Web Wikipedia Research Paper

Decent Essays
Wikipedia is basically a web based, crowdsourced encyclopedia. They have millions of articles with a very wide variety of topics. The website's information is a collaboration of people ideas and research. The site allows anyone to edit the information on the articles. Because anyone can edit the article this often can lead to wrong information and sometimes even vandalism on the site. Wikipedia is visited by millions of people daily and is often used by students for research of many different topics for projects, research papers, etc. And because the site can be edited by anyone, frequently wrong information can be used. To reduce the bad information on the site wikipedia uses web-robots also known as bots, to run a software designed to spot …show more content…
The bots are ran daily and usually make thousands of fixes and changes within a 24 hour period. The bots can work more than twice as fast a human can fixing the errors. The bots wikipedia uses now are designed to learn as they keep changing the wrong articles. But even though they are a very useful tool they are able to catch everything. Wikipedia is now trying to entice people that are experts in their field of study and to join in and help provide the correct information. Some professors are now starting to give grades to their students who provide information to the site. I think wikipedia can be a good starting point for people doing research on any particular topic. But because

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 3 Assignment 1

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiki- is an open website for users to add their own information to help others. It is a huge encyclopaedia where users can join and write articles or new ones to help people for what they are searching for. Information is passed on around because users can edit on the article and insert their own information relevant to the article. You can either edit or change information on it. Here is an example…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Blown To Bits Summary

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hal Abelson, Ken Ledeen, and Harry Lewis use their fourth chapter of their book Blown to Bits to discuss search engines. They describe how search engines work, and the possible problems that they could have. As was the case with the third chapter of Blown to Bits, I enjoyed reading this chapter. I felt that this chapter was not written to condemn technology, but rather to inform people about something that has become a vital element of human society. I was intrigued by the authors’ discussion of all of their topics.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” which appeared as a cover article of the Atlantic in 2008, Nicholas Carr argues that the use of google and the web is making humans stupid. Carr talks about the fact that his concentration has drifted easily, and his reading skills have become a struggle due to the time he spends online. However, Carr agrees that the web does have the advantage of immediate access to information… “what the net seems to being doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation” (737). According to Carr, when the web is used so often, the struggle to stay focused and write long pieces has become a battle.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A computer science graduate came up with The Wikiscanner software in two weeks in the summer of 2007(Hafner 86). Virgil Griffith is the twenty-four year old,” disruptive technologist” he was first interested when told about members of Congress editing their own Wikipedia entries for personal gain (Hafner 87). These said members of Congress were obviously deleting…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Health information used by healthcare professionals as well as consumers should come from a trusted and reliable source. There are thousands of websites, online services, and ‘apps’ available for use that provide health information to anyone searching for it. The importance of knowing what is trustworthy cannot be underestimated for the safety of information recipients (National Cancer Institute, 2015). The content of the Internet is unregulated so confidence level in the content should be assessed and the content reliability questioned (National Network of Libraries of Medicine, 2016; UCSF, 2016)? What is it that makes a website ‘good’?…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this regard, the users of this text include Wikipedia writers, the hackers, and editors (Bruns, 2008). Many people are concerned with what is important to change in the material as compared to the addition of a useful perspective. The readers can be one who is eager to write with an anonymous name, the one who is writing on historical aspects or the one who is constantly looking for the new developments in modes and changes to the system. The readers are the different ages, races and the technology fields.…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Non Credible Sources

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another thing that makes Wikipedia a non-credible source is that anyone can make updates or change any/all of the information on the page as long as you create a Wikipedia account. This is portrayed within the URL provided above with each edit from different authors. The hardest part about sifting through the nutritional information was having to verify whether or not the information given on this site was accurate by going to a credible source to compare the information. Sifting through the information just way too time consuming, incredibly inconvenient and entirely…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wikipedia is considered to possibly contain too much malicious content because of its open-source theme allowing articles to be edited by too many different people. Where is the proof that this content outweighs the genuine articles with factual information? Throughout my years of school research I was steered away from Wikipedia because of the allegations of it containing too much content that is not true. I have used Wikipedia several times throughout researching topics and I don’t recall a time where I was led to content that is incorrect or intentionally vandalized. I would search several sites looking for answers to questions that I needed to double check because I could not trust Wikipedia and every time the answer that I find would give be the same answer that I could easily get on Wikipedia.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Increasingly so, the world is shifting to life on technology, rather than life in books, but is it for the better? Humans are becoming less and less dependent on books and common knowledge, and more reliant upon engines like google to act as a brain. People under the age of thirty are paving the way for the upcoming “dumbest generation”, by replacing thinking with technology, disregarding books and reading, and lessening the language skills of their own generation. In the current age of technology, there are massive amounts of resources that can be used to obtain any kind of information that one can imagine.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although Wikipedia can offer a vast amount of information on different subjects, I don't think that students should be allowed to use it as a source in research papers. I feel this way because Wikipedia's information may not be able to be relied on as credible because its writers don't have to be specialists or have any type of expertise in the subject areas that they write about or contribute information on. Also, the information doesn't always have to be found to be accurate and true before it is added. Wikipedia itself states that not all of its information is "accurate, comprehensive, or unbiased" (Researching with Wikipedia). I find that to be very concerning especially if you are relying on the information found in it to be used for a…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many teachers claim that Wikipedia is “unreliable and factually incorrect”. Since anyone can edit any page on Wikipedia, every page is bound to be incorrect, right? While what teachers claim is true to an extent, what they don’t know is that they and their students could be missing out on not just a valuable resource, but also what could be a valuable learning lesson along with it. Here are three reasons why Wikipedia should be allowed in schools. One reason could be…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Credibility Of Wikipedia

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    All together they have almost 6 million edits logged. Just the first 4 top users of Wikipedia! We have no way to prove that those almost 6 million edits were credible facts. That was from a website that auto tracks the amount of edits made on Wikipedia. Also, in the list of 5,000 top editors of Wikipedia, there are some people who haven’t been assigned a job by Wikipedia.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    That is also right to some degree since, “Google has begun to use ranking in combination with auto-completion algorithms which offer a dynamic list of suggestions when someone types words into the search box” (Baker 189). In layman 's terms, Google takes the top searched sites in coordination to what you searched and can give a website that could be either correct in its information or wrong or could give a virus. This can be dangerous to allow naïve students who believe everything they see on the internet. For the students who like to cheat, they can. However, when they go into a professional field and know nothing, they will regret for not trying to retain the information that they were supposed to…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julie J.C.H. Ryan’s essay “Student Plagiarism in an Online World” explains how effortless it is for college students to plagiarize their essays and avoid learning through the help of modern technology. On the contrary, undergraduates use the Internet as a means to bolster their education. Savvy technology has helped ease the life of twenty-first century students. The Internet is helpful because it acts as a virtual library for research, enhances relationships between professors and students, and also provides services on how to study.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Alexie, Sherman. “A Good Story.” The St. Martin’s Guide to Writing. Eds. Rise B. Alexrod, Charles R. Cooper.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays