artist, a person who goes through life experiencing and watching all different types of energy that’s around, visually records this information and help others by spreading this knowledge to the mass. Aristotle too, would look and study the world and its patterns that were around him in order to gain insight into his world.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays